When can we shed this fed?

Glenn Miller's radio advertisements, paid for by VNN forum members, advertises David Duke's website, and NOT VNN.

This is unacceptable, and tells us exactly how he feels about VNN. Embarrassed, it seems.

In the recent interview on VNN with Glenn, "Rounder" admits he hasn't even talked to Duke in a year.

Alex and VNN go out of their way to promote his paper, interview him, and he chooses to promote a man who wants nothing to do with him instead.

W T F ???

Now he continues to call us kikes and parasites after the moderator specifically tells him not to.

Fantastic forum! AM, you have my respect. I would have kept my opinions of Rounder to myself if he hadn't started in with this "parasite" business. Rounder has been handed his ass. Bout damn time too!
Rounder, you are in danger of sounding like some old coot always complaining about kids walking on your lawn. Perhaps I should just shut up so you can continue...please do. You were saying?

Those who neither distribute nor contribute are blood sucking parasites on those who do. Very simple deduction in logic that conveniently escapes the blood suckers.

Action Alert: Parasite #4.

Theseus: Parasite #5

Glenn Miller's radio advertisements, paid for by VNN forum members, advertises David Duke's website, and NOT VNN.

This is unacceptable, and tells us exactly how he feels about VNN. Embarrassed, it seems.

In the recent interview on VNN with Glenn, "Rounder" admits he hasn't even talked to Duke in a year.

Alex and VNN go out of their way to promote his paper, interview him, and he chooses to promote a man who wants nothing to do with him instead.

W T F ???

Now he continues to call us kikes and parasites after the moderator specifically tells him not to.

This is one of those "trouble makers" Alex warned us about in his above post.

AM !!! Do your duty, and ban his ass. Especially since it's his very first post proving he's a deliberate and premeditated trouble maker, at that.

I just went to Duke's site, Rounder.

I don't see your name mentioned anywhere on his site?
Has he contributed one dime to your newspaper?
Does he allow you to post on his site?
By your criteria, Rounder, Duke is a parasite?
You promote Duke, but not VNN? Why?

This is one of those "trouble makers" Alex warned us about in his above post.

AM !!! Do your duty, and ban his ass. Especially since it's his very first post proving he's a deliberate and premeditated trouble maker, at that.

Federal informant Glenn Miller's latest melt-down is as fascinating as jew-on-jew crime!

/grabs popcorn
//go man go!

Common sense here from Alex. This is a judgement call for all of us, of course people will make that call differently. Think of this forum and Network as an extension of our "street outreach". The activists plant the seed ( VNN weblink ) those who post must be as erudite as possible in their argument, to make the lemming start to think and join us in this fight for White racial survival.

Both complement the other, yet we don't want to go down other forum roads were posters fear the next keystroke for fear of deletion, moderation and banning. Lets just think we are in this big goldfish bowl. People are looking in at us at all times of the day and night on a global nature. Think about the hard work that the street activists have done to bring that person to this board to read your post.

Think before you press that submit button, and that means everybody. Lets conduct ourselves like Aryans, get the message out, and grow this Network.

Very wise commentary, Hawthorne. I don't think the kikes and assorted other subversives on here will comply, though. They'll keep right on using the "F" word in their thread titles which they know will appear on VNNF main page, in order to run guests and new, would-be forum members and activists, away.

You can detect the subversives by the way they're trying to negatively exploit this present controversy ??

Man, they're slithering in here from all over. Behold !!!

Let's make a list.

VNN without the "cussin" is prison food without Mrs. Dash.

I just went to Duke's site, Rounder.

I don't see your name mentioned anywhere on his site?
Has he contributed one dime to your newspaper?
Does he allow you to post on his site?
By your criteria, Rounder, Duke is a parasite?
You promote Duke, but not VNN? Why?

Blood sucking parasite #6. And judging from his above post, he's either a liar or ignoramus, or both to boot.

Gonna be mighty crowded down there is the hoose gow. Hey AM, lock this one in a cell with one of those 300 lbs koons.

I agree that the language needs to be toned down. There was a recent post about McGreevy, absolutely repulsive subject title, something about cum swallowing or something. Also the term "suckpoop", etc.

I feel like I'm going to throw up when I read some of these things. This could do damage to our cause and turn whites away.

4) I really believe that Rounder's mentioning of DavidDuke.com and specifically NOT GOVNN.com in the radio ads is unnaceptable. I think people on VNN who donated money for these ads should get a refund, to be honest. I feel like VNN's been stabbed in the back.

Rounder, stop calling people parasites or kikes that disagree with you. Futhermore, taking part in your newspaper projects is not the exclusive measure of worth on this forum.

will everyone please stop the in-fighting.

now shake hands like men, make up, and move on.

Rounder,

Remember this is the only WN forum that will you allow you to post in it. Without this fourm, there is no WPL newsletter. Maybe Bill White would accept you but that's it. David Duke has already said he wants nothing to do with you but you seem to want to hang on to him.

You should be on your knees thanking Linder for allowing you to stay here. Without Linder, you're nothing. Always remember that.

Rounder,

Remember this is the only WN forum that will you allow you to post in it. Without this fourm, there is no WPL newsletter. Maybe Bill White would accept you but that's it. David Duke has already said he wants nothing to do with you but you seem to want to hang on to him.

You should be on your knees thanking Linder for allowing you to stay here. Without Linder, you're nothing. Always remember that.

Parasite #7, and counting. Never contributed one dime. Never distributed one paper. But he's a prolific talker. Maybe that's his WN strategy - to talk the enemy to death, anonymously from his stool. Who know ?? There've been stranger ones on here. Norcal talked dozens into hiding out quietly for the next century while expecting ZOG to destroy ZOG.

Who's next to fall into Rounder's trap.

Parasite #7, and counting. Never contributed one dime. Never distributed one paper. But he's a prolific talker. Maybe that's his WN strategy - to talk the enemy to death, anonymously from his stool. Who know ?? There've been stranger ones on here. Norcal talked dozens into hiding out quietly for the next century while expecting ZOG to destroy ZOG.

Who's next to fall into Rounder's trap.

Glenn she is more than a parasite, she's (cknott) the host of citizens against "hate" an anti-White website.

It seems Rounder is past the understanding of an internet forum as "a facility on the World Wide Web for holding discussions." Anyone who attempts to do anything but give him money is a parasite. That'd be fine, if the forum were explicitly intended as Rounder's personal telethon. Linder and AM are claiming that AM's approach to moderation is intended to cull useless and disruptive discussions or members to create an activist core for whom the forum is a quick networking tool. It seems to me that Rounder is mostly disruptive, if not oppressive, and barely effectual in getting donations siphoned to Linder in the interest of whatever tricks he has in his bag, or simply keeping VNN online. His own publications are, as most seem to think, pretty bad and not worth donations, nor his attitude.

Linder stated, quite plainly, that the f-word (who would impose this childishness on us?) in titles will not be prohibited. Rounder, melting down, as it were, ignored this in the interest of exercising his rage. Most of what Rounder does on VNNF seems limited to exercising his rage.

AM, genuinely objective, then told him to cool off and restated Linder's opinion. Many others have quoted the latter, which Rounder has continued to ignore. No one is disputing, of course, that "fuck" in titles might turn off future patrons; the problems are: Rounder's rage and, with utter seriousness, who wants comrades who can't take a little swearing?

Which is more important to VNN and the cause, someone who has a long history of working openly for the White race and is presently spearheading a pro-White newspaper distributed in the tens of thousands and running for Congress openly for White folk or anonymous critics? Easy one for me.