Instead of real battle plans, we have amorphous suggestions forever trying to pass as brilliant strategies, or obvious truths masquerading as profound insights. Every bark by a dog sounds very important to the dog who barks it. Those other dogs over there are just making noise.

All too true.

VNN is not the place to find real rebels. VNN would be at most a diversion, an attempt to make a circus to draw ZOG's eye, prompting their investigators to waste their time and resources trying to find rebels who have no affiliation with us, except for the fact that we would be trying to suggest otherwise by a steady stream of racist yapping.

But there are no such rebels. If you're on VNN, you can't untraceably switch over to illegal doings. The "legals" and the "illegals" must be separate. Funny, everybody seems to want to be a safe, comfortable, loud-mouthed legal, instead of an imperiled, uncomfortable, silent illegal. Talk is cheap.

Exactly. Noone wants to be the one to get their feet wet precisely because it is "imperiled, uncomfortable."

There are other monitored forums to choose from, so let Linder run his the way he sees fits. These forums are open to the public, with some minimal rules (such as in regards to flaming) and seem to run well. If secret Jews can sway you from the path of White resistance here, then perhaps you aren't serious in your commitment to racial survival. After all, the influences on you in the real world are much stronger than anything you'll experience here.

As for no criticism of White leaders, how do you separate the wheat from the chaff? There needs to be one forum where the various organizations can be discussed without censorship. That is how people can assess the effectiveness and integrity of those groups.

Remember, the VNN forums aren't the real world and shouldn't be the focus of your life. What counts is the activism which you do off the computer. That is where results count, not preaching to the converted or bandying words with the untermenschen on VNN .

As for the New York Times not printing pro-WN articles, well, I doubt if the Aryan Alternative will be printing anti-White articles, either. What really matters is that the people behind the scenes of VNN are dedicated White racial activists. When the time is right for a more restrictive means of communication between White activists, I am sure that such a forum will develop with appropriate procedures to keep out the unwanted.

The Warlord

People around here like to throw the Jew word around when they dont agree with someone.

Actually it's very similar to everywhere else when you suggest a difference between the race and immediately you are labeled "racist" as a quick way to end debate. Just on VNN "racist" is substituded with "jew" for anyone that falls outside the approved zietgiest.

This isn't a slight on VNN because many on here are open-minded enough to handle some amount of divergent opinion.

Actually it's very similar to everywhere else when you suggest a difference between the race and immediately you are labeled "racist" as a quick way to end debate. Just on VNN "racist" is substituded with "jew" for anyone that falls outside the approved zietgiest.

This isn't a slight on VNN because many on here are open-minded enough to handle some amount of divergent opinion.

People naturally form groups, come to a consensus. Carl Schmitt talked about this in a book I am reading called "Crisis of Parliamentary Systems" or something like that. He talked about "the other" as a key to group forming consciousness.

People naturally form groups, come to a consensus. Carl Schmitt talked about this in a book I am reading called "Crisis of Parliamentary Systems" or something like that. He talked about "the other" as a key to group forming consciousness.

As another poster pointed out, WN began with the popularity of the internet, as different groups and orgs are able to bond to a degree (from VNN'ers, skinheads, Stormfronters, KKK members) and some quasi-WN groups such as Amren. As such, the ideology is a bit fractuous. In time it might solidify into a large, viable political movement but large political movements can be sloppy.

Most true conservatives have jettisoned the Republican Party, for example.

That "foreign" shit is the Cyrillic alphabet. The name, &#1080]

Actually is means "Spaniard" so he is probably white if that is his nationality.

Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!

 

Jewspeak comes from Jews and Whites alike.

Explain this "Jewspeak", because if you have ever read the writing of Jews, even the radical ones, you would see that they tend to draw a lot of their inspiration and quotes from Aryan sources such as Nietzsche, Hegel(Marx got a lot from Hegel), Jefferson, etc. It is the interpretation of these sources that is often corrupted.

It occurs whenever the movement is compromised in print on these forums or whenever the New York Times is published.

Huh?

If a poster helps, say, the New York Times by turning off people in the movement, then that post is a Jewspeak post. Why? Because it serves the Jewish cause--which is the eventual death of the White Race.

In case you didn't notice, the New York Times is pretty much world-famous(or infamous) You are trying to compare a specific thing, in this case a newspaper, to something nebulous- namely that which is currently a political/ideological subculture. That simply doesn't work.

The Jews are not so stupid as to allow such discussion within their media properties.

Actually they tend to highlight the more ignorant, sensational, or paranoid(such as this thread) outbursts from "the movement" to support their stereotype of the "crazy racist nutjob".

Why, then, do we as Europeans allow our enemies to infiltrate our media?

We don't really HAVE a media right now.

The answer is because we don't know how to win.

BEAUTIFUL, someone that KNOWS how to win!!! Let me guess, the COMPLETE strategy for "winning" fits nicely into a series of forum posts.

We think we are playing fair this way. But this is not playing fair, because for it to be fair, the New York Times would have to do the same for us and allow us to bring down the Jews in their New York Times, which they won't do.

So to be "fair" the New York Times is supposed to let "us"(by which I mean "you") walk into their main office(or any offices) and "bring down the Jews there"? I don't see the New York Times coming to WN gatherings and "bringing us down". And do you actually believe that after the Jews that work for that paper or ANY media outlet there will be nobody left that is diametrically opposed to White Nationalism?

Why, that being the case, do we Europeans allow Jews with Nordic names to falsely pose as one of us and come in here and defame our groups, our leaders, and our forums?

We don't need "Jews with Nordic names"(Is PanzerRaHowa 14/88 a 'Nordic name'?) to bring down "our groups" or "our leaders". "Our leaders" have proven themselves adept at doing just that.

Is it because we are inferior? Stupid? Gullible?

Our naivete must end now.

We must control our own media here on VNN with the same editorial nenache that the New York Times utilizes to keep us out of their properties.

Our paranoia and fear must end now. Anyone who is convinced his ideology's moral correctness is not afraid to face the attacks of opposing ideologies. Anyone that IS afraid is a moral coward who wishes to live in a fantasy world. Tell me, how are the "Jews posing as Nordics" any more damaging than the open Jewish antis, non-white antis, or white antis? Or do you actually believe that Jews and predominately Jews are the only people who would want to give a racialist forum grief?

antiks banned for flaming for a month. Come one back if you think you can hold a civil conversation.

Geezus yer cranky today, AE!