Poor Einstein, he was waiting in vain for an Aryan to invent a theory of everything that he could steal, just as he had done previously with his other "discoveries".

Thanks Doc for that. Another one of "The Tribe" who is held up as the light of the Jewish 'science' of psychoanalysis is that sick fuck Sigmund (Fraud) Freud.

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) is considered the father of psychoanalysis, which may be the granddaddy of all pseudoscientific psychotherapies, second only to Scientology as the champion purveyor of false and misleading claims about the mind, mental health, and mental illness. For example, in psychoanalysis schizophrenia and depression are not brain disorders, but narcissistic disorders. Autism and other brain disorders are not brain problems but mothering problems. These illnesses do not require pharmacological or behavioral treatment. They require only "talk" therapy. Similar positions are taken for anorexia nervosa and Tourette's syndrome. (Hines 1990: 136) What is the scientific evidence for the psychoanalytic view of these mental illnesses and their proper treatment? There is none. More here

Poor Einstein, he was waiting in vain for an Aryan to invent a theory of everything that he could steal, just as he had done previously with his other "discoveries".

Or another Aryan wife that will do all his physics work for him . Abuse her and then divorce her , leaving her with a half-kosher mental defect to care for , then move on to marry another kosher cousin .

Special relativity isn't too math intensive, though I think conceptually it's pretty difficult. Heh, I'll teach everyone here most of the math in special relativity right now:

(ct)^2 - x^2 = constant,

and the speed of light is the same in all reference frames. There you go.

Of course, from this a lot of things follow, but that's most of the mathematics involved in an undergrad course...

Assuming Jewstein did come up with his theory, it's still plausible that he wasn't a math whiz.

Einstein, among scientists, is well known as more of a conceptual thinker than a purely mathematical one. As this article points out, he would develop his theoretical ideas and then have Strauss create the math for them. Still there is nothing in that which is shameful. Most physicist are not "math genius'" yet are able to do productive work in collaboration with other scientists who all have different skill sets.

I include myself in that, even though one of my degrees is in mathematics. I suppose you might say the definition of "math genius" is somewhat relative (yeah I know, haha). Personally, I would only call someone on the level of say, Laplace, Gauss or Von Neuman to be a real honest to god "math genius." The rest of us just get along as best as we can.

I remember being shocked one day when one of my math professors ( a highly respected Pure mathematician) was talking to me about the (then) new solution to Fermat's Last Theorem. He explained the basic details to me then said, "it has a lot of stuff that's frankly over my head." What I learned from that was that there are many levels of mathematics and just because you have mastered one level doesn't mean you will have any facility with the others.

So, while physicist are sometimes mistaken for "math genius'" (and some may be), most just use math to do their work, while mathematicians studiously strive to find mathematical theories that have absolutely no practical value.

As Fenrir rightly points out, the basic treatment of Special Relativity is very simple. In fact, it is often presented to undergraduates in the sophmore year after a brief run down of Gallilean Transformations and Lorentizan Relativity. Deriving SR from Maxwell's equations is quite a different story however and is usually only tackled in graduate school or advanced senior level coursework. This goes for GR as well.

Beyond that, I think it is counterproductive for White Progressives to waste time denouncing Einstein. It is true that he has been hyped beyond reality by the jew lobby, however he did do brilliant work even if you ignore all of Relativity (SR and GR). Remember, he recieved his Nobel Prize for his successful explanation of the photo-electric effect. That alone justifies respect. When you add to that his explanation of Brownian motion, which helped prove the existence of atoms for the first time, and his contributions (mostly oppositional) to Quantum Theory, I think he deserves the appellation "genius."

As I said however, I do agree that he has been overhyped. He isn't the Greatest Physicist of All Time as his jew promoters often claim. There are several who I would put ahead of him, including Newton, and Maxwell and several that I would put at least on his level (i.e. Heisenberg, Bohr).

Also, keep in mind, as I alluded to above, that people think in different ways, and sometimes a purely conceptual thinker like Einstein can't really be compared with a purely mathematical minded person like, say, Laplace or Von Neuman. Science, especially these days, really requires different skills and different mentalities because problems often have to be worked from many different angles.

Indeed, one of my pet peeves with modern science is that the educational track most students go through these days tends to reward the reductionist minded, detail oriented math types at the expense of talented conceptual thinkers who tend to be less studious (but that is a rant for another day).

Anyway, the trashing of Einstein, like attempts to rehabilitate Hitler, are counterproductive and only serve to discredit White Progressives. There are more important battles to be fought.

-Brian

As I said however, I do agree that he has been overhyped. He isn't the Greatest Physicist of All Time as his jew promoters often claim. There are several who I would put ahead of him, including Newton, and Maxwell and several that I would put at least on his level (i.e. Heisenberg, Bohr).

-Brian

I agree with your analysis of Einstein's place in the role of the greatest physicists of all time. After 1915, though, he really didn't contribute much to the advancement of physics. In fact, he was an obstacle in many ways. Though he was the belle of the ball at the get-togethers of the leading physicists of the time, he was dismissive of the monumental accomplishments of people like Schroedinger, Bohr, Heisenberg, Born, Pauli, etc.

To give one example, a Brahmin physicist named Chandrasekhar wrote a paper on the existence of black holes which came directly from Einstein's general theory. Einstein then wrote a paper for the Annals of Mathematics which attacked the idea of black holes and said that Chandrasekhar's basic assumptions were flawed. Fellow Jew J. Robert Oppenheimer whereupon wrote a paper supporting Chandrasehar's calculations. That was the last that Einstein wrote on this subject.

My choice for the #4 greatest physicist of all time is Enrico Fermi. He did monumental pioneering work in quantum theory, elementary particle theory, solid state and semi-conductor physics and was the first to produce a sustained nuclear reaction.