Conservatives are good people in the everyday sense. But they are vain and fearful. Jews know how to work both of these - their status fears.

They appeal to their intellectual vanity by telling that explanations of our woes (we all basically hate the same things, if we're not leftist) that focus on jews are too simplistic, whereas their jew-evading or -minimizing explanations are sophisticated and nuanced. This flatters their intellectual vanity.

They appeal to their status fears. They avoid arguments, or merely state WN positions and then gurn to say OMG do you want to be associated iwth THAT in a grown-male valley-girl way. The conservative is very concerned with appearances, keeping them up, how he looks to others, what others think of him.

Here's an example of them trying to "shame" Kathy Schaidle (a rather twatty non-jew at takimag who neverthless produces some decent stuff, if lite, actually, on the jewsplanations):

Skeptic1972 Kathy Shaidle • a day ago
Ms. Shaidle, I read and often admire your outspoken ("By whom?" -- Dorothy Parker) columns on, for example, PJ Media and elsewhere. How can you, or Dr. Dalrymple for that matter, lend your good name and reputation to this disgusting web site?

Are you aware that you are posting articles together with, for example, David "The holocaust never happened" Cole, John "darkies are mentally inferior and perhaps women shouldn't vote" Derbyshire, Pat "no gas vans" Buchanan, Steve "Jews control the world" Sailer, Jim "wife-beating ex-con" Goad, and others on the same moral and intellectual level, all headed by Taki "I hope the fascists take over Greece" Theodoracopulos? Do you really want to be associated with this bunch?

It is no wonder this web site comments' section is a watering hole (perhaps a dung pile would be a better metaphor) for every KKK-wannabe, neo-Nazi, and holocaust denier out there who is looking for some pseudo-"respectability". It is you and Dalrymple's and a (very) few others who, for some mysterious reason, provide the flimsy cover of "respetability" to what is, in effect, an internet neo-Nazi or KKK web site with better graphics and a larger vocabulary.

Why do you do this? Surely it's not the money, and I find it hard to believe you would consider it worthy to spit in Goad's or Cole's (to name two) face if it was on fire.