"What — me, worry?"

I'm not a scientist or demolition expert, but I watched the entire 9/11 debacle as it happened and as I watched the towers collapsing I thought to myself, "Hey, that looks like when they deliberately implode buildings----straight down---they didn't topple."

It was just a passing thought, but I can't forget it.

Really it's just common sense. You only have to see a couple of the many video clips available. The buildings just fell to pieces. It makes no sense at all.

Some people won't believe water is wet until a properly credentialed expert describes it to them, so this article is still valuable.

We don't know who actually brought them down but my money's on kikes and their helpers.

Why the planes then? If you people think the "official story" which none of you seem to be intimately familiar with, is so ridiculously incredible as you so often claim- WHY DID THEY PUT THAT OUT? Oh of course!!! In conspiracy world the super-powerful and omnipotent shadow agents are both magnificently brilliant yet borderline RETARDED at the same time!!! They fool the NIST engineers but not some brave internet jockey who figured out the whole scam from the comfort of his own home. It is amazing, and tragic, that you people NEVER seem to address that. You are more interested in calling logical people Jews rather than examing your own faulty logic and how that behavior is a major factor keeping White Nationalist views in the margins of American polity.

None of you, not one, have ever addressed even the simplest points about the nature of this conspiracy:

1. If the US government's objective was to kill a massive amount of people, WHY demolish them in a "safe way"? If they didn't care about murdering 3,000 people, why would they care anymore about mudering another 500 or so by letting the buildings topple over.

2. Why use the planes? Nobody has done this since WWII for the most part. The WTC was already bombed via truck bomb once. Why not just demolish the building and claim that "truck bombs were arranged near vital supports?

3. The WTC and Pentagon attacks caused massive damage to our economy, some of which is still being felt today. Israel's existence is dependent on America and America's existence is secured only by a strong economy. There have got to be 100 better, less risky attacks.

4. The US government does not need to kill its own citizens to get us into a war, or impose massive laws on us. Their weapon is the generaly apathy of the American population. Their power is secure due to do the following segments of society:

The General public: Too concerned with football,beer, and Paris Hilton to study geopolitics, history, and his own domestic politics.

Conspiracy nuts: Conspiracy nuts suffer from a sort of mental illness where a great thrill is derived from the fantasy that one is fighting a personal war against a shadowy yet omnipotent group in power be it the "Corporate Fascists", "Communists", "Zionists", "Illuminate". Conspiracy theorists latch on to many REAL political movements from time to time but serve no purpose, hold no ideological beliefs, and have no intention of fighting against the system in real life. They are far more content in their fantasies.

Conspiracy theorists latch on to many REAL political movements from time to time but serve no purpose, hold no ideological beliefs, and have no intention of fighting against the system in real life. They are far more content in their fantasies.

You just described yourself perfectly!

How about YOU document and prove YOUR "conspiracy theories" Mr. Wolfowitz.

You just described yourself perfectly!

How about YOU document and prove YOUR "conspiracy theories" Mr. Wolfowitz.

Wow, way to display your maturity. You should have saved your time and typed in "NO U!" Ladies and gentlemen, behold the adolescent mind of the conspiracy theorist- "Joesixpack". An appropriate name indeed.

Note that you still couldn't address any of those points.

You do realize that your belief that Larry Silverstein pays agents to go on this and other forums to "do his bidding" makes it very likely that you suffer from some form of schizophrenia right?

Okay, now you're a brain surgeon.

I don't know about Silverstein paying anyone, however there are PLENTY of impostors and distorters on the internet whose function is to pump out disinformation to discredit the web as a reliable source of information. Someone is footing the bill, that's sure.

The fact that every time a 911 thread is opened here on VNN and you're on there in a flash discrediting, insulting, ridiculing anyone who has even a slight inclination to regard the 911 fairy tale as suspicious, says something about your motivation.

Your presence discourages people from expressing opinions. Obviously that is what you want.

I wouldn't worry about trying to reason with the JP man. He's the "voice of reason" afterall; the man who knows so much more than any of us shtupid uncredentialed goyim. 9-11 is HIS baby, and none of us better be stepping out of line, or he'll fucktard-and-dumbfuck us until we're back in our places.

And he does have proof afterall. There was a gobermint commission and everything, they even wrote a book which is there in good old American Pie guy Wolfowitz's right hand, which he swore by when in the AmeriKwan high court.

Can you say HIGHEST TREASON?

Get the ropes ready. Any lampost will do.

TV land fantasy for goy consumption = 9-11.

Remember,FDR worked overtime to get the Japanese to attack the US,but he didn't carry out the actual attack himself.Bush/jews may have known about the 9-11 attacks ahead of time and allowed them to happen,but it is unlikely they carried out the attacks themselves.

Standing down NORAD is more than help.

Why did the Neocons try to block, lie to, and slander the 9-11 commission if it was so fake then?

Reverse psychology.

Okay, now you're a brain surgeon.

I don't know about Silverstein paying anyone, however there are PLENTY of impostors and distorters on the internet whose function is to pump out disinformation to discredit the web as a reliable source of information. Someone is footing the bill, that's sure.

The fact that every time a 911 thread is opened here on VNN and you're on there in a flash discrediting, insulting, ridiculing anyone who has even a slight inclination to regard the 911 fairy tale as suspicious, says something about your motivation.

Your presence discourages people from expressing opinions. Obviously that is what you want.

1. I'm not in every 9-11 thread.

2. In the long time that I've been on this board I have not posted on the 9-11 subject until relatively recently and sporadically.

Dr. William Pierce seemed to believe the official story on the 9-11 attack, I guess he was a lemming too huh?

[Slowjewski mode]THOSE that DOUBT the OFFICIAL 911 story are EXACTLY the same as THOSE who DOUBT HOMICIDAL GASCHAMBERS IN AUSCHWITZ!! YOU PROBABLY THINK THE MOON IS MADE OF GREEN CHEESE!!! YOU ARE ALL FUCKTARDS!!! I will NOT reply to ANY ARGUMENT!!![/Slowjewski mode]

[Slowjewski mode]THOSE that DOUBT the OFFICIAL 911 story are EXACTLY the same as THOSE who DOUBT HOMICIDAL GASCHAMBERS IN AUSCHWITZ!! YOU PROBABLY THINK THE MOON IS MADE OF GREEN CHEESE!!! YOU ARE ALL FUCKTARDS!!! I will NOT reply to ANY ARGUMENT!!![/Slowjewski mode]

Wow that's pretty much the EXACT opposite of how I handle these arguments. And as usual, you people still cannot reply to any of MY questions.

Jews don't answer questions directly, they start asking their own detracting questions.

Not one of the arguments of the professor in the first article of this thread has been refuted or even challenged. Jews don't give arguments, they merely try to discredit their opponent.

See http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=25753 for a scientific debate.

Jews don't answer questions directly, they start asking their own detracting questions.

Not one of the arguments of the professor in the first article of this thread has been refuted or even challenged. Jews don't give arguments, they merely try to discredit their opponent.

See http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=25753 for a scientific debate.

Actually several of them were refuted, especially where he says "fire cannot melt steel" BECAUSE THE OFFICIAL EXPLANATION DOES NOT SAY THE CAUSE OF THE COLLAPSE WAS DUE TO FIRE.

And yes, YOU have to answer questions if you advance an alternate theory.

Of course none of you ever do.