[color="red"]Now, you may be axing yosef, why do I give a fuck about a bunch of sandniggers fighting ZOG? Well, if you have to axe yosef that, you might as well get back to your niggerball and credit card bills, that is, for you sorry fuckers that even have credit.

U.S. wins a battle, but will it lead to losing War?
6/14/2006 2:30:00 PM GMT

[color="Red"]I thought only Terrorists showed off their kill?! :confused:

By: Kevin Zeese

The death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the alleged Al Qaeda leader in Iraq, last Wednesday, is being hailed as a major victory for the U.S. occupation of Iraq. But the U.S. may have helped Al Qaeda rid itself of a problematic leader and opened the way for new, smarter, more effective insurgent leaders. This may be one of those battles the U.S. wins that ends up helping to lose the war.

Reportedly, Zarqawi was killed when the U.S. military followed his spiritual adviser, Sheik Abdul Rahman, to a house in the rural village of Hib Hib, about 55 miles northwest of Baghdad. The U.S. military then dropped two 500 pound bombs on the house, killing Zarqawi, Rahman and others in the house.

The Washington Post opined in its news report on Zarqawi’s death that: “His killing is the most significant public triumph for the U.S.-led military coalition in Iraq since the 2003 capture of Saddam Hussein, although analysts warned that Zarqawi's death may not stem the tide of insurgency and violence any more than Hussein's capture did.” President Bush said “the ideology of terror has lost one of its most visible and aggressive leaders” and described Zarqawi as “the operational commander of the terrorist movement in Iraq.”

However, President Bush, Prime Minister Blair and the U.S. military acknowledged that this would not be the end of violence in Iraq. They made the mistake of claiming the insurgency in Iraq would weaken after the capture of Saddam Hussein in December 2003, but instead violence steadily escalated.

The death of Zarqawi reminds me of the death of Colombian cocaine kingpin Pablo Escobar. Escobar was the face of the Colombian cocaine trade before his death in December 1993 – just as Zarqawi was the face of Al Qaeda in Iraq. He led the Medellín Cartel which controlled 80 percent of the world's cocaine market – making up to an estimated $25 billion annually. He became so wealthy in the drug trade that in 1989 Forbes magazine had listed him as seventh richest man in the world. Just like Zarqawi, Escobar was brutal, ruthless, ambitious and displayed his obscene violence with public flare.

The killing of Escobar did not end the drug trade in Colombia or the world. After Escobar's death, the Medellín Cartel fragmented – creating many small cartels, a more challenging enforcement problem for the U.S. to deal with. The cocaine market soon became dominated by the rival Cali Cartel, which was more businesslike and less flamboyant in its operations. More than 15 years later, Colombia continues to be the major source for cocaine coming into the United States.

The Christian Science Monitor reported in April that Al Zawahri had been demoted, stripped of his political duties. The Monitor cited the Times of London which reported he was stripped of his political duties due to concerns that his actions were hurting the Iraqi insurgency's support in the Arab world noting “his tactics have alienated many Iraqis, even those sympathetic to the insurgency.”

[color="red"]There is Wisdom even in a sandniggers strategic views. Heed.

The Times of London reports, the first hint of Zarqawi falling out of favor with Al Qaeda, came last when a letter from Al Zawahri, Osama bin Laden's second in command was intercepted. The letter criticized Zarqawi for becoming the “Sheikh of the Slaughterers” as the Muslim population who support him “will never find acceptable the scenes of slaughtering hostages.”

As Patrick Cockburn writes:

“. . . paradoxically, among those most pleased by his elimination may be the other insurgent leaders ‘He was an embarrassment to the resistance itself,’ said Ghassan al-Attiyah, an Iraqi commentator. ‘They never liked him taking all the limelight and the Americans exaggerated his role.’”

As Justin Raimondo writes:

“It appears that the Mad Bomber was on the outs with Al Qaeda, too, and not just the Iraq-based rebels. And this prescient piece posted on Strategypage.com the day before he bit the dust just about says it all:
‘Given that Zarqawi has become a loose cannon and that his actions are handicapping Al Qaeda's efforts, it seems reasonable to expect that an accident may befall him at some point in the near future. If handled right it can be made to look like he went out in a blaze of glory fighting American troops or that he was foully murdered.’’

So, let’s add it all up: Al Qaeda gets rid of a person who had been making numerous political mistakes, had been inappropriately speaking for Iraqis, had turned Muslim’s off to the resistance in Iraq because of his brutal tactics and his attacks in Jordan, and had caused Iraqi "insurgents" to be bitter about Al Qaeda. And, they get an opportunity to advance new leadership in Iraq – new leadership that will be more controlled and less mistake-prone. And, this is a victory for the Untied States?
The killing of Zarqawi, demonstrates the quagmire of Iraq. There is always a flipside of failure to the few victories the U.S. can point. This repeatedly proves Iraq is a desert quagmire from which the U.S. is unable to remove itself. The only way out is for the U.S. to face failure and turn Iraq back over to the Iraqis.

Kevin Zeese is Director of Democracy Rising (http://www.DemocracyRising.US) and a candidate for U.S. Senate in Maryland (http://www.ZeeseForSenate.org).

[color="red"]So the lessons White Revolutionaries can take from this is:

1. Don't let your personal vendettas (as in this case, against the Sunnis) get in the way of the bigger goal.

2. The Great Satan is a bumbling fool that knows only violence in order to control. Use this against it.

3. Don't be amateurish like the Order and bang someone upside the head with a hammer to kill him. Do it with intrigue, always with the strategic goal in mind. Look: AQ got rid of a troublemaker and made the Great Satan do it for them. They avoided potentially disasterous infighting. USE THE ENEMIE'S WEIGHT AGAINST IT.

You can learn alot from "Sandniggers".