The Druids of Europe were the fearless warriors that they were because of their secret knowledge of the HereAfter. That they believed in immortality of the Soul and Reincarnation, gave them the courage to be unconcerned about Death. Only the organized teamwork of Roman armies were able to defeat the fierceness of the Celtic individual warriors.

If you are seeking evidence for immortality, there is no better instrument for doing this than your own Mind. Afterall, the telescopes and microscopes of science are merely tools and crutches for increasing the material perceptive abilities of the Human Mind. But in those realms of the spirit, where such scientific tools cannot reach, then the Mind, itself, is the only tool necessary for perceiving what science cannot perceive.

The Druidic Knowledge that the Celts called the Druidic Breath was a secret that was passsed along with the Aryan conquest of India and came to be called meditation and pranayama. And in China, this knowledge was passed along by the Aryan prince Boddidharma, and it is called qi gong (pronounced "chee goong") where it became the basis and power source of Shaolin KungFu. The Chinese to this day revere the memory of the round-eyed Boddhidarma whom they call TaMo.

When you can find your own qi (spirit) through the practice of the Druidic Breath (qi gong), then you will be able to see your own spirit as well as the spritual energy of others and be able to peer directly into the Immortal. As someone trained in science, this is a very simple way to verify spiritual truths because the path is clearly laid out.

Scoffers need not fear, the Ancient Path is there for you, too -- if you have the courage to walk it. No belief in anything is required]Most interesting about the Druids. I didn't realize their direct connection with meditation and qi gong. The "Ice Man of the Alps" -- the 5,300 year old frozen intact body of the European found recently -- had, as I recall, needle marks on his skin, evidence of acupuncture for a back problem. This is the first evidence of acupuncture being used. In other words, as with everything else, it was most likely Aryans, not Chinese, who developed acupuncture -- and then gave it, along with civilization, buddhism, and martial arts, to the Chinese -- not the other way around.

And we are the ones the jews want to kill off! Those fucking bastards. (Excuse my hebrew.)

 

No offense please, but your post reminds me of Point Counterpoint by Huxley, where one of the lead characters, a leading biologist of his age (in fact the very father of Biology, the character being modelled on Huxley's father), receives a phone by a paraplegic fellow lord who tells him impatiently "after rigurous research, he found the proof for God's existence".

POOR CRIPPLE, HE THOUGHT, HE'S BECOMING INCREASINGLY SENILE!

(By the way, I'll take this occasion and point out the obvious that ridiculous bullshit, in general, must not preoccupy our precious Aryan minds! I would thus argue the composition of arthropods' exoskeleton deserves recycling the irresponsibly spent cellulose on all Bibles and kindred esoteric garbage that even my Aryan children won't believe.)

Yes. Agreed. We should not waste our precious time debating/discussing/thinking-about ridiculous bullshit.

And I'm not.

You have some interesting insights and opinions here, Chain, and then you end with perhaps the most fundamental possible objection to the subject of this thread, which I'll reword in a somewhat more direct way: In a time of war, with everything at stake, to discuss anything other than how we will achieve victory and how we will arouse our troops is an irrelevance and a distraction.

But let's take your points in the order you make them:

Religion which posits rejoining that from which you cannot, by definition, be separated from is fantasy. It is essentially ontological gamesmanship.

It's a bit hard to figure out exactly what you are saying here -- it's rather condensed. But I think I understand. Religions say we are immortal souls and that, when we die from this world, we become again immortal souls -- which we already were/are -- so why make a religion about it? Doing so is just ontological (adjectival form of the study of existence, of being) game-playing -- playing intellectual, purposeless, unuseful, impractical games.

All right. Let's take a step back though. What is a religion? It's a way of explaining the inexplicable through myth. Because the myth is, by definition, fantasy, it is not itself a description of reality -- but a way of telling a story about what is indescribable because it is not understood. Then the religion, because it cannot prove the truth of the reality it pretends to describe, asks/requires the adherents of that religion to believe its pretend description/interpretation of reality on faith, rather than reasoning and evidence (science). Some versions of the religion require its adherents to literally believe the myth, the story, the fantasy too. In so doing, religion misleads the masses as to what reality is. This means that people begin to base their world-view and daily decisions on fantasy, rather than hard truth. This, of course, can be not only a disastrous waste of a precious human lifetime and resources, but it can physically destroy the people's societies and genetics -- through pointless wars of one phony belief system versus another. As we know, probably half of White genetics has been lost in this way over the millenia.

Fortunately, for humankind, White Science has steadily pushed back the inexplicable to the point where there's not much left in explaining this physical universe for religion to have to explain. But that doesn't necessarily stop religion from insisting on its fantasy explanations for reality. We've devoted a couple of threads recently on confronting that religious enterprise by trying to show that religious creationism is a false and fantastic explanation for how life formed on earth -- and that science has well established the truth on this subject: evolution.

Notice the difference in this thread between what religion attempts and purports to do -- and what I have been trying to do. Whereas religion tries to get its adherents to believe in an afterlife based on myth and faith in that myth, I have been attempting to explore the possibility of an afterlife (another non-physical realm of reality) on the basis of reasoning and evidence (science). In other words, I am exploring reality here, not myth, not fantasy. I am saying that I have gradually concluded over my lifetime, based on evidence and reasoning, that there is, indeed, a realm of reality beyond the physical. True, this is the same general conclusion the religions posit -- but their belief was based on sheer will to believe, mine on logic and evidence, as I've said. Since, in my case, I don't need to keep reinforcing a groundless belief, I don't need to make a religion of my belief. My belief is like the belief that the earth is a ball. Once the evidence is established and understood, not much further thought on the subject is required. It's simply a truth that is there in the background of your life, one you can REALISTICALLY base decisions upon.

Yes, we will expire. Therein lies the pain-- having to come face to face with the inevitability of our passing out of this sensual realm.

I believe the evidence shows that the reality of our situation is that WE DON'T EXPIRE. We do, however, pass out of this sensual realm, yes. That is both sad and a relief, particularly depending on whether we die prematurely or maturely -- before we have fulfilled what we want to fulfill, or afterwards -- which conditions are not necessarily contingent upon long life. It also depends on how we die from this world -- following the Right Path (as our Aryan forefathers would say), following the Wrong Path, or in a condition of pathlessness. Our state of mind at time of death is also influenced by whether or not we believe that we will "expire." If we believe we don't, dying is, at least, easier -- because it becomes passing on to the next stage of LIFE. I know this is true because I discussed this subject with my mother in the last few days of her life. She had an absolute certainty of an afterlife, based primarily on her religious belief. But that assurance removed for her -- fear of death. Instead, she felt primarily curiosity and anticipation.

Again, my belief systems have been based, as much as possible, upon evidence, rather than blind faith -- including the point I have just made: that belief (no matter how founded) that we do NOT die, eases the process of death. I saw with my own eyes and mind the truth of this. It's, of course, logical that this would be so, but it still remains a hypothetical assumption until its truth is actually seen

Then, is the reality of a non-physical realm and some kind of personal immortality not a valuable thing for our people, facing death as we are (on a number of levels), to know?

But while we are here, we are consciously part and parcel of the realm. If we were inculcated with the necessary "shooting realities" of our situation instead of playtime ontological fantasies, we'd be enjoying much better and healthier existences as Whites. Yes, Jeebo love you][🙂 [color="Red"]] The only "promised fantasy" I want to see is violent White Nationalist literature all over the place.

First, I'm not talking "Jeeboo" here. I'm not talking Biblical myth. I'm talking reality. You may say I haven't proven my case or, at least, not to your satisfaction. But I'm still talking reality -- not fantasy or games.

Second, we White Nationalists are not yet at the point where we are ready to take on ZOG militarily. I wish we were. But we're not. Perhaps we never will be. I don't know. Therefore, which is more fantasy and game-playing -- talking violent take-down of ZOG or talking about the true nature of reality itself?

The truth -- reality -- is always worth taking the time to explore and understand, even if at the moment we haven't found a practical use for that knowledge. Reality, if you base your life on it, has a way of helping you most when you most need it -- in ways you wouldn't have thought of -- had you not taken the time to determine it in the first place.

Because this response to Chain turned out to be a fairly pivotal explanation of my views on an incorporeal realm, I'm putting this post in a more visible position.

-------------------------------------

You have some interesting insights and opinions here, Chain, and then you end with perhaps the most fundamental possible objection to the subject of this thread, which I'll reword in a somewhat more direct way: In a time of war, with everything at stake, to discuss anything other than how we will achieve victory and how we will arouse our troops is an irrelevance and a distraction.

But let's take your points in the order you make them:

Originally Posted by Chain
Religion which posits rejoining that from which you cannot, by definition, be separated from is fantasy. It is essentially ontological gamesmanship.

It's a bit hard to figure out exactly what you are saying here -- it's rather condensed. But I think I understand. Religions say we are immortal souls and that, when we die from this world, we become again immortal souls -- which we already were/are -- so why make a religion about it? Doing so is just ontological (adjectival form of the study of existence, of being) game-playing -- playing intellectual, purposeless, unuseful, impractical games.

All right. Let's take a step back though. What is a religion? It's a way of explaining the inexplicable through myth. Because the myth is, by definition, fantasy, it is not itself a description of reality -- but a way of telling a story about what is indescribable because it is not understood. Then the religion, because it cannot prove the truth of the reality it pretends to describe, asks/requires the adherents of that religion to believe its pretend description/interpretation of reality on faith, rather than reasoning and evidence (science). Some versions of the religion require its adherents to literally believe the myth, the story, the fantasy too. In so doing, religion misleads the masses as to what reality is. This means that people begin to base their world-view and daily decisions on fantasy, rather than hard truth. This, of course, can be not only a disastrous waste of a precious human lifetime and resources, but it can physically destroy the people's societies and genetics -- through pointless wars of one phony belief system versus another. As we know, probably half of White genetics has been lost in this way over the millenia.

Fortunately, for humankind, White Science has steadily pushed back the inexplicable to the point where there's not much left in explaining this physical universe for religion to have to explain. But that doesn't necessarily stop religion from insisting on its fantasy explanations for reality. We've devoted a couple of threads recently on confronting that religious enterprise by trying to show that religious creationism is a false and fantastic explanation for how life formed on earth -- and that science has well established the truth on this subject: evolution.

Notice the difference in this thread between what religion attempts and purports to do -- and what I have been trying to do. Whereas religion tries to get its adherents to believe in an afterlife based on myth and faith in that myth, I have been attempting to explore the possibility of an afterlife (another non-physical realm of reality) on the basis of reasoning and evidence (science). In other words, I am exploring reality here, not myth, not fantasy. I am saying that I have gradually concluded over my lifetime, based on evidence and reasoning, that there is, indeed, a realm of reality beyond the physical. True, this is the same general conclusion the religions posit -- but their belief was based on sheer will to believe, mine on logic and evidence, as I've said. Since, in my case, I don't need to keep reinforcing a groundless belief, I don't need to make a religion of my belief. My belief is like the belief that the earth is a ball. Once the evidence is established and understood, not much further thought on the subject is required. It's simply a truth that is there in the background of your life, one you can REALISTICALLY base decisions upon.

Yes, we will expire. Therein lies the pain-- having to come face to face with the inevitability of our passing out of this sensual realm.

I believe the evidence shows that the reality of our situation is that WE DON'T EXPIRE. We do, however, pass out of this sensual realm, yes. That is both sad and a relief, particularly depending on whether we die prematurely or maturely -- before we have fulfilled what we want to fulfill, or afterwards -- which conditions are not necessarily contingent upon long life. It also depends on how we die from this world -- following the Right Path (as our Aryan forefathers would say), following the Wrong Path, or in a condition of pathlessness. Our state of mind at time of death is also influenced by whether or not we believe that we will "expire." If we believe we don't, dying is, at least, easier -- because it becomes passing on to the next stage of LIFE. I know this is true because I discussed this subject with my mother in the last few days of her life. She had an absolute certainty of an afterlife, based primarily on her religious belief. But that assurance removed for her -- fear of death. Instead, she felt primarily curiosity and anticipation.

Again, my belief systems have been based, as much as possible, upon evidence, rather than blind faith -- including the point I have just made: that belief (no matter how founded) that we do NOT die, eases the process of death. I saw with my own eyes and mind the truth of this. It's, of course, logical that this would be so, but it still remains a hypothetical assumption until its truth is actually seen.

Then, is the reality of a non-physical realm and some kind of personal immortality not a valuable thing for our people, facing death as we are (on a number of levels), to know?

But while we are here, we are consciously part and parcel of the realm. If we were inculcated with the necessary "shooting realities" of our situation instead of playtime ontological fantasies, we'd be enjoying much better and healthier existences as Whites. Yes, Jeebo love you; the bibliography be tellin' you so.[color="red"][🙂 [color="Red"]] The only "promised fantasy" I want to see is violent White Nationalist literature all over the place.

First, I'm not talking "Jeeboo" here. I'm not talking Biblical myth. I'm talking reality. You may say I haven't proven my case or, at least, not to your satisfaction. But I'm still talking reality -- not fantasy or games.

Second, we White Nationalists are not yet at the point where we are ready to take on ZOG militarily. I wish we were. But we're not. Perhaps we never will be. I don't know. Therefore, which is more fantasy and game-playing -- talking violent take-down of ZOG or talking about the true nature of reality itself?

The truth -- reality -- is always worth taking the time to explore and understand, even if at the moment we haven't found a practical use for that knowledge. Reality, if you base your life on it, has a way of helping you most when you most need it -- in ways you wouldn't have thought of -- had you not taken the time to determine it in the first place.