The Aborigines are among the lowest of all races. Its a wonder how anyone could consider these beasts "human".

Like someone else said, in their 40,000 years of history, all the Aborigines invented was a curved stick and a hollowed out piece of wood called a didjeridoo.

The Aborigines are among the lowest of all races

If Billions of dollars were spent on the Aborigines, like the Ape NIGgers
in the US; I would guess they would be just as smart.
So its a tuff call to say which is the lower form of life.

Fascinating. This information reminds me of something I read a few years back in a book entitled The Math Gene by Keith Devlin. In one of the book’s early chapters, Devlin discusses findings suggesting that a sense of number beyond 3 is something that’s pretty much unique to humans.

The author cites evidence suggesting that different brain mechanisms (counting-based mechanisms) are involved in mentally processing collections of objects greater than 3. According to Devlin, groups of less than 3 are processed in an almost subconscious way that is not dependent on counting-based mental processing. Perhaps it’s not such a stretch to suggest that in Australian Aboriginals the counting-based brain mechanisms needed to cope with numbers far beyond 3 are not present or primitively developed at best, as evidenced by their lack of symbols for numbers beyond 3.

If I recall correctly, the Devlin book didn’t cite these facts regarding the quasi-innumerate Aborigines. But given the state of PC orthodoxy this comes no surprise. He did, however, cite a few cases of people with cerebral lesions caused by strokes, tumors, etc., who had lost the ability to cognitively process groups of objects larger than 3.

Yes but they also have the best health of homo sapiens. Excellent eyesight, perfect figures, perfect teeth, high levels of fitness, it is rare for them to cough or sneeze etc. They do crash pretty hard when brought into civilization, but civilization causes degeneration. I don't think that Whites can sit back and sneer at these people. We are sick and dying.

Charles your post made me think... Maybe the wild aborgines are healthy because those are the only ones that could make it in the wild. And I'm not just talking this generation, but the only ones who could make it to reproduce in past generations would be the same.

Unfortunately we in the white world are degenerating. I remember in one of my high school classes being shocked to find that I was the only person who didn't wear contact lenses or eye glasses. Obviously good eyesight would be very important in the wild. But in the white world we are so civilized that we can survive through problems such as poor eyesight. Today would any of us think anything of breeding with a woman with glasses? Of course not, and indeed a majority of women probably needs corrective lenses to be able to see properly.

But isn't that a scary thought when a large percentage maybe even a majority of young adults need corrective lenses just to see normally?

Yes but they also have the best health of homo sapiens. Excellent eyesight, perfect figures, perfect teeth, high levels of fitness, it is rare for them to cough or sneeze etc.

Back in the mid 1930's two Germans crash landed their stricken Aircraft on a lonely beach in remote Northern Australia. Neither was injured and both were fit and young, they managed to salvage a few items, pocket knives some fuel clothing etc but when their food supplies ran out they were in deep trouble.

This part of the country is some of the most remote country on Earth. The young Germans found a cave in which to shelter but as their food had all but gone and their physical condition declined things looked very grim.

Then along came a small party of Aboriginies who gave them food and showed them how easy it is to find food particularly on the coast. Soon the men were enjoying Oysters, Shellfish etc and with the help of these primitive people they managed to find their way to Darwin and eventually to Sydney. The remarkable story of survival (not to mention good luck) made headlines in Australia, had these men been Englishmen this story would have been broadcast all over the World. However these men were Germans and Adolf Hitler was Chancellor of Nazi Germany.

The irony to me is that two savvy young guys from the then most advanced nation on Earth, became completely helpless when stuck on the rocky windswept shores of Australia's north and only survived because lady luck came up with the 'Boories' who when counting, say ONE then TWO then THREE and then MANY.

True talk, as they say.

Then along came a small party of Aboriginies who gave them food and showed them how easy it is to find food particularly on the coast. Soon the men were enjoying Oysters, Shellfish etc and with the help of these primitive people they managed to find their way to Darwin and eventually to Sydney.

The Germans had zero preparation for the sudden change in their environment. The Aboriginies had multi-generational preparations for living on that coast ( who knows how many died, failing the task ). A very unfair comparison .

Charles your post made me think... Maybe the wild aborgines are healthy because those are the only ones that could make it in the wild. And I'm not just talking this generation, but the only ones who could make it to reproduce in past generations would be the same.

Unfortunately we in the white world are degenerating. I remember in one of my high school classes being shocked to find that I was the only person who didn't wear contact lenses or eye glasses. Obviously good eyesight would be very important in the wild.

Would it ? why, we aren't eagles or falcons . Forethought, laying up supplies would be a thousand times more critical to survival . Making good snares, knowing animal behavior would be many times more important . Man did not exist alone, some in the tribe well sighted, others clever , others strong . Man did not exist singly but in tribes . The collective health of the tribe would be the most critical .

But isn't that a scary thought when a large percentage maybe even a majority of young adults need corrective lenses just to see normally?

No , Keratotomy will soon correct most problems with nearsightedness.

How do you know that nearsightedness isn't a superior vision? People who can focus at closer distances might make better tools , or observe things closely .

As ppl age they tend to become farsighted and not able to focus closely, that might be a liability .

"The numerals in use were limited. In some tribes there were only three in use, in most four."

http://65.1911encyclopedia.org/A/AU/AUSTRALIA.htm

GET THIS... THEY ONLY COUNTED TO THREE! Read the entire article. Honesty shines through, spiting in the face of modern "cultural anthropology" (created by Jews Boas and Levi Strauss) which is only judeology by another name.

The truth is even worse than this. They didn't have any 'real' numbers.
Some tribes didn't even have a word for one, just words like 'there' and 'many', no real 'counting' numbers , not even one .

How many eons would it be before they came up with concepts like 'imaginary numbers','vectors', 'matrix math', 'boolean algebra' ? ...... NEVER !

This is one place the races show real seperation, in math . Blacks fall flat on their faces, when working with anything beyond simple arithmetic . Where has the most advanced math come from , Germany, France , England, Holland , Russia , Italy ( see a pattern ? )

"They have much acuteness of perception for the relations of individual objects, but little power of generalization. No word exists in their language for general terms such as tree, bird or fish; yet they have invented names for every species of vegetable and animal they know."

Their facial structure is somewhere between Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens. Genetically, they are the only sharply distinct entity within the human specie, not only due to their isolation (at least 40,000 years) but also for their hybrid origins (Late Erectus specimens from Java, such as the "Mungo Man" mixed with real homo sapiens). Even historically recent deposits pose problems of specie identification (since Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens are seen as different species), such as the Kow Swamp man. From time to time, purely erectus individuals appear in Aboriginal communities. A woman in Tasmania, suffering from no mental illness, had only 1,000 CC in brain capacity, which is far behind acceptable limits of brain size for modern humans (1,300-1,500).

If the White race was put in Aborigine conditions, over 99% of it would die out very quickly. This would be very good for the White race.

Egalitarianism is degenerate/Jewish, it is not the case that ugly people are intelligent, or strong people are stupid, or skillful musicians are bad at writing. Qualities correlate fairly strongly in people, in general the more intelligent the person the better his health, the more attractive he is, the heavier weights he can lift etc.

Strength through strife is the rule of life.
The easy way leads to decay.

What is so good about inventing all kinds of abstract mathematics or technology? The purpose of life is to evolve. The only value is biological progress. Technology just makes people weaker.

What is so good about inventing all kinds of abstract mathematics or technology? The purpose of life is to evolve. The only value is biological progress. Technology just makes people weaker.

Abstract concepts such as mathematical thinking are most certainly biological in origin, as they arise within the physical neural structures of the human brain. It's fairly safe to say that the aboriginal brain, in a physical sense, is less evolved in comparison to those possessed by other races, (even negroid races) hence the innumeracy of the aboriginals who tote tiny 1000cc brains around in pre-human skulls.

Would it ? why, we aren't eagles or falcons . Forethought, laying up supplies would be a thousand times more critical to survival . Making good snares, knowing animal behavior would be many times more important . Man did not exist alone, some in the tribe well sighted, others clever , others strong . Man did not exist singly but in tribes . The collective health of the tribe would be the most critical .

I notice health problems don't appear in tribal man much. I see what you are saying though. Maybe it is what Charles is saying that health correlates across all factors. So someone who is sick a lot, maybe unbalanced hormones.. is much more likely to have sight problems then a healthy individual.

No , Keratotomy will soon correct most problems with nearsightedness.

The white race is the race of man which overcomes nature. From making it light during the nighttime, to setting the temperature where we live, to blocking the ocean from coming in for large areas. We aren't defined by our limits, but by our ability to overcome those limits.

I think we need a balanced approach.. which is why I support both eugenics and deep research into how our biology works. And how we can change that to make the lives of our people better.

Abstract concepts such as mathematical thinking are most certainly biological in origin, as they arise within the physical neural structures of the human brain. It's fairly safe to say that the aboriginal brain, in a physical sense, is less evolved in comparison to those possessed by other races, (even negroid races) hence the innumeracy of the aboriginals who tote tiny 1000cc brains around in pre-human skulls.

Yes the other hominids in the world today are far behind us in brain development.