How is posting on VNN "the white thing"?

Kevin tells it like it is, unlike Alex Linder ...

WTF? Most white professors are pretty mild-mannered. They have no great interest in controversy for controversy's sake, and one of the last things that would occur to them would be to post on an online forum where, if discovered, they would be villified by the jewsmedia and hounded out of a job. Non-white professors routinely abandon civility in order to advance their own agendas. KM, as can be discerend from his writings, is just too nice of a guy.

Alex Linder has been 'telling it like it is' online since he founded VNN. Indeed, his uncompromisingly blunt statement of (unpleasant--mostly to others) truths is the reason most of us are now here on VNNF.

Maybe he and Alex see it for the litter box that 99% of the time it is.

Of which you contribute about 75% of the litter, with your pointless flame wars with the duck et al. Then there are the tiresome observations that serve no useful purpose and clutter up damn near every thread on the board. Throw in a general lack of anything resembling good sense, mix it up with a do nothing, contribute nothing approach and voila, the Dopp-master.

I suppose it could be chocked up to "small mans syndrome". You know, little guy who can't beat anyone up. Can't get any women, have no job or money to speak of so you spend an inordinate amount of time posting on an internet forum to make up for your lack of self esteem, which you over compensate for by trying to be clever or smart but just winds up being vicious.

The funny part is....you're much like the doc. A little brighter perhaps, but still the same high regard for oneself. The same unduly high opinion of your abilities. The same silly, pitiful posts.

Maybe thats why you hate him so. You see yourself in the doc and are ashamed.

Dr. Steve B, at your service, boy.

KMD does not post here. Maybe he and Alex see it for the litter box that 99% of the time it is.

Hail Joy of Satan! NSM rulez, whooo!

So Kevin and Alex will talk about VNN in a good light, on the what resembles a Radio show, but both won't post on VNN. All you who think its a litter box and mostly about flaming. Why don't you follow Kevin and Alex by not bothering with posting here on VNN.

Kevin tells it like it is, unlike Alex Linder does he do the white thing, and post here on VNN ?

Actually, Kevin Mcdonald only has his own theories, many of which are not valid and are not based in fact ... they are conclusions based on his own theories. And when the theory is wrong, how can the conclusion be valid regardless of how many pages are written?

No, he does not "tell it like it is" because many of his conclusions are fallacious. No doubt, he has done some great research and has presented some great ideas. But he is wrong on many points ... many important points.

It would be wonderful if he was able to debate on this chat board because I could put him on the straight path concerning the filthy kikes.

Actually, Kevin Mcdonald only has his own theories, many of which are not valid and are not based in fact ... they are conclusions based on his own theories. And when the theory is wrong, how can the conclusion be valid regardless of how many pages are written?

No, he does not "tell it like it is" because many of his conclusions are fallacious. No doubt, he has done some great research and has presented some great ideas. But he is wrong on many points ... many important points.

It would be wonderful if he was able to debate on this chat board because I could put him on the straight path concerning the filthy kikes.

About niggers also ?

Actually, Kevin Mcdonald only has his own theories, many of which are not valid and are not based in fact ... they are conclusions based on his own theories. And when the theory is wrong, how can the conclusion be valid regardless of how many pages are written?

No, he does not "tell it like it is" because many of his conclusions are fallacious. No doubt, he has done some great research and has presented some great ideas. But he is wrong on many points ... many important points.

It would be wonderful if he was able to debate on this chat board because I could put him on the straight path concerning the filthy kikes.

Mcdonald sounds pretty much dead on about the jews. What is it he's not getting straight?

Mcdonald sounds pretty much dead on about the jews. What is it he's not getting straight?

He doesn't mention that they have horns, drink the blood of unbaptized babies, turn into bats during the full mooon and consort with The Devil. I guess Kevin serves as their shabbot goy frontman.

The Warlord

Mcdonald sounds pretty much dead on about the jews. What is it he's not getting straight?

Although his research is excellent, he draws a faulty conclusion about the kikes and lets them off easy ... in fact, giving them another alibi for their evil. And what is the alibi? "Oh, they became as they are because of Evolution so they can't help being evil monsters. Since they can't help being the way that they are, they are innocent of their crimes."

Mainly, as a scientist, he concludes that the Jews are like any other kind of Darwinian animal whose lives and life styles are a result of natural selection. They are as they are because of the simplistic natural mechanisms of "survival of the fittest" and Evolution. Thus, his theory is crap.

He has written many large books to support his theory ... but it is a lot of interesting facts that do not support his theory. It is like building a bridge in the desert. Nice bridge, good design, excellent science and archetecture but it doesn't answer the question of how to cross a desert. His books are the same, well researched but they do not accurately discribe the demon Jews.

Actually, Kevin Mcdonald only has his own theories, many of which are not valid and are not based in fact ... they are conclusions based on his own theories. And when the theory is wrong, how can the conclusion be valid regardless of how many pages are written?

No, he does not "tell it like it is" because many of his conclusions are fallacious. No doubt, he has done some great research and has presented some great ideas. But he is wrong on many points ... many important points.

It would be wonderful if he was able to debate on this chat board because I could put him on the straight path concerning the filthy kikes.

What is MacDonald wrong about? Please be specific.

----------------------

Although his research is excellent, he draws a faulty conclusion about the kikes and lets them off easy ... in fact, giving them another alibi for their evil. And what is the alibi? "Oh, they became as they are because of Evolution so they can't help being evil monsters. Since they can't help being the way that they are, they are innocent of their crimes."

Mainly, as a scientist, he concludes that the Jews are like any other kind of Darwinian animal whose lives and life styles are a result of natural selection. They are as they are because of the simplistic natural mechanisms of "survival of the fittest" and Evolution. Thus, his theory is crap.

If Jews are not "as they are" because of nature and evolution, then what causes Jewish behavior?

----------------------

Although his research is excellent, he draws a faulty conclusion about the kikes and lets them off easy ... in fact, giving them another alibi for their evil. And what is the alibi? "Oh, they became as they are because of Evolution so they can't help being evil monsters. Since they can't help being the way that they are, they are innocent of their crimes."

Mainly, as a scientist, he concludes that the Jews are like any other kind of Darwinian animal whose lives and life styles are a result of natural selection. They are as they are because of the simplistic natural mechanisms of "survival of the fittest" and Evolution. Thus, his theory is crap.

He has written many large books to support his theory ... but it is a lot of interesting facts that do not support his theory. It is like building a bridge in the desert. Nice bridge, good design, excellent science and archetecture but it doesn't answer the question of how to cross a desert. His books are the same, well researched but they do not accurately discribe the demon Jews.

I've read bits and pieces of the culture of critique, I have it in a pdf file, it's very tedious to read close print on a monitor so I can't completely refute what you say. However, in his 5 to 7 minutes in ALITS, it doesn't sound to me at all that he gives a jew a pass or alibi. Specifically mentioning their history in russia, and how unfairly they want to destroy any nation in control by whites.

When I get done with the book, I'll let you know what I think.

If Jews are not "as they are" because of nature and evolution, then what causes Jewish behavior?

Science does not postulate anything about spirit, soul, god, religion, metaphysics, etc. So, science cannot understand Man. Science can make assumptions about Man based upon material evidence, but that is as far as it can go. And that is as far as McDonald has gone in his simplistic scientific theories.

What causes Jewish behaviour? Greed, hatred, malice, envy, lust, ignorance, pettiness, evil, etc. In short, all of the things that make up the negative spiritual side of Mankind. And all of the things. science cannot measure, but these things are easily measurable using the finer instruments found within the hearts and minds of Men.

Jesus and Hitler told the Truth about the Jews.

A Nigger in the White House in MP3 audio
"The Sumerian Swindle"
Swindling the Goyim: The Basic Swindle