Ridiculous:

* 19 dumb as shit Arab madmen,

Who says they are "dumb as shit"? Most of them are far more educated than yourself.

who couldn't pilot a single engine Cessna,

According to who?

guided by a turbanned mastermind on the other side of the planet,

No, not guided by Bin Laden. That has been established. Also being on the other side of the planet is thankfully no longer a serious communication problem thanks to the invention of international telephony, the internet, and satellite communications. Welcome to the 21st century!

hijacking 4 commercial airliners successfully, using "boxcutters", at the exact same time, and then piloting them on suicide missions which result in the total collapse of two of the world's largest towers.

You know if you actually take the time to PLAN something for years, it's not that hard. The storming of Eban Emael was planned for far less time, and the"invincible" fortress with its large garrison was forced to surrendur to TWELVE German paratroopers.

And then making a 757 completely vanish at the Pentagon.

You would have to be a very special kind of stupid to believe that after hitting one of the world's strongest buildings at a high speed, a commercial airplane would remain even remotely intact. Tell me, ARE you that stupid? Do you actually believe that you should see a plane fuselage sticking out of that building?

Here's why you don't see any debris in that picture: THAT IS ON THE OUTER RING! If you looked at ALL the damage photos you would see that plenty of plane debris was found all over the area, the plane went THROUGH SEVERAL RINGS. This idiotic theory, written hastily by a Frenchman who had seen limited coverage, is not only contradicted by eyewitnesses but the airplane's flight recorder was recovered.

Dov Zackheim, Pentagon Comptroller, Has Misplaced A Trillion $
by Likud Watch Monday, Jan. 31, 2005 at 3:36 PM
porkworms@yahoo.com

[indent]A Sharon Trojan Horse in the Pentagon siphoning money to him?[/indent]

Dov Zakheim resigned as Pentagon Comptroller and Chief Financial
Officer at the beginning of March when it was revealed that the he is
unable to account for the disappearance of a trillion dollars
($1,000,000,000,000). It is unlikely that this will receive much
coverage in the mainstream media.

A General Accounting Office report found Defence inventory systems so
lax that the US army lost track of 56 aeroplanes, 32 tanks and 36
Javelin missile command launch-units. - Al Jazeera

Now here's a new wrinkle for conspiracy theorists who believe that
the hijacked planes were actually remotely controlled from the ground
and that the hijackers were actually themselves turned into suicide
mission patsies. Put this name into your system: Dov Zakheim

BACKGROUND

1985 to 1987 he was deputy under secretary of defense for planning
and resources, and held various other senior Pentagon posts in the
Reagan administration. He was previously with the Congressional
Budget Office. Zakheim is currently corporate vice president of the
Systems Planning Corporation (SPC), a high-technology research,
analysis, and manufacturing firm, and chief executive officer and
president of SPC International, Inc. In 1998, Zakheim, an expert in
ballistic missiles, worked in 1998 with Rumsfeld Commission. More
significantly, he is a long-time Bush associate, having served as a
policy advisor to the governor during the 2000 campaign. In May,
2001, Zakheim was sworn in to the Bush Administration as Under
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) of the DOD.

Here's the wrinkle: Zakheim's company produces advanced Command
Transmitter Systems, designed to provide "remote control and flight
termination functions through a fully redundant, self-contained solid
state system." The unit is just 5 feet high and can be mounted easily
on a mobile platform. Although designed to control unmanned flights
such as Global hawk from remote positions on the ground, one British
aviation engineer said after 9/11 that the planes used in the attacks
were could have been equipped with, or suitable for, such remote
control units.

Unknown news & Oil Empire

In an article from "Government Executive" magazine, Zakheim
admitted, "...we are in the business of fighting wars." - Uri
Dowbenko

This Zakheim linked company stands to make
a hell of a lot of CASH from The war on terror- GO FIGURE!

Remote control flight is POSSIBLE.

Amount of evidence this contributes to the claim that remote control planes hit the WTC towers: 0

Dov Zackheim, Pentagon Comptroller, Has Misplaced A Trillion $
by Likud Watch Monday, Jan. 31, 2005 at 3:36 PM
porkworms@yahoo.com
[indent]A Sharon Trojan Horse in the Pentagon siphoning money to him?[/indent]
Dov Zakheim resigned as Pentagon Comptroller and Chief Financial
Officer at the beginning of March when it was revealed that the he is
unable to account for the disappearance of a trillion dollars
($1,000,000,000,000). It is unlikely that this will receive much
coverage in the mainstream media.

A General Accounting Office report found Defence inventory systems so
lax that the US army lost track of 56 aeroplanes, 32 tanks and 36
Javelin missile command launch-units. - Al Jazeera

Now here's a new wrinkle for conspiracy theorists who believe that
the hijacked planes were actually remotely controlled from the ground
and that the hijackers were actually themselves turned into suicide
mission patsies. Put this name into your system: Dov Zakheim

BACKGROUND

1985 to 1987 he was deputy under secretary of defense for planning
and resources, and held various other senior Pentagon posts in the
Reagan administration. He was previously with the Congressional
Budget Office. Zakheim is currently corporate vice president of the
Systems Planning Corporation (SPC), a high-technology research,
analysis, and manufacturing firm, and chief executive officer and
president of SPC International, Inc. In 1998, Zakheim, an expert in
ballistic missiles, worked in 1998 with Rumsfeld Commission. More
significantly, he is a long-time Bush associate, having served as a
policy advisor to the governor during the 2000 campaign. In May,
2001, Zakheim was sworn in to the Bush Administration as Under
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) of the DOD.

Here's the wrinkle: Zakheim's company produces advanced Command
Transmitter Systems, designed to provide "remote control and flight
termination functions through a fully redundant, self-contained solid
state system." The unit is just 5 feet high and can be mounted easily
on a mobile platform. Although designed to control unmanned flights
such as Global hawk from remote positions on the ground, one British
aviation engineer said after 9/11 that the planes used in the attacks
were could have been equipped with, or suitable for, such remote
control units.

Unknown news & Oil Empire

In an article from "Government Executive" magazine, Zakheim
admitted, "...we are in the business of fighting wars." - Uri
Dowbenko

This Zakheim linked company stands to make
a hell of a lot of CASH from The war on terror- GO FIGURE!

Bump

Remote control flight is POSSIBLE.

Amount of evidence this contributes to the claim that remote control planes hit the WTC towers: 0

Logic is ridiculous? People talking about remote-control planes, and buildings constructed with 20 year old demolition charges rigged in them is not ridiculous?

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1154643

How The WTC Was Secretly Demolished On 9-11-01.

The only way to reconcile this analysis inclusive of the 4 Glaring Inconsistencies is that the thick coatings of the rebar of the cast concrete support core and foundation were actually made of plastic explosive C4. This would put enough explosive force in direct contact with the most concrete at high enough pressures and enable the instantaneous structural collapse of each floor consecutively to the ground that we saw, as well as the resulting particulate. Attempting to apply explosives to the exterior of the concrete would have created too much external explosion and made the demo obvious without achieving a fraction of what we saw or see in the sand and gravel of the photos linked above.

This was technology invented in the cold war to make self destruct missile silos and submarine bases, perfect for preplanned demolition. The C4 protected the steel from corrosion before the sea water was evacuated by the incoming concrete into the forms. The C4 was encapsulated in the concrete and its 10 year average shelf life extended by many times.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1154643

How The WTC Was Secretly Demolished On 9-11-01.

The only way to reconcile this analysis inclusive of the 4 Glaring Inconsistencies is that the thick coatings of the rebar of the cast concrete support core and foundation were actually made of plastic explosive C4. This would put enough explosive force in direct contact with the most concrete at high enough pressures and enable the instantaneous structural collapse of each floor consecutively to the ground that we saw, as well as the resulting particulate. Attempting to apply explosives to the exterior of the concrete would have created too much external explosion and made the demo obvious without achieving a fraction of what we saw or see in the sand and gravel of the photos linked above.

This was technology invented in the cold war to make self destruct missile silos and submarine bases, perfect for preplanned demolition. The C4 protected the steel from corrosion before the sea water was evacuated by the incoming concrete into the forms. The C4 was encapsulated in the concrete and its 10 year average shelf life extended by many times.

Ok your credibility just took a nose dive. We are supposed to believe that the WTC towers were actually rigged to explode WHEN THEY WERE CONSTRUCTED? Long before neoconservatives even had a manifesto? Before PNAC? Also did it ever occur to you that rebar is put in buildings FOR A REASON?

I've been gone for two months and come back to find you still droning on and on and on about the same subject. You're the anti-conspiracy theory treefrog of the forum, ceaselessly crawling from one conspiracy theory thread to another, endlessly chirping the same shrill cry. Why is that? What do you think you accomplish? Do you get paid by the word or by the post?

Bump

Remote control flight is POSSIBLE.

Amount of evidence this contributes to the claim that remote control planes hit the WTC towers: 0

Here's why you don't see any debris in that picture: THAT IS ON THE OUTER RING! If you looked at ALL the damage photos you would see that plenty of plane debris was found all over the area, the plane went THROUGH SEVERAL RINGS. This idiotic theory, written hastily by a Frenchman who had seen limited coverage, is not only contradicted by eyewitnesses but the airplane's flight recorder was recovered.

Link us to the damage photos, please.

Also, link us to a picture of the flight recorder being recovered rather than paraded. You understand that the mere existence of a flight recorder proves nothing in dispute - its recovery from a crash site has to be shown.

Looks like just 1 ring to my 20/20's

Bird's eye view. Now where did that commercial airliner run off to?

Da plane, da plane! Oh no boss, dere isn't no plane.

Come on JP, start spinning your dreidle. The fucktards need a degree in...uh...expert plane locating! No credentials! Squawk! No credentials!

Type away boy. You are ridiculous.

Ok your credibility just took a nose dive. We are supposed to believe that the WTC towers were actually rigged to explode WHEN THEY WERE CONSTRUCTED?

Since when did wide-eyed expressions of incredulity become a substitute for an argument?

It does not seem unreasonable that the eventual demolition of the Towers for economic reasons might have been anticipated, and that, for reasons of economy and for the sake of optimal explosive placement, the Towers were rigged like a missile silo when constructed.

I do not insist upon this scenario - I found it interesting that someone else had independently come around to this theory, and I thought that others would be interested in a further exploration per the linked material.

Also did it ever occur to you that rebar is put in buildings FOR A REASON?

It is not evident why you make this remark other than under a misreading of the passage. Your sarcasm smacks of desperation.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1154643

The actual slowdown in construction was when it was revealed by the government agency constructing, and the videographers had to pry for this information, that there was a special anti corrosion, anti vibration resistant coating on the rebar of the concrete core structure. The coating was flammable and special precautions were to be taken, meaning the government would handle the butt welding of the 3 inch vertical bar prior to regular crews running the horizontal minor steel that is tied with wire.

A special crew with armed escorts outside visual screens removed the coating from the bars, beveled the bar ends, welded the bars (welders working on the main steel couldn't be used because they didn't have security clearances) and x-rayed them. After each tier of concrete was poured the welding had to be completed before the concrete forms could be built again.

Keep this concrete core deception in mind because every single web analysis out supporting the official story uses the FEMA information. Floor truss analysis use a different beam system, less, than what was actually in the towers.

The only way to reconcile this analysis inclusive of the 4 Glaring Inconsistencies is that the thick coatings of the rebar of the cast concrete support core and foundation were actually made of plastic explosive C4. This would put enough explosive force in direct contact with the most concrete at high enough pressures and enable the instantaneous structural collapse of each floor consecutively to the ground that we saw, as well as the resulting particulate. Attempting to apply explosives to the exterior of the concrete would have created too much external explosion and made the demo obvious without achieving a fraction of what we saw or see in the sand and gravel of the photos linked above.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1154643

The actual slowdown in construction was when it was revealed by the government agency constructing, and the videographers had to pry for this information, that there was a special anti corrosion, anti vibration resistant coating on the rebar of the concrete core structure. The coating was flammable and special precautions were to be taken, meaning the government would handle the butt welding of the 3 inch vertical bar prior to regular crews running the horizontal minor steel that is tied with wire.

A special crew with armed escorts outside visual screens removed the coating from the bars, beveled the bar ends, welded the bars (welders working on the main steel couldn't be used because they didn't have security clearances) and x-rayed them. After each tier of concrete was poured the welding had to be completed before the concrete forms could be built again.

Keep this concrete core deception in mind because every single web analysis out supporting the official story uses the FEMA information. Floor truss analysis use a different beam system, less, than what was actually in the towers.

I know 2 guys who were EOD specialists in the military. I also know a professional welder with 20 years experience. I'm assured by all three people that your "evidence" is bullshit.

I know 2 guys who were EOD specialists in the military. I also know a professional welder with 20 years experience. I'm assured by all three people that your "evidence" is bullshit.

Very informative - you and your buds got a beer and a belch they also want to share?