Like victims of Stockholm Syndrome, Whites in the post-WW2 order can't bring themselves to put their finger on the real problems with society--they have to avoid discussing race. So they have produced the most incredible set of "workarounds" and false explanations of any population that I know of. They not only produce incredible bullshit, but they swallow the bullshit imposed on them by the jew order and repeat it insistently.

One example (see how many you can think of) is the idea--very big in cuckservative circles--that it's "fatherlessness" that causes societal dysfunction.

I call bullshit.

Anybody over age 30 who has been paying any attention to politics knows that the idea of "fatherlessness" as the cause of societal dysfunction originated with the cuckservatives' attempt to explain nigger crime in non-racial terms. Why is the ghetto so violent? Above all, why won't "people" (snicker) in the ghetto get off welfare and save us some money so that we can spend it on jew wars? Well, of course the problem can't have anything to do with race--that's racist! So for a while the blame was placed on "Democrat mayors," "lack of free enterprise zones," "high taxes"--in other words, the standard cuckservative bullshit. (You occasionally still hear the "Democrat mayors" explanation, mostly during election years, in tard forums like Breitbart comments sections.)

But since even a blind man can see that it's niggers causing the problems and suffering the brunt of them, some cuckservatives were reluctantly forced to shamefacedly acknowledge "a lack of progress in the African-American community"--they were forced to use the words "African-American" and (worst of all) "community"! For cuckservatives, that's close to the red line of Racism and Socialism. But never fear! The cuckservatives didn't cross the red line. Instead they offered a new batch of non-explanations--explanations that safely Have Nothing To Do With Race. This time we heard: the problem with "youths" is that they need to pull up their pants. They need to get a job.

The rise of Black Lives Matter put all those non-explanations on the backburner. The revelation that Dr. Huxtable was a raping nigger all along didn't help the cuckservatives' cause, either.

Nevertheless, one of the "safe" non-explanations of niggerdom survived: black boys need fathers! If black fathers would stick around and play catch with their children, then these "youths" will grow up with a Republican philosophy and therefore the ghetto will become civilized.

So where we stand is this: the "left" says guns cause the nigger problem, and the "right" says single mothers cause the nigger problem. Offering the idea that niggers themselves are the problem will get you fired from any job.

Now, the new development, the incredible bullshit that is prevalent not only among nigger apologists but now also among pozzed social commentators of all kinds, is: a lack of fathers explains social and economic dysfunction in general.

A politically correct, non-racial workaround employed by nigger apologists to talk about ghetto problems has metastasized to "explain" practically everything wrong with society in general, or at least with "this generation." People seize on it as if they were grasping a lifeline:

It's not the jews. It's the single mothers!

It's the lack of dads playing catch with sons. It's not the jews!

It's not the muds! Not White genocide!

Deadbeat dads did all this.

Above all, it's not the jews.

We could fix society by honoring the father, etc.

We certainly don't have to address race, at least not so "obsessively." Let's concentrate on dads!

This is the latest bullshit avoidance of our real problems. Merica needs dads! That will fix it!

Enterprise zones, lower taxes, gittin' a job, pullin' up your pants, the Bible, and dads.

It's as if a doctor were forbidden from saying or even thinking "cancer," so that when a patient presents cancer symptoms, the doctor treats the symptoms separately, not the underlying cancer.

But this "it's the fatherless boys" meme, despite its traction, is pretty silly. Some societies have a tradition of fathers not interacting with their children until the children are adults (e.g., the bourgeois in Czarist Russia kept the father out of the nursery). Fathers, being human, are variable; there are just as many stories of fathers abusing children and ruining their lives as there are of fathers helping children to be good people.

I think part of the reason why this non-solution has metastasized is that the (((sexual revolution))) and the poz in general have resulted in a generation of broken families, and a lot of young men are wallowing in self-pity over the fact that their Daddy wasn't around. They idealize the absent Daddy--he's Superman. He would fix all the shit. He would solve all problems. Everything would be better if he were here.

These self-described "lost boys" (like nature-lovers) don't consider the downside of their ideal. A little realistic reflection would show them that it's just as possible that Daddy would not be a solution--that he might in fact be their New Biggest Problem. Daddy might beat and rape them. Daddy might drive them crazy, disappoint them. There used to be a whole generation of whiners who blamed Daddy for ruining their lives. Now the whiners are blaming the lack of Daddy for ruining their lives.

It's all bullshit.