So are you saying for us to vote for Kerry the jew?

If so you are from the "worse is better" camp. Be prepared for a lot of criticism.

I frankly don't care because I'm going to renounce my citizenship and move out of the usa... Nobody wants to fight so I won't either... and I don't believe votes count... unless they are the ones w/ bullets.

So are you saying for us to vote for Kerry the jew?

If so you are from the "worse is better" camp. Be prepared for a lot of criticism.

I frankly don't care because I'm going to renounce my citizenship and move out of the usa... Nobody wants to fight so I won't either... and I don't believe votes count... unless they are the ones w/ bullets.

Do you understand what stamina and stratagem and endurance are all about?

My battle plan has been cleared with the best military minds in the country. Seriously.

Jim, your tactic of voting for the kike Kerry does have merit. I planned on not voting for either, but you have me re-thinking.

So long as the so-called "Conservative" republicans can take White male voters for granted, they'll never do anything pro-White. Why should they? There is no political advantage to do so since they already have "us".

If Kerry and the Democrats win big in November, the Republicans will be forced to change stategy. Their new strategy might just include a far more pro-White position on issues such as immigration, affirmative action, abortion, NAFTA, and the anti-white media, in order to increase their 70 percent White male vote to 80 or 90 percent. Who knows? They might even start uttering the words "White Rights" for the first time in decades.

And your conclusion that it's better to fight one Party than two (should the Republican party virtually collapse), is correct.

And there's always the possibility, minute though it be, that White gentile republicans will turn against Israel and the jews, if they lose big in November.

I'm glad to hear you are re-thinking your position but I do not believe that the Republican party will EVER change. That possibility presupposes independence of ZOG which is simply not the case. BTW, there are two pro-white political leaders in America.

www.jameshartforcongress.com

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,127932,00.html

Racist Wins GOP House NominationFriday, August 06, 2004
MEMPHIS, Tenn. — An unabashed racist will represent the Republican party in the November election for a congressional seat after a write-in candidate failed to derail his effort.

With 86 percent of the primary vote counted Thursday, write-in candidate Dennis Bertrand (search) had just 1,554 votes compared to 7,671, or 83 percent, for James L. Hart (search), a believer in the discredited, phony science of eugenics.

In November, the GOP candidate will oppose Rep. John Tanner, a Democrat who has represented the northwest Tennessee district for 15 years.

Hart, 60, vows if elected to work toward keeping "less favored races" from reproducing or immigrating to the United States. In campaign literature, Hart contends that "poverty genes" threaten to turn the United States into "one big Detroit."

"I didn't expect to win," Hart said. "I thought their network would beat my ideas."

He has run for the 8th District seat before and drawn little attention. But people began to notice this time because he was the only Republican on the ballot.

Since the deadline for getting on the ballot had passed, Bertrand, also a Republican, began a write-in campaign, saying he wanted to protect the party's honor.

Both Jim Giles and Rounder convinced me. It did take some time and hard thinking. I'd never thought I'd see the day that voting a democrat jew would be good, but it is the best option now.

The good people in Tennessee should of course vote republican for James Hart.

Don't worry, jew Kohn promised he wanted the American army to fight and die for Israel too.

I have expressed very similar logic on several other posts here at VNN. I agree with Giles.

The Naitonal Alliance and all other pro-white organizations saw dramtic growth while Bill Clinton was in office. Growth declined or even reversed during the Reagan and Bush Sr. presidencies. The same thing has happened since Dubya was elected.

The Democrats are at least honest about what they believe and what they stand for: federally enforced multi-racialism at home and Zionism abroad. All white working and middle-class voters understand this, or at least the mult-racialist agenda. However, very few average whites understand that the Republicans are just as anti-white as the Democrats. Most white voters just assume that the Republican Party has become the defacto party for white people; and although the party leaders deny this publicly, the average white believes that the fix is really in and Republicans secretly represent white values and interests. Most southern whites believe this lie.

Well, Giles is right. As long as the Republicans continue to win the presidency, or are at least contenders for the white house, very few whites will respond to a truly pro-white organization or party, just as very few of them voted for Pat Buchanan in 2000. In order to support an openly pro-white movement, whites must first believe that a vote for the Republicans is a vote thrown away... because the Republicans are losers and can no longer win. Let's help make it so.

Also, Kerry and Edwards and the rest of the Democrats will really rub whitey's face in nigger shit and Mexican shit, etc.; maybe whites will begin to get sick of it with the Democrats in power. And after a few election cycles of repeated Republican losses at the polls, average whites will be much more willing to support a truly radical pro-white alternative.

Also, we need to break the power of the looney Christian right on the Republican Party, especially at the grassroots. We must show that by themselves, the nutball Christians to not have the numbers and clout to lead the Republican Party to victory... that the nutballs can only lead us to defeat and ruin... and that only the issue of race will suffice to unite our people into a political phalanx with the power to win.

Right now we need neo-cons in the White House. They spread the military thinner and thinner, while wasting money on every needlessly expensive, potentionally dangerous military project that comes down the pipe. They will speed up the demise of the system.

Wrong. They are viewed as being pro-white. That's why they must go, NOW!

Don't worry, jew Kohn promised he wanted the American army to fight and die for Israel too.

Absolutely right. J.P. Slovjanski illustrates the problem. J.P. Slovjanski thinks there is a difference in the two parties on THE ISSUE, ZIONISM.

I have expressed very similar logic on several other posts here at VNN. I agree with Giles.

The Naitonal Alliance and all other pro-white organizations saw dramtic growth while Bill Clinton was in office. Growth declined or even reversed during the Reagan and Bush Sr. presidencies. The same thing has happened since Dubya was elected.

The Democrats are at least honest about what they believe and what they stand for: federally enforced multi-racialism at home and Zionism abroad. All white working and middle-class voters understand this, or at least the mult-racialist agenda. However, very few average whites understand that the Republicans are just as anti-white as the Democrats. Most white voters just assume that the Republican Party has become the defacto party for white people]If you are truly informed and truly pro-white, this conclusion is a no brainer.

http://www.workingforwhites.net

 

I have no idea what I am going to do this November. I have never failed to vote since I first voted in Texas in 1966. I was 19 in 1964, but you had to be 21 to vote back then.

If Bush is re-elected this year, the US and therefore the world will embark on an experiment in pure lunacy on a scale like never seen before. it will be a science fiction novel come true --- a lot like “1984,” only more technology.

Well, maybe not. In “1984” the Inner Party was in control of the wars. The real Inner Party may foment some wars for which they are not prepared. Or, I could be wrong on this. We are just now finding out that the USSR/USA cold war was totally phony, a set-up from start to finish. Maybe the China/North Korea/Iran/Russia/Europe/USA interplay is just as phony, all set up. Sorry, I’m rambling.

If Kerry is elected, the same thing, only slower. The “Party,” the one American Party, shows one of its two faces to the people, with the motive to keep them placid. Right now I can’t tell who the Inner Party has decided fits this role best.

I’ve never not voted, but maybe this year.

Enkidu

I have no idea what I am going to do this November. I have never failed to vote since I first voted in Texas in 1966. I was 19 in 1964, but you had to be 21 to vote back then.
.......I&#8217]
What about Ralph Nader?

 

Casper posts here now? Let the republicanization begin.

...

What about Ralph Nader?

Not impossible.

This from some web page I found:

"The Nader-Camejo ticket has, however, made the ballot in Florida, Michigan, Mississippi, Colorado, Kansas, Montana and possibly Nevada.:

I have nothing against Nader. Might be kind of fun. I could still vote, and not have to feel like the POS I would be if I voted Democrat or Republican.

Sure, why not.

Enkidu

I have no idea what I am going to do this November. I have never failed to vote since I first voted in Texas in 1966. I was 19 in 1964, but you had to be 21 to vote back then.

If Bush is re-elected this year, the US and therefore the world will embark on an experiment in pure lunacy on a scale like never seen before. it will be a science fiction novel come true --- a lot like “1984,” only more technology.

Well, maybe not. In “1984” the Inner Party was in control of the wars. The real Inner Party may foment some wars for which they are not prepared. Or, I could be wrong on this. We are just now finding out that the USSR/USA cold war was totally phony, a set-up from start to finish. Maybe the China/North Korea/Iran/Russia/Europe/USA interplay is just as phony, all set up. Sorry, I’m rambling.

If Kerry is elected, the same thing, only slower. The “Party,” the one American Party, shows one of its two faces to the people, with the motive to keep them placid. Right now I can’t tell who the Inner Party has decided fits this role best.

I’ve never not voted, but maybe this year.

Enkidu

The fact remains as pro-whites we can take out the Democrats more easily than the Republicans so we must install the Democrats.