Documentary On The ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Documentary On The Film - Birth Of A Nation

20 Posts
12 Users
0 Reactions
1,353 Views
ZOG CONTROL
(@zog-control)
Posts: 340
Honorable Member
Topic starter
 

David Duke Interviewed in New Documentary

[INDENT]"A few months ago some documentary filmmakers came to Mandeville to interview me for a film they were doing about perhaps the most important movie ever made, Birth of a Nation...The producers of the show interviewed me on camera for about an hour and one-half. I have no idea how my answers will be edited or how fair this documentary will be... More details can be found at AMC." [/INDENT]

Birth of a Nation (2005)
Fri., Oct. 14 at 10:00 PM / EST
Sun., Oct. 16 at 10:00 AM / EST
Mon., Oct. 17 at 3:30 AM / EST
Fri., Oct. 21 at 8:45 AM / EST


www.WhiteCivilRights.com
www.DavidDuke.com
American3P.org

 
Posted : 14/10/2005 1:54 am
ZOG CONTROL
(@zog-control)
Posts: 340
Honorable Member
Topic starter
 

After reading this rare even handed review I decided to phone up the local Video store, they said they had a copy of Birth Of A Nation (released in 1915), I rented it, it was great!

A while back Bob Whitaker commented about this movie on another forum:

"Thomas Dixon wrote the book that became "Birth of a Nation." He was there as a consultant when the movie was made.

The book was called "The Clansman." It was not "The Klansman" for a reason Southerners understood then. We knew our Scottish roots. He meant that the South was a clan

It is a clan every white man is welcome to join. We more than welcomed the Copperheads. We would be glad to have Yankee Jim.

Remember that the Confederate flag was a St. Andrews Cross, the flag of Scotland. For centuries, when the English invaded Scotland, every Scot knew it within hours. The way they knew it was that on top of every hill and mountain, a fiery cross was lit (1905 painting). Those who saw that fiery cross lit their own fiery cross on the top of the nearest hill or mountain.

The fiery cross had nothing to do with the Christian cross.

When the English invaded the Scots, who were divided into clans, united into a single Scottish Clan to drive them out. There were traitors, just as there were Scalawags -- what a harmless word for such horrible people! -- in the South. But the fiery cross was the symbol that the time had come for a single nation, a single clan:

The Clansman, the white Southerner.

Dixon wrote other books, one of which was "The Leopard's Spots. It comes fromthe biblical quotation, "The Ethopian cannot change his color, nor the leopard his spots."

There is chapter in that book called, "A Speech that Changed History." It is one of the greatest statements of the mission of the white race that was ever written."

Bob Whitaker

A SPEECH THAT MADE HISTORY

"...The courage of the Celt, the nobility of the Norman, the vigour of the Viking, the energy of the Angle, the tenacity of the Saxon, the daring of the Dane, the gallantry of the Gaul, the freedom of the Frank, the earth-hunger of the Roman and the stoicism of the Spartan are all yours by the lineal heritage of blood, from sire and dame through hundreds of generations and through centuries of culture.

"Will you halt now and surrender to a mob of ragged negroes led by white cowards who at the first clash of conflict will hide in sewers?

"I ask you, my people, freemen, North Carolinians, to rise to-day and make good your right to live! The time for platitudes is past. Let us as men face the world and say what we mean.

"This is a white man's government, conceived by white men, and maintained by white men through every year of its history,--and by the God of our Fathers it shall be ruled by white men until the Arch-angel shall call the end of time!

"If this be treason, let them that hear it make the most of it.

"From the eighth day of November we will not submit to Negro dominion another day, another hour, another moment! Back of every ballot is a bayonet, and the red blood of the man who holds it. Let cowards hear, and remember this! Man has never yet voted away his right to a revolution.

"Citizen kings, I call you to the consciousness of your kingship!..."

Exerpt from THE LEOPARD'S SPOTS; Chapter XIII
By Thomas Dixon (1902 Doubleday)

Dr. David Duke also talked about this film at length on the April 11th edition of his radio show Streaming or Download --


www.WhiteCivilRights.com
www.DavidDuke.com
American3P.org

 
Posted : 14/10/2005 1:59 am
Hadding
(@hadding)
Posts: 1184
Noble Member
 

There are two versions of the film, the long version of 1915 and the shorter 1933 edit with an orchestral soundtrack conducted by Louis Gottschalk. Significantly the score featured Wagner prominently. I believe that one purpose of the film in 1915 was to remind Americans of the horrors of the Civil War, as a caution against getting involved in the European War, and that the film may have been revived in 1933 for a similar purpose.

Knowing that the re-edit was released in 1933, you can't help seeing the Ku Klux Klan ride to the rescue to the tune of Flight of the Valkyries without perceiving a resonance to what was going on in Germany at the time. On the other hand, Gottschalk supposedly wrote the score in 1919, which would make that resonance somewhat coincidental, but nonetheless striking. If you regard the rise of the Ku Klux Klan and National-Socialism as somewhat parallel phenomena, vigorous reactions to unjust treatment following a military defeat, then it becomes less of a coincidence.

AMC must have been holding back on showing Birth of a Nation for a long time. I suspect that the purpose of the documentary will be largely to diffuse criticism that AMC might receive for showing the film. I wonder what effect all the attention will have. Most people aren't even aware that such a film was ever made.


[color="Blue"]Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White.
http://www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
http://www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com
http://www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com

 
Posted : 14/10/2005 3:23 am
(@white-winger)
Posts: 1219
Noble Member
 

I doubt they will show the movie itself.It's a show that's been running on AMC,ffor the past month,called "movies that shook the world",a pretentious title,given the other movies they've focused on in previous shows - such as

"Do the right thing"(Of course it did!Remember?I don't!Why?Because it didn't!Just pissing people off and giving it tons of jew media hype is not shaking up the world),

"The Graduate" - Hateful,jew BS that catered to crybaby Baby Boomers,portraying anyone over 30 as stupid and one-dimensional as possible,and making dustin hoffman -one of the most untalented,one-dimensional,tone deaf actors in the history of this country - into a jew media-hyped superstar,and has been forced on us ever since.

"2001:A Space Odyssey"

and "The China Syndrome"

Of every movie listed,they have shown only "The Graduate",so again,don't expect The Great Movie itself to be shown.

And,absolutely do not expect any of Duke's best,accurate statements,to be included.They will find anything they can manipulate to make him look as evil,as We know they see him as.


 
Posted : 14/10/2005 8:43 am
(@abzug-hoffman)
Posts: 3544
Famed Member
 

I've done years of research on the cross and I do not believe there is any evidence for burning of crosses on hilltops in Scotland or anywhere else.

Signal fires, beacon fires and festival bonfires, yes. I suspect the fires originally had to do with the calendar, as high priests in Middle Eastern cults signalled the official sighting of the new moon by kindling fires on hilltops, and Scotland was a far outpost of the same agricultural society that had spread from the Middle East.

But burning crosses, no. Hell, no!


"Go, Nazis, Go!"

 
Posted : 14/10/2005 9:22 am
JoeSixPack
(@joesixpack)
Posts: 1198
Noble Member
 

Download "Birth Of A Nation" (torrent)
Here: http://thepiratebay.org/details.php?id=3395872


"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
-US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.

 
Posted : 14/10/2005 6:49 pm
John in Woodbridge
(@john-in-woodbridge)
Posts: 3725
Illustrious Member
 

On right now. Looks very interesting. I'll need to record the whole thing next time it's on.


It’s time to stop being Americans. It’s time to start being White Men again. - Gregory Hood

 
Posted : 14/10/2005 7:19 pm
odin
 odin
(@odin_1756672026)
Posts: 1565
Noble Member
 

Jebus! Duke was the ONLY White person interviewed for this crappy documentary (I don't count fat ass Roger Ebert, he gave up being White when he married a negress). Let's see...there was spike lee, debbie allen, dj spooky (ha), 3 other niggers whose names I don't recall and a couple of jews (michael medved and someone else). Even the narration was done by jew jeff goldblum. Oh, there was one White looking theater owner telling how his life was threatened if he showed the film.

Most of the half hour was devoted to the noble negro's valiant fight against racism. My favorite part, which truly demonstrates the chutzpah of niggers and their jew handlers: One of the niggers described how the naacp started race riots around the film's showing, and then sued to have the film banned because it spawned violence.

At least Duke wasn't portrayed as a boob. His 10 seconds of air time was him describing how the Klan in the 20's was a powerful political force.


 
Posted : 14/10/2005 7:57 pm
John in Woodbridge
(@john-in-woodbridge)
Posts: 3725
Illustrious Member
 

Robert Ebert is a jew. Duke was only allowed about one sentence, from what I saw.


It’s time to stop being Americans. It’s time to start being White Men again. - Gregory Hood

 
Posted : 14/10/2005 8:13 pm
(@ron-doggett)
Posts: 508
Honorable Member
 

Robert Ebert is a jew. Duke was only allowed about one sentence, from what I saw.

You saw right, some Documentary, more like typical anti-White propaganda. Just one more example of Jewish control in the media as if we needed one.


 
Posted : 14/10/2005 8:22 pm
odin
 odin
(@odin_1756672026)
Posts: 1565
Noble Member
 

Robert Ebert is a jew. Duke was only allowed about one sentence, from what I saw.

You sure about Roger Ebert? I don't think he's one of the chosenites. His dead partner Gene Siskel was.


 
Posted : 14/10/2005 8:24 pm
N.B. Forrest
(@n-b-forrest)
Posts: 883
Noble Member
 

I smelled that reeking bag of jewshit, too. One sentence for Duke out of an hour and a half interview: typical. Fucking kikes 'n' coons flappin' their rubbery soup coolers for the rest of the time. How about that one ape who had the chutzpah to say "Griffith died a drunken bum - too bad he wasn't that way before he made that movie...." Bunch of ugly untermenschen daring to spit on a man whose ass they are not worth to wipe....

Griffith came across wonderfully in that old 1930 interview, though: unapologetic; nonchalantly smoking a cig; the epitome of an old-school Southern gent.


"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin

 
Posted : 15/10/2005 4:56 am
(@centerfire)
Posts: 469
Honorable Member
 

You sure about Roger Ebert? I don't think he's one of the chosenites. His dead partner Gene Siskel was.

I think you're right. I've never heard anyone assert that Ebert was Jewish until this thread. I've heard plenty of times about Siskel. Just did a quick Google search "...+jewish", and there was nothing of note on Ebert and plenty on Siskel (first entry was a piece on Siskel in Jewish World Review). So I think you'd have to explain why Ebert is a crypto-Jew while his critic partner was an out-in-the-open Jew the whole time. They gonna spring it on us after Ebert's dead, or keep it in the ol' ark as they are doing for Zappa? ;)


"In 1958 I still believed that there was a significant intellectual difference between the American bourgeoisie and the cattle that one sees peering between the slats of large trucks as they contentedly munch hay on their way to the abattoir."

Revilo P. Oliver

 
Posted : 15/10/2005 5:19 am
John in Woodbridge
(@john-in-woodbridge)
Posts: 3725
Illustrious Member
 

You sure about Roger Ebert? I don't think he's one of the chosenites. His dead partner Gene Siskel was.

I might be wrong about that.


It’s time to stop being Americans. It’s time to start being White Men again. - Gregory Hood

 
Posted : 15/10/2005 6:11 am
(@angle)
Posts: 974
Noble Member
 

I've done years of research on the cross and I do not believe there is any evidence for burning of crosses on hilltops in Scotland or anywhere else.

Signal fires, beacon fires and festival bonfires, yes. I suspect the fires originally had to do with the calendar, as high priests in Middle Eastern cults signalled the official sighting of the new moon by kindling fires on hilltops, and Scotland was a far outpost of the same agricultural society that had spread from the Middle East.

But burning crosses, no. Hell, no!

Exactly. The idea that Scotland was divided into clans as soon as one crosses the Tweed river is a joke. Only the Highlands was clan-based. Lowlanders hated the Highlanders, as GM Trevelyan and Lord MacAulay make plain. That's what Rob Roy's about - civilised Lowlanders screwing the savage Highlanders.


Hate Hurts - Wogs Kill

'At the end of his life he organized a financial offering for the poor in Jerusalem [Jew city] from the gentile churches he had founded.' - St. Paul [Jew], Oxford Companion to Class. Civ.

 
Posted : 15/10/2005 9:14 am
Page 1 / 2
Share: