As Carl Schmitt said: the most important thing in politics is to pick one's enemy. Of course, sometimes the enemy decides that he wants to be your enemy and there's nothing you can do about it. He has made that choice, not you.

Geert Wilders has chosen Islam in the Netherlands and Muslim immigration/ Islamification as his enemy.

http://www.geertwilders.nl/

To that purpose he has allied himself with reactionary Zionist Jews like David Horowitz.

http://www.davidhorowitztv.com/other-media/258-geert-wilders

It's seems like a legitimate decision, as the Islamification of the Netherlands is a clear and present danger.

Note that Wilders's pro-Zionism has given him access to mainstream media and Western politicians. Le Pen would never have been invited to speak to the U.S. Congress, Wilders got such an invitation.

I submit that if one wishes to accomplish anything in the West one must get at least a segment of the Jewish community on board: from the repeal of anti-free speech laws to ending mass migration/ racial replacement to affirmative action, etc., etc., etc. The reality of post-war W.W. II West is such that if you address the J.Q. and/ or Revisionism, you'll be politically marginalized -- as well as professionally and personally ruined, fined and/ or imprisoned. This is reality. And you won't accomplish ANYTHING -- besides putting yourself behind bars!

I have personally come to the conclusion that Revisionism is counterproductive and National Socialist/ Third Reich nostalgia a gigantic waste of time. It also serves to scare off normal White people who otherwise would be open to White racialism/ Nationalism. Once you start obsessing about the Jews you become politically irrelevant and sterile. All the Revisionist arguments are out there for those who care to delve into them. They have been around for decades without producing an iota of positive change for our people. On the contrary, they've only served as a pretext for the promulgation of anti-free speech laws in Europe. This is why Mark Weber's point that even if Revisionism became widely accepted it wouldn't alter the current state of affairs. Jews would still have money and power.

So it all boils down to Realpolitik: if one wants to get traction on any issue and actually produce change, one must toe the party line. And The J.Q. is radioactive today. It doesn't matter whether it's right or wrong, it's today's reality.

We must consider our ultimate interests: the ethnic genetic interests of our people. Every other concern comes in second place. It's legitimate to collaborate with anyone (even Jews) who'll help you to safeguard and advance the ethnic genetic interests of your people.

However, it's not all about political opportunism, there's a current in European right-wing circles (Vlaams Belang comes to mind) that genuinely views Islam as an existential threat and sees Israel as being on the front lines.

There's a tradition of Jewish racialism and eugenics, now vastly unknown.

One can make the credible argument that the only National Socialist state in the world today is Israel.

Wartime Collaboration Between Zionists And The German Government

http://www.rense.com/general82/nzzi.htm

According to the Israeli daily newspaper quoted below, before the Nazi Third Reich in Germany plotted to create a Master Race from the European gene pool, Zionists had already established a racial purification program to create the perfect Jewish bloodline.

A shocking new study reveals how key figures in the pre-state Zionist establishment proposed castrating the mentally ill, sterilizing the poor and doing everything possible to ensure reproduction only among the `best of people.'

http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=0503

This is why an alliance in Europe if Islamists is ultimately mistaken. Once you've started collaborating with Muslim migrants to diminish Jewish power (and that cannot be an end in itself), how do you tell them and their families to leave your country? You can't and won't. Only yesterday they were your allies. You're just replacing the domination by one group (Jews) with the domination by another group (Muslims). That cannot be a legitimate goal. In any case, I don't believe that such an alliance will even produce the desired effect of decreasing Jewish power, since Jewish power is so firmly entrenched. I.e., it's a waste of time.

I don't have all the answers, I only have questions. However, the above is a little summary of my recent thoughts and conclusions. One must always try to do what's possible and think of the objective: the ethnic genetic interests of one's people.