My friend and I were hiking in the woods and enjoying a lively political discussion when he stated a point of view on foriegn aid to Isreal that I have not considered before. Considering that Isreal is founded on the belief that God promised the Jews that particular part of the earth, then it would be logical to assume that Isreal is a religious state. With that in mind, it would appear that financial aid to Isreal would violate the principle of a seperation of Church and State.

Any opinions on this would be appreciated.

This is another deceitful manuver by the jew boys, they say God promised them that land, so they are entitled to it.
since when has the bible became a legal document. religon is a spiritual belief, and what is written in the bible cannot be substantiated, so it has no legal power or document according to universal law.

My friend and I were hiking in the woods and enjoying a lively political discussion when he stated a point of view on foriegn aid to Isreal that I have not considered before. Considering that Isreal is founded on the belief that God promised the Jews that particular part of the earth, then it would be logical to assume that Isreal is a religious state. With that in mind, it would appear that financial aid to Isreal would violate the principle of a seperation of Church and State.

Any opinions on this would be appreciated.

Well I like the creative approach of your friend. This is an angle I haven't thought of. However I don't think that Israel could be classified as a religious state regardless of biblical myths. Israel is a secular ethnic state. If racial egalitarians were both honest and consistent (as a rare few are) they would withdraw support of israel on these grounds (as a rare few do).

As far as "foreign aid" I think we have the right to be much, much more straightforward on this matter. De jure at least, "foreign aid" is simply blatant theft of American taxpayer money by special interests and should be characterized as such. No need to complexify by bringing in church and state.

My friend and I were hiking in the woods and enjoying a lively political discussion when he stated a point of view on foriegn aid to Isreal that I have not considered before. Considering that Isreal is founded on the belief that God promised the Jews that particular part of the earth, then it would be logical to assume that Isreal is a religious state. With that in mind, it would appear that financial aid to Isreal would violate the principle of a seperation of Church and State.

Any opinions on this would be appreciated.

Notice how Christians-for-Israel like Farah don't even notice the contradiction, while their religion isn't even allowed on the public square.

What the stooges in Washington would tell you is that foreign aid is one part of furthering US interests abroad, which overrides their concern for separation of church and state. The reality, of course, is that they can do whatever they want to, blatant contradictions and all, because......

"......we (jews) are America. We are the indispensable nation. We stand tall. We see further into the future." ~ Madeleine Albright

This is another deceitful manuver by the jew boys, they say God promised them that land, so they are entitled to it.
since when has the bible became a legal document. religon is a spiritual belief, and what is written in the bible cannot be substantiated, so it has no legal power or document according to universal law.

They've done it twice, in fact. When the Babylonian Jewish priests "returned" to Jerusalem thanks to Cyrus, they brought with them the alleged books of what later became the Bible which "proved" that the ancient Israelites were monotheist worshippers of Yahweh (they weren't; they were polytheists, Yahweh being only their war god) and that the locals were "foreigners" imported by the Assyrians and Babylonians, whereas they in fact were natives for the most part. So they were either kicked out by the "returning" Jews or forcibly converted to the new religion of Judaism. So this neat trick of producing religious texts to justify taking other people's land isn't a new trick; the Jews have done it before.

Well I like the creative approach of your friend. This is an angle I haven't thought of. However I don't think that Israel could be classified as a religious state regardless of biblical myths. Israel is a secular ethnic state. If racial egalitarians were both honest and consistent (as a rare few are) they would withdraw support of israel on these grounds (as a rare few do).

As far as "foreign aid" I think we have the right to be much, much more straightforward on this matter. De jure at least, "foreign aid" is simply blatant theft of American taxpayer money by special interests and should be characterized as such. No need to complexify by bringing in church and state.

Interesting how they always manage to have their cake and eat it too....creation of Israel is justified on religious grounds, and yet Israel is supposed to be a secular state....Jews are allowed to "return" based on their ancestry, which is blatant ethnic/racial nationalism, yet the uN is condemned for voting the resolution observing that "Zionism is racism" which it most obviously is.....because, you see, "Jews are not a race".....except when they want to get into Israel....and "Israel is a secular state".....except that it priviledges Judaism above all other religions.

Full of contradictions, itz.

Someone should make a full tally of all that these ungrateful kike shits have cost us Americans since the end of ww2, starting with aid to Israel, the cost of the 1973 oil crisis, the gulf wars and occupation, the Holohoax museum, and so on. On top of that we could add the costs associated with affirmative action, busing, nigger crime statistics, and the problems associated with removing 30-40 million unwanted mexishit invaders and sterilizing an equal number of avoidable halfbreeds, all of which the jews and their mass media had a major role in promoting.

Has any ever attempted to make a comprehensive estimate of damages caused by jews against America? I am sure such an attempt would be quite a monumental task and the final estimate astronomical.

Interesting how they always manage to have their cake and eat it too....creation of Israel is justified on religious grounds, and yet Israel is supposed to be a secular state....Jews are allowed to "return" based on their ancestry, which is blatant ethnic/racial nationalism, yet the uN is condemned for voting the resolution observing that "Zionism is racism" which it most obviously is.....because, you see, "Jews are not a race".....except when they want to get into Israel....and "Israel is a secular state".....except that it priviledges Judaism above all other religions.

Full of contradictions, itz.

No one could ever make up a truly comprehensive bill to present to God's parasites, but some have made a start of it:

http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&hl=en&q=true+costs+of+Israel+to+the+american+taxpayer&btnG=Google+Search