I am talking about you throwing a fit over a joke someone made about a dead Jew and saying that I must be working for Abe Foxman because I found the joke funny and was unwilling to pretend I love Jews.

I also forgot to mention your love for the scumbag soldiers fighting for the Jews. Anyone who supports the troops fighting against everything we are fighting for is certainly not our friend. If they are willing to rape Iraqis with objects dipped in battery acid when the Jews tell them to then they would do the same to you.

In both cases I objected to comments that paint us in a very negative light, and yes, comments like those are greatly appreciated I am sure by organizations like the ADL. Regular people are going to be very turned off by someone expressing delight about dead children(there were others, besides just me who said similar things in that thread) and american soldiers. Can you get this on any level?

Just really well put comrade and also to the gentleman who began this thread. The hard men and women of Hizballah and Hamas as well are certainly to be admired. Not only have they stood up and fought against what is generally considered overwhelming odds but they have also never neglected the well being of their people and strove to make their lives more bearable through a robust social program which has fed, sheltered, clothed, educated, and found employment for uncountable numbers of their people. I once looked down on the arabs and muslims as simply inferior muds, no better than a nigger but in the past years I have developed the utmost respect for them. We have much to both admire about them and even learn from theri example.
Hail their resistance.

14/88

Any success for those who fight Israel is a victory for all freedom loving people on this planet.

It is very easy to tell the real White Nationalists from the frauds when it comes to this subject. Only an idiot or a Jew could possibly be against the brave Arabs who fight for their freedom from Jewish domination just as Whites will have to do someday if we are to survive.

They may not have all the intelligence or the technology but they have courage in surplus and apparently that is what really counts.

"Do you think these people would like and respect you as much as you do them?"

Absolutely not, woman. I'm certain they neither like or respect "Whites" (by which I assume you are reffering only to whites of European extraction) and frankly that is a further sign of their healthy morals. What is it to be respected about a bunch of filthy degenerates and "tolerant" slaves of Jews. While I totally admire some NSs efforts to improve our kind, so far it is imperative to admit we have become a laughing stock, and rightfully so, for the (ever receding) free world. Yes, they dont "hate us because of our freedoms", they hate us with spite and full awareness of what becomes of them when they are to become members of a "progressive" (vomit), "tolerant" (vomit) and "democratic" (vomit) society.

I'm sure you won't understand but freedom makes sense only for those that use it to any extent. Degenerates are by definition NOT FREE, people regressed into the deep recesses of animalistic behavior, incapable of listening to calls for human decency, moderation AND morality. Laws and government regulations, no matter how rightful, make noone free. Freedom must come from inside, from an internal urge for independent actions AND independent thought. Our "rebels" and whores are the antithesis of freedom. They've traded their individuality for a life of vice and base pleasures.

The central and sad issue is that collaboration exceeds Jews' efforts to pacify our kind. It is like people are dutifully waiting in rows towards the slaughterhouse.

"What do you think of the Ahmadinejad?"

I think he genuinely wants the best for Iranian people. He is the only present country leader openly against Jewish interests. Even worse (for Jews), he shines as the first official leader to question Holocaust and show the world how the West works into the interest of Jews.

Remember when JEWS baited Muslim rage with those Muhammad cartoons, all under a "freedom of speech" license. His answer has been identical with ours: produce holocaust cartoons and ask for publishment in the supposedly "free" press. Of course, the fact none of the publications who reissued the cartoons agreed to publish the anti-Jewish ones is, as Ahmadinejad promptly pointed out, proof the Western press is an agency of Jews rather than a tool of democratic information.

I also liked how he asked for a debate on Holocaust. By debate, he meant the Aryan kind of debate: one where BOTH sides are listened and REASON decides which one is true. Of course, Jews and their pitiful henchmen declined this offer, further proof that by evading an honest discussion, they are afraid the mountain of lies will be uncovered.

I have Iranian friends and they are honest, working people, with healthy morals and total determination to fight against Kike-planned invasion. In other words, other people who put most of ours to dire shame.

D.Duke had some success in Heads-will-Rollistan.
The rest of you Westerners(myself included) wouldn't fair so well,I suspect.

European politicians are like dogs wagging their tails and licking their masters' feet to receive a well-deserved bone and tap in the back.

Sorry, my canine friends, for the offensiveness of my comparison with these RAT LICES.

RE: aherne

Great opening post and I will join you in lauding the great Muslim freedom fighters.

For many lemmings it’s a difficult challenge to take that first step toward racial awakening, and then there we go and tell them that Muslims are a heroic people of the finest character. Most of them will blow a gasket and they can’t fathom why we would “support the enemy”. The jew has that knot in their heads tied so tight most of them simply can’t undo it. The ability to understand the truth about the Muslim requires a third degree black-belt in WN, and is not for the novice.

Yes, we can and we should draw inspiration from those Islamic freedom fighters and we should also learn from their mistakes. The jew has chosen an out and out military solution to subdue the Muslim and the jew has chosen a more passive brainwashing solution to subdue our folk, and that difference in strategy is based large in part due to our different religious persuasion, generally speaking.

There is nothing more dangerous then a White man who believes that God is behind his efforts. The jew knows this and that’s why the jew supplanted our God with himself. The Muslim knows this about us all too well. That’s why they justifiably call us the great Satan.

Knowing that the jew has used these devices to keep us under it’s thumb is half the battle.

We need to continue to reach out to the Muslim freedom fighter and let him know that we appreciate his struggle and that we would gladly form a temporary alliance to do what has to be done.

In both cases I objected to comments that paint us in a very negative light, and yes, comments like those are greatly appreciated I am sure by organizations like the ADL. Regular people are going to be very turned off by someone expressing delight about dead children(there were others, besides just me who said similar things in that thread) and american soldiers. Can you get this on any level?

Is that you on the left? Already looking like a skimpily dressed self seller, ya little tramp.

Is that you on the left? Already looking like a skimpily dressed self seller, ya little tramp.

It needs a burka all it's own.
...and a muzzle.

FranzJoseph hit the nail on the head,as always 100% correct. Its the social component of the Hizbollah which is "buying off" the support of the local population. This is what should be admired most about this organization. With the silent/or not so silent approval of the local population the organization has the basis for a successful guerilla war.

As for the original subject of the thread, i'm not so sure if the Israelis didnt got what they wanted... will now gentile soldiers be protecting Israels territory and wellbeing?

The political class in Germany and the rest of Europe would nothing more than to sent soldiers over there but for reasons of inner security, popularity and some foreign issues dont dare go through their plans.

1)Europe is filled with muslims. An interference on the side of Israel would be taken by many as a provocation and might lead to terrorist attacks.

2)Europe's, but especially Germany's population is very peace loving and the anti-war and peace sentiments among the German population are very strong.

3)Europe and again especially France and Germany have trade and financial treaties with the Arabic countries. The fear of loss of profits if they interfere over there goes hand in hand with the fear of a rising unemployment rate. No profits, no work says big business.

These are the three reasons Europe's goverments seem to be reluctant about sending troops over there. Ideologically they are all neo-conservative/ neo-liberal and pro-Israel.

I think your analysis is incorrect. Ideologically, Western Europe is marxist to various extents. It economic policies, such as "sustainable development", a generous welfare system that cripples the economic growth, highest taxation to fund state programs, are all strictly socialist. Society itself is thoroughly polarized, a typical feature of totalitarian countries, where the state and the single ruling ideology (socialism under interpretatio judaica) politicize every aspect of human life. While in America there is some debate between different political sidepoints, guaranteed by its Constitution, in Europe the non-socialist point is completely illegitimate, labeled fascist and treated as such.

Thus all evidence points out to a typical one-party totalitarian system, disguised into a variety of useless labels. Of course, there are "conservatives" and "liberals". Compare them with what they were previous to Jewish social engineering (early 20th century) and you will see no connection. Conservatives today approve immigration, practice "tolerance", support Israel and globalization. Liberals today are a bunch of populist fags, supporting censorship (of offensive, hateful TO JEWS materials), believing in "equal opportunity" programs (the antithesis of what liberalism really means: free market economy, social laissez faire). Neo-nazis are, according to European definition, anyone who shows public discontent over present realities, looking back into past for a better society previous to Jewish involvement. Thus a German living in a small town, who deplores the loss of Christian values and the aimless degeneracy of its younger kins, is a NAZI according to European definition. In fact, he's just a conservative. A French guy who thinks all people as being equal, thus to support race-based "equality" programs would be illogical and actually racist (because it takes as granted niggers' inability to achieve something by themselves), is a NAZI, according to European definition. In fact, he's just a liberal. In Germany, NAZI is even further extended to ANYONE who doesn't conform to the state-sponsored Jew-worshiping and literal observance of semitically-correct views.

What I'm saying is to be a socialist is not a matter of option, as in US, but carries with it an obligation for observance.

2. No, Germans are no more "pacifist" as dead people are calm. Their peace, as a poster noticed, is that of a graveyard. They have given up the struggle for power and freedom and simply TOLERATE everything, just like someone's body tolerates the maggots feeding of its contents.

3. While economic causes are certainly significant, I don't think they play the dominant role into European attitudes of Middle-Eastern crisis. I think Europe is driven by its socialist ideology to decry American imperialism and hegemony. This somewhat extends to Israel, but a large minority cries antisemitism and full involvement.

If Hitler lived today, he'd be allied with the muzzies. There is no doubt about that. Anybody remember WWII - Japan?

aherne,

i dont know what you are talking about. I was referring in my previous post to the social component of the Hizbollah. How you managed to connect it to the supposed "socialism" in Europe goes beyond my understanding.

Anyway because i sense a lot of confusion in your "ideas" i'll answer your post,although to be quite honest with you at first i thought i shouldnt bother.

First of all Europe is not socialist. Its capitalist like almost the rest of the world. The only difference to the USA is that in Europe (depending on which countries you will refer to) there is a more or less welfare system alongside the capitalist brutality. Europe favours/or at least favoured in the past (since this is changing rapidly) a capitalist system with some social components in contrast to the pure, brutal, turbocapitalistic system of the USA.

If Germany for example were socialist than the upper 10 percent of households wouldnt control approximately half of the nation’s wealth, while the bottom 50 percent possess less than 4 percent of the total. This is capitalism.

In Europe as well in the USA there exists the same capitalist system which privatizes the profits but socializes the costs. Which in turn leads to the social inequalities mentioned above. A socialist system would socialize the profits.

The reason Germany has/had a welfare system alongside the finance brutality called capitalism had two reasons: 1.The fear of the communist East 2.The aryan mentality. "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigenunutz" which translates to: "common good goes before private good".

After the fall of communism and the diversifying of our nation capitalism here in Germany as well as in the rest of Europe is in the process of dismanteling and abolishing the welfare system.

Your ideas about the various political forms(liberalism,conservatives,neonazis) are so clouded i dont know what to say. You left me speechless there.

Seriously i mean no offence but you as a non-German telling me what Germans are into and what not doesnt sound credible. When i say that Germans are very peace loving and there exists a very strong and powerful peace movement here i know what i am talking about.

Btw i named the economic issues as a third reason. It goes out of the question that none of these 3 reasons alone would have stopped Germany from sending troops over there, but all three of them combined have the abovementioned positive effect.

My response regarding European marxism is a statement of facts, an answer to your provided "reasons" that take as granted economic motives as the source of European attitudes in the Middle East.

You fit entirely into my picture of marxoid Europeans. Actually, your oppinions of USA prove my point that marxist views are no longer identified as marxist or left-wing in Europe, but as being part of the essence of "normality" and "democracy".

It has become impossible in Europe to have any meaningful political debate. The former strife between socialists, liberals and conservatives is presently devoid of essence. All European parties, including those described as "far-right" in the press, share the same ideology (to various degrees). You may disaggree, but take a look into the doctrines of these parties and even more so into the ACTIONS they pursue.

Can anyone OPPOSE multiculturalism in "democratic" Europe? Can anyone oppose the system that sees the poor as quintessential victims of the rich, entitled to live an idle existence while feeding on welfare funds? Can Germany expell its parasitical immigrant community and build a country FOR Germans? Can Germany claim autonomy of its Zionist colonizers after fifty years of being incessantly vilified and humiliated? No it cannot.

I am of German ancestry, at least as much as you are. The difference between you and me is the Germany I identify with has been MURDERED 60 years ago, while the one you are defending is a an INSULT to the name of Germany. Perhaps, the Jew Morgenthau's plan to exterminate the whole German people after the war would have given this nation an honorable death... I think the best people Germany had to offer died in the war and the lowest vile human scum (the Adenauer kinds) advanced the social ladder as instruments of Jewish humiliation and control.

What are the GOALS of Germans today? These "pacifists" are as intellectually castrated as an insect. Too bad for the handsome/beautiful ARYAN features they sometimes exhibit. This makes me in their company feel no longer a German, but a diehard adversary of what Germans represent TODAY. The very thought of comparing modern Germany with what it was a century ago makes me LITERALLY sick.

RE: aherne

I think the best people Germany had to offer died in the war and the lowest vile human scum (the Adenauer kinds) advanced the social ladder as instruments of Jewish humiliation and control.

Aren't we being a little too harsh here?

Three of my grandparents were born in Germany. They were not involved in the war because they came to America in the 1930s. They did nothing to disgrace the honor of our other relatives who weren’t so fortunate and who died in the conflict. I know for a fact that my father’s mother lost her job here in America as a school teacher because she was German. And I've been told that during the war years the others were discriminated against as well. I’ve also been told believable stories by family members, of German’s who continued to fight-on many years after the war and some others who bravely hid high ranking officers from jewish revenge. Not all modern German’s are the scum that you mention.