As mark_in_cali illustrates in such a timely fashion, Jews will resort to name-calling and childish insults when they're backed in a corner and can't refute you. The Jews' communication style is very distinctive: they are very aggressive in their manner toward gentiles, and using foul-mouthed language is natural for them, as they have no standards of behavior in their culture - they are not a refined people or civilized; like people from other Middle Eastern cultures, they become very easily inflamed and do not argue like Whites do - with reason and calmness ....

Wait to see more vulgarities from this Jew's mouth. I have also observed the same degeneration into name-calling and stupid insults carried on by other Jews here. If a poster tries and turn this thread into a name-calling contest when the thread takes on a Jew-exposing bent, you can be sure it is because of a Jew; he is trying to sabotage the thread and get it buried - not only that, but that his emotionalism is easily aroused - as a Mediterranean, his emotions are quick to come to the surface; mark_in_cali feels threatened on several fronts by me:

1) That I outed him as a Jew: he drops his friendly act quickly and shows his true face: the aggressive White-hating face;
2) That I described the Jews accurately - I described his people; I described what and his cronies are doing right here in this thread and in many others here on VNN.

Anyway, you were saying in response to my question-- you are who on Stormfront or elsewhere?

Why do you want to know? Who are YOU to demand answers from me?

It's my business who I posted as and IF I posted there at all.

In my "two posts" I've made more anti-Jewish comments than mark_in_cali and imadrifter etc have done in their hundreds of posts here, and John Jew Tree has done in his thousands of posts at SF.

Oh, I forgot - THOSE posters don't think Jews are the problem. And that we WNs 'blame EVERYTHING on the Jews'. And "Muslims are a greater problem to the White race than the Jew," and "Nonsense, there is no such thing as a Jewish infiltrator at WN forums." Right?

Why do you want to know?

It's my business who I posted as and IF I posted there at all.

In my "two posts" I've done more damage to Jews than mark_in_cali and imadrifter etc have done in their hundreds of posts here, and John Jew Tree has done in his thousands of posts at SF.

I think it's obvious why. Your main business here has been to make these statements against these three. I'm not a big fan of imadrifter either. Do you know him/her? Of all the antis and flamers, you pick these three. It's odd. Further, as you are anonymous as they are (with the exception of Fenris-- who IS known personally to some of us)....then why should we believe your "allegational" agenda? In other words, if you are a known activist, then ID yourself. Your flimsy allegations have no value. Though again-- I am not a fan of imadrifter-- who likes to post more heavily during times of major board dissents.

By the way, you are a Jewish infiltrator too, Chain. You just outed yourself by defending the Jew shills on VNN.

Nothing odd about picking out those as Jews. Who else but Jews are going to defend Jewish infiltration and Jewish infiltrators.

I could show you my uncirmcumsized dick, but why bother? You are an anti troll. You'll be banned shortly. Watch and see.
Muad Dib's primer on the jews
http://www.nationalistpartyusa.org/Primer.htm
Come and Hear about jews
http://www.comeandhear.com/navigate.html

I'm convinced that posters like "trailblazer" are an over exaggerated parody of those of us who name actual jews.

I'm convinced that posters like "trailblazer" are an over exaggerated parody of those of us who name actual jews.

"Parody"? I think you mean troll. How about yourself?
Muad Dib's primer on the jews
http://www.nationalistpartyusa.org/Primer.htm
Come and Hear about jews
http://www.comeandhear.com/navigate.html

"Parody"? I think you mean troll. How about yourself?

It's only amusing to them. Not to me. But I'm convinced that's the way they see it.

It's amusing to watch Jews conversing with one another - unless of course if they're talking to themselves (3lite88 has 2 posts to his name). Creating identities that 'agree with them' is a subterfuge that a Jew employs. Of course, if they will stoop to the level of pretending to be something they're not, they will do anything no matter how self-debasing.

View this thread to see: JEWS ON THE ATTACK. Or alternatively, JEWS TRYING TO CREATE COVER FOR THEMSELVES.

"Name Jews?" I doubt Chain has named a Jew in his life, including himself. Classic foil to reveal who a Jew is: name a crypto-Jew and all the Jewish infiltrators will come crawling out and defend the crypto-Jew from the naming.

This is an important function of the Jewish infiltrator as naming the Jew is very bad business for them. As Horst Mailer said, Jews name each other freely when they think there are no Gentiles around, but it is anathema to them when Gentiles do the same. The Jews will show their famed cohesiveness and attack the Jew-namer in unison; not only that but when in undercover mode, they will respond to being called a Jew by saying that it is 'an insult' and will proceed to attack the accuser. This is a strange response when you think about it.

If you were not a Jew, you could easily defend yourself from that accusation. You could start saying you think Jews are this, and Jews are that; you don't like Jews because .... But Jewish infiltrators won't do that, because they are Jews. They will immediately go on the offensive because they have nothing to defend themselves with; their posting record shows them to be Jews, to have defended Jews - crypto- or otherwise - they cannot show their postings as back up - numbers of posts are meaningless if the content shows an aversion to criticizing Jews (see John Jew Tree's posts). A true WN can very easily defend himself against such an accusation although this sort of accusation is rarely made against a WN.

You will find that the same people are the ones who are accused by different people as being Jews. This is what happened with Muadib's banning. The people he accused of being Jews were the same people that many other posters independently concluded were Jews. This is the same with the people I've named as Jews in this thread.

Jews may try to hide but it is obvious from their posting style and content especially their propensity to defend Jews wherever and however they manifest themselves (as alternative media figures; mods on WN forums; or people posing as WNs).

Jews are a cancer to the society they enter. This is not to be metaphorically insulting to them but to describe in biological terms how they function in the world. They are smaller numbers than the host is (just like cancer cells), they imitate normal body cells so that the body doesn't reject them (just like cancer cells fool the host into thinking they are normal cells), they take away the nutrients from the normal cells and divert it to themselves (like cancer cells that eventually cause the death of normal cells through starvation), they metastasize - they spread far and wide, traveling through the blood system - the veins and arteries and lymphatics (just how cancer cells seed throughout the body) and they, like cancer cells, end up killing their host.

"Name Jews?" I doubt Chain has named a Jew in his life...

It's really annoying that mods aren't around as often during European daylight hours. You are quite a neurotic, high-strung tribesjude, with your awarenesses of Horst Mahler and your round robin games.

"The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents, but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in spite of their flagrant usage of fallacies of logic, they acted as if they could not understand the counter arguments and bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature from the original theme. If you faced them with this point they would escape again, and you could not bring them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles, one's hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened. Should you become indignant and remind him of yesterday's defeat, he pretended astonishment and could not remember anything, except that on the previous day he had proved that his statements were correct. Sometimes I did not know what amazed me the more; the abundance of their verbiage or the artful way in which they dressed up their falsehoods."