I make this distinction for the following reason. If someone declares themself a leader and convinces others to follow him, people will always wait till tomorrow for something to happen. When there is no momentum and 5 years pass something is clearly wrong with the tactics of said leader.

I am not against Duke. I wrote him a letter of support while he was in prison and sent many donations to help fund his cause. I have found, over time, that he was not creating a foundation for white Americans to really build upon. All of these other countries where he is trying to create unity are important , don't get me wrong, but as an American I would expect him to support local WN groups here in this country and build unity here. We have many groups here; why won't he strive for unity in this fashion? I happen to know for a fact he gives the high hat to other leaders who are worthy of our respect.

Expressing certain concerns against a person does not necessarily mean you are against them. But, as a white who desires the establishment of white living space I feel I should be responsible for understanding the direction (or lack thereof) educators/leaders are promoting. Yes, Duke is a great educator but, as I said before, a leader is something entirely different. A leader, in my opinion, is like the general of an army. He is right down there in the trenches with his troops. Duke on more than a few occasions has turned his nose up at people who were in the trenches and taking fire. I won't go into examples because I'm sure whatever name I mention to justify my statement will probably be attacked in one capacity or another.

Stormfront is basically advised by Duke and it's temperment is dictated as such. I'm sure Linder wouldn't have a problem if I promoted stormfront right here and right now. Try to advertise Chain's Kingston Adventure over on stormfront; The post will be deleted. To me, this is a sign of poor leadership and issues which go beyond competition.

Look, the furthest thing I want is dissention amongst our people. This is a Duke thread and these are my honest opinions about his style of doing things. I think there should be a clear and distinct line drawn between a leader and an educator. I don't think it cuts it to claim to be both. His form of activism is education although he (and many others) consider him a leader; I simply disagree with this in regards to America. He does not create solutions for us here in America and those people wanting to see results will continue to wait. I feel those persons would be better to find leadership elsewhere but definitely buy his books. I'm not slandering the man only addressing an issue which I feel needs to be addressed in an open, honest and sober fashion.

David is interested in David - bottom line. His Euro org is just a paper org nothing more. Don't get me wrong, he is a very talented individual, but thats all he is an individual not a leader. Maybe he made that decision long ago, and sees he can make the best impact the way he is doing. Yet his impact would be a lot more powerful if he lead a WN political party registered in all 50 states.

David is interested in David - bottom line. His Euro org is just a paper org nothing more. Don't get me wrong, he is a very talented individual, but thats all he is an individual not a leader. Maybe he made that decision long ago, and sees he can make the best impact the way he is doing. Yet his impact would be a lot more powerful if he lead a WN political party registered in all 50 states.

David is interested in David - bottom line. His Euro org is just a paper org nothing more. Don't get me wrong, he is a very talented individual, but thats all he is an individual not a leader. Maybe he made that decision long ago, and sees he can make the best impact the way he is doing. Yet his impact would be a lot more powerful if he lead a WN political party registered in all 50 states.

David is interested in David - bottom line. His Euro org is just a paper org nothing more. Don't get me wrong, he is a very talented individual, but thats all he is an individual not a leader. Maybe he made that decision long ago, and sees he can make the best impact the way he is doing. Yet his impact would be a lot more powerful if he lead a WN political party registered in all 50states.

David is interested in David - bottom line. His Euro org is just a paper org nothing more. Don't get me wrong, he is a very talented individual, but thats all he is an individual not a leader. Maybe he made that decision long ago, and sees he can make the best impact the way he is doing. Yet his impact would be a lot more powerful if he lead a WN political party registered in all 50states.

The forum is acting up.

The forum is acting up.

Why is that? A little healthy constructive criticism among friends can go a long way. No one is saying Duke is a jew or an agent of zog. The proper resources should go to the proper individuals, that's all...

Why is that? A little healthy constructive criticism among friends can go a long way.

I think he means the forum itself, not the participants.
I've noticed this today as well - from double and triple
posts to the main forum page not being updated with
new posts.

I think he means the forum itself, not the participants.
I've noticed this today as well - from double and triple
posts to the main forum page not being updated with
new posts.

Gotcha, thanks for the translation

I think he means the forum itself, not the participants.
I've noticed this today as well - from double and triple
posts to the main forum page not being updated with
new posts.

That is what I meant.

Duke would not, and should not, pair with someone who has controversial suggestions. A healthy dialectic here would be just that.

If you're not actively doing politics by other means, you may as well do politics by the traditional means. But that's my POV because 'das how iz roll, nukka.

Zog-media: how are they successful ? Team-work. An army of media-troops where they plug eachothers layer upon layer of information to widen the audience.Like peeling an onion for answers, zog-media continually shifts its message one layer at a time,creating a vast net-work of mainstream-media for desire result.

song-lyrics:

Come in here, dear boy, have a cigar. You're gonna go far, fly high,
You're never gonna die, you're gonna make it if you try;they're gonna love you.
Well I've always had a deep respect, and I mean that most sincerely.
The band is just fantastic, that is really what I think. Oh by the way,
which one's Pink?
And did we tell you the name of the game, boy, we call it Riding the
Gravy Train.

We're just knocked out. We heard about the sell out. You gotta get an
album out,
You owe it to the people. We're so happy we can hardly count.
Everybody else is just green, have you seen the chart?
It's a helluva start, it could be made into a monster if we all pull together
as a team.
And did we tell you the name of the game, boy, we call it Riding the
Gravy Train.

Zog-media: how are they successful ? Team-work. An army of media-troops where they plug eachothers layer upon layer of information to widen the audience.Like peeling an onion for answers, zog-media continually shifts its message one layer at a time,creating a vast net-work of mainstream-media for desire result.

song-lyrics:

Come in here, dear boy, have a cigar. You're gonna go far, fly high,
You're never gonna die, you're gonna make it if you try]

That's exactly correct. Jews could hate each other but still never cross one another. You've got rabbinical jews working with atheist jews who work with military jews. Even when they do attack each other it's usually for show and for the purpose of public comsumption; usually to make it LOOK like their not united...
BTW, nice use of a floyd lyric.

Your fathers, mothers, daughters, sons
Have been taken by the chosen ones
But don't you forget you made the choice,
You made your mark, you raised your voice,
They're all the same, you're all to blame
You're dogs!

 

Should we toss out our toilet paper because David Duke recommends it?

Oddly enough, Duke used the same analogy when he was on Hesham Tillawi’s show to discuss the Walt/Mearsheimer study.