How did we end up with ads like this?

We have to wise up and realize what we’re dealing with here.

There is a fancy term sociologists use called an archetype. An archetype is a model of a person or of a behavior. They’re used to teach values.

Hercules was an early Greek archetype. So were Achilles and Ulysses. When a young Greek male learned their stories they were learning prized social values – cunning, strength, virtue, excellence.

King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table were archetypes in the Middle Ages. So was Robin Hood. They taught values of goodness, purity, chivalry and loyalty.

The Protestant Work Ethic helped develop the archetype of the hard working, responsible male in America.

George Washington was an original American archetype embodying virtue, strength, resilience, self-sacrifice and patriotism.

Daniel Boone was an original American archetype. So was Paul Bunyan. These “frontier” archetypes taught young men certain values like honesty, integrity, self-reliance, independence, strength, hard work, and goodness.

Dime store novel cowboy heroes like Wyatt Earp were huge archetypes. So were radio cowboys like Roy Rogers, the Lone Ranger and Marshall Matt Dillon.

During the Depression, a new archetype emerged – the lawman. Dick Tracy and Melvin Purvis helped mold “Junior G-Men” into good future citizens.

Cartoons and comic strips created a new stereotype – the superhero who used his powers altruistically to fight evil.

Early television propagated the archetype of the lawman, cowboy and father. A child watching television in the 1950s and early 60s would have seen Marshal Matt Dillon, Daniel Boone, Davy Crockett and Ward Cleaver all in one week.

But then something happened.

It all ended almost overnight, like the flicking of a switch.

The negative white archetype was born.

It started with portrayals of white males stopping integration. It took a strong white male to stand in the way of the federal government and block blacks from entering an all-white university. But suddenly, these white males were “rednecks” and “racists.”

Then there was the hippie anti-materialist ethos. Suddenly, working hard, raising a family and being faithful to your wife were “square.” There was a new white male archetype evolving.

It continued in the early 1970s with TV shows like “All In The Family” and other spinoffs (Maude, The Jeffersons) produced by jew Norman Lear. Other Lear productions included One Day At A Time and Sanford and Son.

They all portrayed the white male in a negative role and anti-white male archetypes in a positive one.

The violent black revolutionary archetype was born during the 1960s and became acceptable as the heroic black male during the 1970s (Lionel on All In The Family). So was the heroic feminist archetype (Maude) and the heroic Indian archetype (Billy Jack).

But another archetype was emerging – Michael in All In The Family was a liberal, socialist, pro-black, anti-traditional white archetype.

It wasn't just cool to be like Michael - it was cool to slam older white males as racist idiots.

By the end of the 1970s, the heroic white male archetype with roots back to Hercules was dead.

It wasn’t television that killed it. Television could just as easily propagate a positive white male archetype – and it once did.

And it didn’t happen by accident.

It was done on purpose.

But not by the “jew.” The average jew is just a money-grubbing oaf. He will always be a threat - but the "average jew" is not the major threat.

This was something much more sinister.

This was the work of the whiny, intellectual class, Leftist jew, the kind who want socialism and one-world unity. The same ones who led the founding of the NAACP and other black alphabet organizations and who was in the forefront of the hippie movement and identity politics of the 1970s. These jews actively work against white male interests.

Only seven of the original 60 founders of the NAACP were black. The other 53 were white, liberal - and mostly jews. This is the real enemy.

They are responsible for 50 years of crimes against the white race. They are in effect, guilty of 1st Degree Homicide - the murder of the white male archetype.

They're immensely powerful. But, it’s a small group and easily identifiable. They are not unbeatable.

We can and will beat them.

We must, because we cannot teach white boys to be men as long as they’re around, and without its men a society is doomed.

It’s a fight for survival and the choices are clear.