Fredrik Hearne and King Tiger have both made excellent posts.

Hearne points out that putting Kerry in office will change nothing regarding our war for Israel in the middle east, and perhaps this will open the minds of many non-Jewish leftists in the Democratic Party. These people tend to be somewhat smarter than the average conservative Republican. Maybe then, as Hearne says, these people will see that we don't have so-called right-wingers like Bush and company who hate "brown people". Maybe they will see who really is pushing for war: the Zionists, Jews first, and their supporters.

Ultimately we need white liberals and white conservatives to come to a common understanding of the Jew, our true enemy... sorta like what is beginning to happen now with Nader and Pat Buchanan getting cozy and chummy.

King Tiger's prediction that Kerry will win going away is sound. I see this, too. The Democrats are united and energized and hate Bush. They will turn out in even greater numbers than they did for Gore. In contrast, many white working-class so-called conservatives are greatly disappointed with Bush. Almost half of these people now see the war in Iraq was a stupid blunder. Many of them have lost good-paying jobs since Bush went in. They see how Bush has kissed Mexicans' asses and thrown open the borders, too, which dismays them. They see Bush pushing free trade with China, Mexico, India, etc. They see Bush doing nothing for white people. While few of these people may vote for the Massachusetts liberal Kerry, a lot of them will just stay home and not bother to vote this time. These people are confused and feel betrayed, and they see nothing worth voting for. This is what will do Bush in: apathy from working and middle-class white voters... with the exception of the Christian nutballs.

As I stated and as others have stated, the real issue here is to destroy the Republican Party. Why?
1. Average whites understand that Democrats represent the intersests of non-whites and queers and are blatantly hostile to white interests.
2. Many whites (especially southern whites) have the mistaken notion that conservative Republicans are secretly pro-white.
3. Therefore, we must simplify things for these whites by getting rid of the phony pro-white conservative Republicans. Republicans must lose so often that whites understand that a vote for Republicans is a vote wasted. Whites must instead be confronted with an essentially neo-Marxist Democratic Party that openly hates them and persecutes them. This will unify whites, provoke a sense of racial identity, and ultimately lead to a real opposition movement of some consequence.

And while many people have rightly scoffed at the idea that average whites will wake up and become radicalized overnight (they won't, I agree!) a minority will. And this minority will find its way into pro-white organizations like the NA or Duke's organization, etc. As I pointed out earlier, pro-white organizations always grow when the blatant liberals are in power; they always atrophy when Republicans are in power.

Yes, it will be a small minority of whites who will form the core of the white resistance, but this small minority must be many times larger than the one we have today, and the best way to attract and recruit this larger minority of radicalized whites will be when ne-Marxist-white-hating Democrats are in total control and the phony conservative Republicans are discredited as losers. Whites must have two clear choices: an openly anti-white party and an openly pro-white movement (and ultimately party).

The longer the Republicans remain in the game, the longer it will be before reach this final vital stage.

And a final observation, one that others have correctly pointed out, the Jewish neo-cons will quickly dump the Republicans and join the Kerry administration. They will be happier there anyway. And from that vantage they will finally let the misguided Christian Zionests know exactly what they (the Jews) think of them by launching an attack on them in order to break their present political power. This will perhaps educate some of these Christians about the true nature of their beloved Jews and may eventually make it possible for pro-white whites to work with some white Christians in a common front against the Jews. The degenerate Jews truly despise the Christian Evangelicals, and they despise having to work with them. They would love nothing more than to launch an assault on the Christians and form tighter alliances with their true allies the queers and muds.

Since most whites think the repub. party is secretly the party for Whites, we must destroy said party.?????? How about infiltrating the repub. party, and then shout, "yeah, you know you need to vote White!"
Maybe I'm not the best to comment. Both just different flavors of poison Kool-Aid to me.

Since most whites think the repub. party is secretly the party for Whites, we must destroy said party.?????? How about infiltrating the repub. party, and then shout, "yeah, you know you need to vote White!"
Maybe I'm not the best to comment. Both just different flavors of poison Kool-Aid to me.

The Jews and their allies and the big-money crowd will never allow any such infiltration. David Duke has certainly tried this approach, and look what and where it got him. Even when he won political office and attracted record numbers of white voters, Bush Sr. and other top Repubs denounced him.

Or, just try going to your local Republican meeting and push a pro-white agenda. You will be quickly shown the door and not allowed re-entry.

The only way for an openly pro-white infiltration and takeover of the Republican Party to work would require a clear string of disasterous defeats to befall the GOP. Only from such desperation would it be possible to change the party. And before this softening up of the party can take place, we must all do our part to see that the present incarnation of the party loses, and loses and loses.

But if in the future it becomes possible for us to take over the GOP, then by all means we should do so. This would possibly be an easier and surer way to white victory than building a new party.

But again, it is not possible today.

The Jews and their allies and the big-money crowd will never allow any such infiltration. David Duke has certainly tried this approach, and look what and where it got him. Even when he won political office and attracted record numbers of white voters, Bush Sr. and other top Repubs denounced him.

Or, just try going to your local Republican meeting and push a pro-white agenda. You will be quickly shown the door and not allowed re-entry.

The only way for an openly pro-white infiltration and takeover of the Republican Party to work would require a clear string of disasterous defeats to befall the GOP. Only from such desperation would it be possible to change the party. And before this softening up of the party can take place, we must all do our part to see that the present incarnation of the party loses, and loses and loses.

But if in the future it becomes possible for us to take over the GOP, then by all means we should do so. This would possibly be an easier and surer way to white victory than building a new party.

But again, it is not possible today.

hey what about cynically going along with it all to gain money power and influence and then secretly feeding same to WN mouthpieces like our host? that's what jews do. works for them. we ought to consider this. plus, if the SHF then we will at least have some people who were connected to the old system who can come out with legitimacy for a new system.

Like I was serious about that part. Just used as an example of how much easier it would be to infiltrate a party with a "hidden' racist agenda.
Puppets all. You don't reach that level of politics without making powerful friends, who will have to be accomodated. Everything you are hearing now is what's known as campaign promises. It's not within their ability, or the scope of their jobs, to carry out the programs and ideas they've been promoting.

hey what about cynically going along with it all to gain money power and influence and then secretly feeding same to WN mouthpieces like our host? that's what jews do. works for them. we ought to consider this. plus, if the SHF then we will at least have some people who were connected to the old system who can come out with legitimacy for a new system.

Playing the games of political deception might be a good tactic during a period of stability when radical and revolutionary change is not even remotely possible.

However, since the system here in the US is now so clearly rotten and living on life support and borrowed time and money, then getting in bed with the people who made it that way might be a bad idea. It would make us look no better than the present bunch of liars who have ruined white America.

I think we will come out much better in the end to take an open and pricipled stand against the multi-racial madness and pro-Zionist agenda that dominates both major parties today.

When the system goes into collapse, the masses will look for a radical alternative -- one that will tell them the truths that they all know deep inside themselves. When that day comes, we don't want our integrity compromised by playing games with the present system politicians.

We're too close to the tipping point to play those games.

That's a vote for George Bush.

Depending on how many people vote for Nader. Disgruntled Bush voters will also be able to vote Nader.
To vote for Kerry is to vote for Bush and vice versa.
That artificial conditions were set in Arizona to keep Nader out of the ballot was a ganging up by both Reps and Dems

The Jews and their allies and the big-money crowd will never allow any such infiltration. David Duke has certainly tried this approach, and look what and where it got him. Even when he won political office and attracted record numbers of white voters, Bush Sr. and other top Repubs denounced him.

Or, just try going to your local Republican meeting and push a pro-white agenda. You will be quickly shown the door and not allowed re-entry.

Indeed; it has been tried by many old political activists in Europe, who have stayed in their parties hoping to change them from within back to what they were, figuring that it's better than taking the long, lonely road of starting a new party. It has always failed, because by the end of the day it's the most anti-White faction in a party that is the most successful, as they are favored by the media. So they grow strong, they succeed, while others fail. And they are the ones who speak openly and brazenly at party meetings, while those who have Incorrect ideas are attacked if they dare open their mouths. Having the media to back you up, being on the Correct side, always gives you the trump card.

That's how both parties and churches have been lost. So the only thing to do is to start with an openly anti-immigrant nationalist party, with the nationalism clearly stated in the party program where it cannot be erased. Then the media will always be against you, so you're sure you'll never have a Correct faction taking over.

To vote for Kerry is to vote for Bush and vice versa.

Horse shit.

Any vote for anyone other than Kerry is a vote for Bush.

Destroy the Republican party.

Horse shit. Any vote for anyone other than Kerry is a vote for Bush......

Let's pretend that voting rights were taken away from everybody except you. In this case, which of the 3 would you vote for, under these circumstances? Not forgetting your vote alone would be the one that would determine the outcome

As I said at Stormfront on the same thread, Peroutka and the Constitution Party are the best thing going. However, I have recently discovered that Peroutka is not yet on my state's ballot, so I may have to vote Libertarian. The Libertarians are still significantly better than the Repocrats or the Dempublicans, so I will throw my support behind them if necessary on election day.

Let's pretend that voting rights were taken away from everybody except you. In this case, which of the 3 would you vote for, under these circumstances? Not forgetting your vote alone would be the one that would determine the outcome

John Kerry.

As I said at Stormfront on the same thread, Peroutka and the Constitution Party are the best thing going. However, I have recently discovered that Peroutka is not yet on my state's ballot, so I may have to vote Libertarian. The Libertarians are still significantly better than the Repocrats or the Dempublicans, so I will throw my support behind them if necessary on election day.

The "best thing going" will not even utter the word "white."

If you want your vote to count, cast it for John Kerry otherwise you are voting for Bush.

As I said at Stormfront on the same thread, Peroutka and the Constitution Party are the best thing going. However, I have recently discovered that Peroutka is not yet on my state's ballot, so I may have to vote Libertarian. The Libertarians are still significantly better than the Repocrats or the Dempublicans, so I will throw my support behind them if necessary on election day.

19 posts? You smell like a Republican especially with that hokey bull's-eye.

You smell like a Republican

Is that why I'm advocating vigorously that everyone abandon the Republicans and vote Peroutka?

especially with that hokey bull's-eye.

They're called cross hairs, take a course in sniping some time.