Well, the beans have been spilled. US sovereignty means nothing to our president. You know, that dickhead who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. I predict the loss of our national sovereignty will come in steps. I predicted this before, but I neglected this first "baby step" to UN one-world government. First it will be the North American Union. Next it will be the Organization of American States, whose headquarters is located in DC, that pulls the reins of power. (Not that this means anything, but I have actually been to the OAS headquarters.) Then it will be a loose confederation of 'regional' governments, like the OAS, EU, Organization of African Unity, SEATO, etc. Then...drum roll please!!! TA DA!!! The UN runs the show. Totally. Completely. White man, when that happens, it will make the mess we are in now look like a stag party.

P. S.-Has anyone seen the new North American Union flag design yet? How are you liking this shit, White man?

Except in the case of dire, world-destroying emergency, the UN will never simply declare its sovereignty over the world. Far better to give the illusion of freedom by permitting a number of continental blocs their pseudo-autonomy. Like 1984. Anyone who thinks that the age of 1984-esque government tyranny is merely 'coming' isn't paying attention.

Except in the case of dire, world-destroying emergency, the UN will never simply declare its sovereignty over the world. Far better to give the illusion of freedom by permitting a number of continental blocs their pseudo-autonomy. Like 1984. Anyone who thinks that the age of 1984-esque government tyranny is merely 'coming' isn't paying attention.

Do not think that disaster scenarios couldn't be created for the justification of the UN publicly declaring world sovereignty. Any supranational government that is put in place or given more authority, whether it is publicly or secretly, will be done so at the behest of the jews and what suits them. If the jews see this proposed North American Union as a benefit to them, then it will be enacted. No matter what supranational government declares what sovereignty over what area or what people, ultimately there will be a world government whether it is declared or not. And it may not necessarily be the UN running the show, although that is the most likely scenario (publicly at least). It is a question of how incremental the steps are to that world sovereignty, publicly declared or not. The jews weakness in this and any matter in their fight with us is their arrogance and overconfidence. In their minds, they have already won. That kind of thinking has been the undoing of many a regime.

Unless something is done soon.

Here a jew lackey CONservative laments the US losing its sovereignty to the proposed North American Union. His view of things as a CONservative is jewfied, but he nevertheless hits the nail on the head in the first paragraph. That's Hitler's revenge.

Ominous rumblings of a "North American Union"

Chris Adamo
April 21, 2005

Among the greatest ironies of history is that during the first part of the twentieth century two World Wars and a "Cold War" were fought on the European continent, for the specific purpose of preventing its consolidation under one governing authority. Yet by the end of the century Europeans had acquiesced to just such a fate.

Though not imposed with the imperiousness of the Kaiser or the brute force of the Reich, the concept of the "European Union" runs contrary to traditional ideas of nationalism or patriotism. Such crass sentiments are the realm of commoners, thus making them counterproductive to the new order.

Nevertheless, the lowly masses were eventually bought off with glowing assurances of economic benefits and all of the standard empty promises of liberal utopianism. Predictably, the vast majority of the European Union's "citizenry" continue to struggle, having been further mired by the malaise of that continent's burdensome socialism, which is now driven by a vastly enlarged bureaucracy.

Unfortunately, though the overwhelming majority of Americans hold such concepts in complete contempt, similar anti-national thinking has nonetheless encroached upon its shores to a degree Islamic jihadists might envy.

Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright once lamented that American military dominance was inherently unfair, and that the best remedy was to assist the advancement of competing military establishments in other countries. Supreme Court Justices Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Ginsburg have, in recent rulings, looked to the laws and governing philosophies of other nations for justification.

But while the majority of Americans do not embrace this contemptible thinking, neither do they stage mass protests in the wake of such court decisions, demanding the ouster of their authors, as would certainly have been the case only a few short years ago. Moreover, it is becoming increasingly evident that such alarming ideologies are not confined to those on the left.

Though the signs of a growing acceptance of this mindset have become glaringly obvious, most Americans remain reluctant to believe that their leaders would even contemplate the forfeiture of this nation's sovereignty to such a degree. Yet the behavior of high placed individuals, including President Bush, raise extremely disturbing questions as to just how willing they might be to copy the Europeans.

Recently, Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Ernesto Derbez Baustista floated a "trial balloon" during a speech at the University of Texas, ominously revealing a possible answer. According to Baustista, Mexico and the United States should eventually become "integrated," thus forming what can only be construed as the hub of a "North American Union," no doubt eventually including Canada as well.

President Bush has indicated a disturbing sympathy towards such thinking, refusing to characterize Mexican immigrants as "illegal." In contrast, he implies illegality by the "Minutemen" who now protect the border, having described them as "vigilantes."

Conversely, he discusses the actions of the "undocumented immigrants" as "pursuing their dreams," seemingly indifferent to the fact that Americans will be forced to shoulder the burden of fulfilling those dreams, ultimately at the expense of their own.

On other crucial fronts, the President clearly shows a willingness to embrace policies that significantly weaken the nation's borders. When dealing with Canada, he steadfastly advocates a beef import program that clearly puts the interests of Canadian beef producers ahead of their American competitors.

Thus he allows an influx of beef from the north that threatens to seriously degrade this country's food supply. Though a financial boon to Canadian agriculture, it provides no incentives to enhance the quality of beef produced there while undermining the viability of American cattle growers.

Meanwhile, President Bush has been championing the "Law Of the Sea Treaty" (LOST), whereby seagoing Americans would henceforth be subject to a maritime version of the "International Criminal Court."

The perceived "benefits" of this blurring of national boundaries might initially sound attractive, particularly to individuals whose primary impetus is monetary. But America stands to lose far more than it could ever hope to gain by compromising its freedom and independence.

Although indispensable to national security, an able military is not the key to a strong nation. Such strength lies within its culture. America cannot remain strong or great if it is overwhelmed by people who uphold neither its society nor its laws, but instead seek only after its wealth.

Despite the establishment of the "European Union" that continent's vibrancy and greatness continue to decline as a result of its own cultural erosion. America may soon follow.

© Copyright 2005 by Chris Adamo
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/adamo/050421

Unless something is done soon.

...UUUUGGGHH!!!

The Merging of the United States with Canada and Mexico
It's Happening Right Now!

http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/merge2.htm

These are the Ten Kingdoms of the World spoken of in Revelation.

The only change that has been made since this map was first produced is that now they plan to include
Mexico with the U.S. and Canada, rather than combining it with Central and South America.