...............
If the moderators of these forums do not immediately go to work and cull out these negative anti-European Jews, immigrants and blacks who are provocateurs and poisoners of their European minds, then all Europeans need to leave these forums for their tribal good and not come back here. In that case, we need to start new boards with higher editorial standards than what we find going on here. .......

1. As Pixi and Mike both correctly observed, we dont know who the Jews are. If you think you know, be so kind as to provide a list. One question and I somehow sense you are an expert in this field: Are "true Izraehalites" of CI branded "YHWH" "Jews" to be expelled too?

2. Since Alex is busing finishing TAA3 and doesnt have time to babysit, the official response is NO RULE CHANGES AT VNN.

So, you are now free to say "farewell" again. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000002SMW/104-9913493-7280749?v=glance

I call upon all Europeans to demand that these forums be cleaned up and that anyone posting negative articles about our movement in any manner whatsoever be decommissioned and not allowed to post again.

Behold everyone, the fear of self-examination and criticism. He wants to live in a fantasy world where we all pretend like our great movement is doing just fine when it is clear that it is not. And one of the reasons it is not is due to people like this.

BTW, Pixi, AWESOME response to this guy. The capitalized "AWESOME" impresses you more.

What exactly are you? .....
Or have we got another anti on the forum?

I'd put it on ignore but I can't spell that foreign bullshit!

That "foreign" shit is the Cyrillic alphabet. The name, испанец, is pronounced, "Ee-span-etz."

In Russian it means "Hispanic."

That "foreign" shit is the Cyrillic alphabet. The name, &#1080]

More reason to ignore it.

Imagine: Our Own World...

[color="Sienna"]NO HOPE WITHOUT ROPE

 

Jewspeak comes from Jews and Whites alike.

It occurs whenever the movement is compromised in print on these forums or whenever the New York Times is published.

If a poster helps, say, the New York Times by turning off people in the movement, then that post is a Jewspeak post. Why? Because it serves the Jewish cause--which is the eventual death of the White Race.

The Jews are not so stupid as to allow such discussion within their media properties.

Why, then, do we as Europeans allow our enemies to infiltrate our media?

The answer is because we don't know how to win.

We think we are playing fair this way. But this is not playing fair, because for it to be fair, the New York Times would have to do the same for us and allow us to bring down the Jews in their New York Times, which they won't do.

Why, that being the case, do we Europeans allow Jews with Nordic names to falsely pose as one of us and come in here and defame our groups, our leaders, and our forums?

Is it because we are inferior? Stupid? Gullible?

Our naivete must end now.

We must control our own media here on VNN with the same editorial nenache that the New York Times utilizes to keep us out of their properties.

"nenache", is that Ukranian? What does it mean?

Why, that being the case, do we Europeans allow Jews with Nordic names to falsely pose as one of us and come in here and defame our groups, our leaders, and our forums?

Nice job of completely ignoring the request for a list of the posters on this forum who you deem to be jewish. In fact, that's very jewish of you.

Back to your bridge, troll.

This is not a question of "Trust", and this is not a question of censorship. Not really.

The real issue here is credibility.

Does VNN aspire to be a publisher similar to National Review, or is the goal nothing more that to be opposition to the One Peoples Project.

I believe Mr. Linder could, and should, aspire to take VNN to the level of National Review, or at least an issue specific publication like Musician Magazine.

National Review isn't a worthwhile standard which a White nationalist forum should aim to match. National Review was subverted by Jews a long time ago, when William F. Buckley fell under the spell of Jewish flattery. Joseph Sobran lost his job as an editor there when he tried to publish essays regarding Zionist abuse of US foreign aid and the extent to which the Jews control the politics of America.

VNN is already much better than the National Review in the sense that it is not subverted. The best of the essays posted here are the equal of the best of the essays posted there. Of course, on VNN the diamonds come packed in sand. But you can find them, if you try.

Jerry Abbott

Jewspeak comes from Jews and Whites alike.

It occurs whenever the movement is compromised in print on these forums or whenever the New York Times is published.

If a poster helps, say, the New York Times by turning off people in the movement, then that post is a Jewspeak post. Why? Because it serves the Jewish cause--which is the eventual death of the White Race.

The Jews are not so stupid as to allow such discussion within their media properties.

Why, then, do we as Europeans allow our enemies to infiltrate our media?

The answer is because we don't know how to win.

We think we are playing fair this way. But this is not playing fair, because for it to be fair, the New York Times would have to do the same for us and allow us to bring down the Jews in their New York Times, which they won't do.

Why, that being the case, do we Europeans allow Jews with Nordic names to falsely pose as one of us and come in here and defame our groups, our leaders, and our forums?

Is it because we are inferior? Stupid? Gullible?

Our naivete must end now.

We must control our own media here on VNN with the same editorial nenache that the New York Times utilizes to keep us out of their properties.

Sometimes reading here reminds me of walking past a cage of barking dogs. In fact, this whole forum is a kennel for barking dogs. YAP! YAP! YAP!

I've written dog-bark posts myself. They're full of decisive sounding words about what "must" be done, but they're always vague in the details. That's because those details are illegal details. Of course they are illegal. It is illegal to resist the genocide by the oppressor because the oppressor has the power to write laws. Whereas we have no moral obligation to respect those laws, we don't want to go to prison, so we generally obey them.

Instead of real battle plans, we have amorphous suggestions forever trying to pass as brilliant strategies, or obvious truths masquerading as profound insights. Every bark by a dog sounds very important to the dog who barks it. Those other dogs over there are just making noise.

VNN is not the place to find real rebels. VNN would be at most a diversion, an attempt to make a circus to draw ZOG's eye, prompting their investigators to waste their time and resources trying to find rebels who have no affiliation with us, except for the fact that we would be trying to suggest otherwise by a steady stream of racist yapping.

But there are no such rebels. If you're on VNN, you can't untraceably switch over to illegal doings. The "legals" and the "illegals" must be separate. Funny, everybody seems to want to be a safe, comfortable, loud-mouthed legal, instead of an imperiled, uncomfortable, silent illegal. Talk is cheap.

If you want to be a real rebel, a fighting Nazi soldier, then never post here. We won't mind if you pick up your gear and go blitzkrieging, just don't tell us about it. We don't want a report. We're barking dogs who don't bite, except when we snap at each other. If you want to bite the bear who bites your race, that's up to you.

Jerry Abbott

People around here like to throw the Jew word around when they dont agree with someone.

Jews dilute threads - they try and bury stories by changing the subject

They always bury this story

Sometimes reading here reminds me of walking past a cage of barking dogs. In fact, this whole forum is a kennel for barking dogs. YAP! YAP! YAP!

I've written dog-bark posts myself. They're full of decisive sounding words about what "must" be done, but they're always vague in the details. That's because those details are illegal details. Of course they are illegal. It is illegal to resist the genocide by the oppressor because the oppressor has the power to write laws. Whereas we have no moral obligation to respect those laws, we don't want to go to prison, so we generally obey them.

Instead of real battle plans, we have amorphous suggestions forever trying to pass as brilliant strategies, or obvious truths masquerading as profound insights. Every bark by a dog sounds very important to the dog who barks it. Those other dogs over there are just making noise.

VNN is not the place to find real rebels. VNN would be at most a diversion, an attempt to make a circus to draw ZOG's eye, prompting their investigators to waste their time and resources trying to find rebels who have no affiliation with us, except for the fact that we would be trying to suggest otherwise by a steady stream of racist yapping.

But there are no such rebels. If you're on VNN, you can't untraceably switch over to illegal doings. The "legals" and the "illegals" must be separate. Funny, everybody seems to want to be a safe, comfortable, loud-mouthed legal, instead of an imperiled, uncomfortable, silent illegal. Talk is cheap.

If you want to be a real rebel, a fighting Nazi soldier, then never post here. We won't mind if you pick up your gear and go blitzkrieging, just don't tell us about it. We don't want a report. We're barking dogs who don't bite, except when we snap at each other. If you want to bite the bear who bites your race, that's up to you.

Jerry Abbott

Hey, we've already seen what happens to idiots that take the illegal route. Whether it be some stupid skinhead who throws a molotov cocktail at a Jewish Temple, or some other idiot who robs banks, it all ends up the same.

So Jerry, what the fuck are you doing posting here, or are you one of the loud-mouthed net Nazis? The irony makes me laugh.

Hey, we've already seen what happens to idiots that take the illegal route. Whether it be some stupid skinhead who throws a molotov cocktail at a Jewish Temple, or some other idiot who robs banks, it all ends up the same.

So Jerry, what the fuck are you doing posting here, or are you one of the loud-mouthed net Nazis? The irony makes me laugh.

antiks banned for flaming for a month. Come one back if you think you can hold a civil conversation.

National Review isn't a worthwhile standard which a White nationalist forum should aim to match.

Jerry, I'm surprised at you. I would have thought you'd be the last person to completely miss the point.

I know full well that NR is a neo-con organ. I presented NR as an example of how the enemy maintains credibility in the eyes of the general public.

My main point is that serious and credible (in the eyes of the general public) media publishers don't have this type of "cage of barking dogs" that you mentioned earlier. They don't allow it because it would go a long way toward destroying their credibility with the common man.

If VNN is a "diversion, an attempt to make a circus to draw ZOG's eye" then fine, but I thought it was a recruiting tool.

If VNN wishes to be taken as serious and credible by the general public, Mr. Linder need not change his ideas or presentation, but some thought should be given to just what sort of impression this "circus" leaves on the cable guy that I have "check out" the site.

Like I said, no need to change the content created by Mr. Linder and his select contributors, just moderate the hell out of all the posters and topics that damage the credibility of this media network.

Or do away with the forum all together.