The Protocols have been repeatedly denounced as a "forgery", but when you look at the depth and power of the ideas contained in them, it makes sense that there are those who would want to prevent them from being examined and discussed. For example, from Protocol 1 - "The Basic Doctrine - Right Lies in Might":

"Political freedom is an idea, not a fact.

It is necessary to know how to apply this idea when there is need of a clever bait to gain the support of the people for one's party, if such a party has undertaken to defeat another already in power.

This task is made easier if the opponent has himself been infected by principles of freedom, or so-called "liberalism", and for the sake of the idea will yield some of his own power.

It is in this that the triumph of our theory appears: the weakened reins of government are immediately grasped by a new hand in compliance with the laws of existence, for the blind force of the people cannot exist without leadership even for a day.

The new authority simply steps into the position of the old, already weakened by liberalism."

Can anyone really dispute the historical prescience of these observations?

For example, look at how the forces of "political correctness" craftily portrayed themselves as harmless and morally superior in order to goad the old White power structure to yield some of it's power.

Then the "liberal"/zionist/pc forces used the opportunity to slip in and institute their own version of the oppression they claimed to suffer under Whites... new forms of oppression and unfairness like "affirmative action" (really sanctioned anti-White discrimination), anti-White admission and hiring preferences, smearing Whites in their media, double standards in "hate crimes" designation and sentencing, and on and on...

The bottom line is, someone has to be in power, and if and or when non-Whites get power (as the Jews already have), they will abuse it, and use it to stick it to Whites as they perceive Whites have stuck it to them in the past.