Here's irony for ya'. Jim was the "other" candidate till recently. Wanted our vote. Now he wants us to vote for one of the two parties. Now for the irony, in his own poll, "other" is winning. This group wants an "other", even in the face of asking us to vote demo. There's a clue.

It shows the VNN members think for themselves.

Reminds me of the last order Hitler gave to Goebbels, to flee the city of Berlin and continue to fight elsewhere. Although obeying the order would have been the best thing to do both politically and personally, the good doctor refused.

Anyway I am most concerned about the few VNN members that still want to vote for Bush. The only way I could rationalize that is they are hoping that a Bushite presidency of 2004-2008 will really fuck things up and destroy the Republicunts.

If you don't vote for Kerry, you're helping Bush win re-election.

let me stop for a second all this worse is better shit. sometimes worse is worser.

Presidential politics-- worse is better. no vote is one thing, nader vote, kerry, who cares. you have so little say your opinion is fucking irrelevant. bush-kerry are one candidate when it comes to izrahell.

federal elections? That depends, but again, if the numbers are big enough, you can vote better by not voting.

State? Here we get to the place where votes may start making some kind of difference.

Local? Big fucking difference.

At the local level, if you let democrats take over, you would watch life slip into a living hell with little hope of recovery. Try putting niggers in charge of sewer systems for example. Will the "White revolution" suddenly happen if lots of us die from typhus? I doubut it.

Try and be a little more thoughtful folks. Sometimes voting itself is a vote for the system and the most revolutionary act is not voting; other times, you're just asking for trouble. Consider what the election matters are you're voting upon. If you go in the booth, you do have the choice of pulling some levers and not all.

Please, everybody that reacts to this thread, read all of it.

The argument to vote Demonrat is not that worse is better, but that the Republicunt Party has to be destroyed.

I read it all, I'm just doing what politicians do-- answering somebody else's question with whatever I'd like to say! LOL

anybody remember Alex Curtis? He used to talk about elections quite a bit.

If you think "worse is better", thing getting so shitty that they will lead to a "revolution"...you should definately vote for Bush. However, if you goal is the gradual destruction of the republican party and replacing it with a more ethnocentric one, then you should vote for Kerry.

...

I read it all, I'm just doing what politicians do-- answering somebody else's question with whatever I'd like to say! LOL

anybody remember Alex Curtis? He used to talk about elections quite a bit.

Yes, I remember him. Another example that ZOG doesn't tolerate freedom of speech.

The argument to vote Demonrat is not that worse is better, but that the Republicunt Party has to be destroyed.

Precisely.

Jim,

Is that your answer to my post #43?

I kinda understand but it still smacks of SLOW change and partisian politics. Are you wanting to hijack the Rep. party to attract a group of whites unwilling to vote 3rd party? Maybe it will work but I still say that those people can be swayed w/ us owning our own network TV... Maybe both.

Democrats in the White House and in control of both houses of Congress will hasten the collapse of the economy, thereby cause The Race War to come sooner than later. And since the jews and mongrels get stronger and more numerous every day, the sooner The Race War begins, the better our chances of winning it. Simple logic.

Besides, I'm getting old and therefore want the "balloon to go up" sooner than later so I won't be too GD old to pull a trigger when it does go up. Simple logic.

So vote for Kerry for my sake. Sieg Heil!!!

Yes, I think there will be some serious changes in the U.S. economy, and therefore the world economy, when Whites are in the minority. Brazil North doesn't make a very good economic engine, and that cold wind of poverty will make a lot of fence sitters wake up fast. Because as we know, there is a very large number of Whites who understand that the dark races are no good, but who go along with the establishment as long as it is the best choice for their personal economy. When that's no longer the case, that's when nationalism comes.

A good reason not to vote for Republicans, as the slide is a little slower then, and there's the case of the frog in boiling water and all that.

If we look at the neocon projects in the Middle East, what we have now is a situation where leftists think the wars are conservative business as usual, a case of evil White racists killing non-Whites for oil. That's no good. If part-Jew Kerry wins and continues the wars, or at least the present occupations, then they can't say that it's a Republican thing, and would have to do a little more digging. Best of all would be if some neocons went back to the Democrats -- then you could really point out the real culprits, and say look, it's not a case of Republican or Democrat politics, it's a case of Jewish politics!

Also, as the occupation of Iraq turns more and more sour it would be much better to not have a Republican in charge, as that seems to prevent a great deal of Whites from criticizing the neocon wars. With a Democrat in the White House it would be much easier to educate them on the neocons -- in Europe too, where some nationalists really believe the Reps are warring on the hated Arabs out of racist reasons, which they think is good.

So will Bushie or Kerry win? What seems most likely?

Would it matter if the republicunts party is destoryed when the real power behind the two front phoney system parties still stands.

That's what I'm trying to tell everybody but the Shadow govt Dem/Rep. puppet show is so strong it even hypnotizes the WNists at VNN.

Coke and Pepsi folks.

If we look at the neocon projects in the Middle East, what we have now is a situation where leftists think the wars are conservative business as usual, a case of evil White racists killing non-Whites for oil. That's no good. If part-Jew Kerry wins and continues the wars, or at least the present occupations, then they can't say that it's a Republican thing, and would have to do a little more digging. Best of all would be if some neocons went back to the Democrats -- then you could really point out the real culprits, and say look, it's not a case of Republican or Democrat politics, it's a case of Jewish politics!

This is exactly the issue that pisses me off so much with the leftists.

The far-leftists (think Michael Moore) believe that there is some "vast right-wing conspiracy" and that Bush is some evil racist monster who wishes to destroy "brown people" as they love calling them. But as every person on this board knows, Bush a moron, a mere dancing monkey for the Zionist Jews who are pulling the strings on him. He is too stupid and slow-witted to think of such a devious plot. Maybe when Kerry continues the war for Zion the leftists will stop and scratch their heads, and come to their senses.

So will Bushie or Kerry win? What seems most likely?

As I said earlier in this thread, I think Kerry will win and it won't even be very close in the electoral college. Bush won last year by, what, 5 electoral votes? What has he done that is so great for America? He surely hasn't gained ground, in fact, many Republicans are turning against him. I heard that this may be the first year that the majority of the military votes Democratic. There are about 1 million people in our armed forces, and the reservists and National Guard troops, who are doing the majority of the dying in Iraq, are pissed as hell. In Bush's day, the National Guard was like a get-out of war free card.

I think Kerry will win all the states that Gore did, and a few more. The two that I see definitely going to Kerry are Ohio and Florida, both of which went narrowly to Bush in 2000. In Florida, the old Jewish ladies of Palm Beach County will remember to how to punch the butterfly ballets, and Ohio has lost millions of jobs since the narrow Republican win in 2000, and their economy is in the shitter. Ohio and Florida command 47 electoral votes combined, which would be more than enough to sink Bush even if he mounts a comeback in comparatively puny New Mexico or Oregon. I saw in the latest Newsweek issue that the "spotlight" state was my state, PA. If Bush thinks he will win here, he is dreaming. We now have a Democrat Jew Governor (Ed Rendell) and that sissy-boy RINO Jew (Arlen Specter) with a voting record on par with Kerry is one of our "Republican" Senators. He doesn't have a chance here. Also, a number of states have a moderate to good chance of going to Kerry (but not definitely). These include Arizona, Nevada, Missouri, West Virginia, and North and South Carolina. I believe at least two of these will fall to the Dems this year. There is no reason for Kerry to lose any states that Gore carried; no matter how much the Jews media make it seem like a fair race, everyone now knows Bush is a moron and a fuck-up. I also think Jewry will unite behind Kerry this year (which is no small advantage). The neocons will jump ship and become hawkish liberals. William Kristol, the son of neocon Jew founder Irving Kristol, has openly stated this. They know that Americans are sniffing the foul trail left by neocon Jews Wolfie & Co. in the Bush administration, and getting a Dem in the White House will put off the scent, at least for a while.

As I said earlier, the Jews Media is hyping this election, but I don't even think it will be close. They just want everyone to vote Republican or Democrat, and avoid all third parties (Dems: Nader; Repubs: Peroutka). You heard it here; and I don't claim to be a political analyst, but expect a Kerry victory by at least 70 electoral votes.

But Jim Giles has an intereresting strategy: to sink the Repubs and build up a new opponent for the Dems. It will either work marvelously or completely backfire; nobody can be entirely sure at this point.

Would it matter if the republicunts party is destoryed when the real power behind the two front phoney system parties still stands.

Ah! I should have checked out this thread much earlier. Took the words right out of my mouth . . .