Forum
- Home
- Forum
Notifications
Clear all
General Discussion
4
Posts
3
Users
0
Reactions
1,582
Views
Topic starter
Joe Kowalski's Column
Too White, Too Strong
pictured: Corporate giants like Nike give most of their endorsement money to black athletes
(9/5/06) With Oleg Maskaev's knockout victory over Hasim Rahman last month, whites hold all the championship belts in the heavyweight division (we also have all the titles in the light heavyweight and super middleweight classes). Now boxing analysts are tripping all over themselves trying to figure out why Eastern European men dominate the higher weight classes of boxing. None of them has yet to offer the real reason.
Of course, readers of Caste Football have the advantage of knowing a few things that the "experts" don't. We know that white athletes are usually ignored or under appreciated by the media. Blacks are grossly overrated and over hyped by the same media power structure. We know that the experts always describe blacks as having "explosive power," "breakaway speed" and "natural athleticism." You can't hope to stop black athletes — just to contain them.
White athletes, on the other hand, are "hard workers," "team players" and "possession receivers." Announcers can joke (without fear of losing their jobs) about the "slow" white quarterback or the "fat" white offensive lineman. It doesn't matter that even average white QBs like Brad Johnson and Trent Dilfer have Super Bowl rings and career stats comparable to Michael Vick and Donovan McNabb. Vick and McNabb get the commercial endorsements and sell the jerseys kids wear proudly around the mall.
In other words, CF readers know that "black athletic superiority" is manufactured and not real. Rush Limbaugh was tip-toeing around this issue in 2003 when he said that McNabb was an overrated QB who is only praised so lavishly because he is black. What could have been the start of an honest debate about race and sports was censored when ESPN fired Limbaugh with impressive dispatch.
But now that most boxing champions are so embarrassingly white, analysts have to talk about why we dominate a sport that used to be dominated by blacks. Three main reasons are being pushed to explain the success of European fighters.
--------------------------------------
Continued: http://www.castefootball.us/viewarticle.asp?sportID=15&teamID=0&ID=23023
Posted : 18/09/2006 10:03 pm
Most of the world's strongmen are Slavics too.
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him...." ------ John 8:44
Posted : 19/09/2006 3:21 am
Topic starter
Most of the world's strongmen are Slavics too.
True. This is also an excellent article re why American athletics is going down the tube: the jew discrimination in America against the world's best athletes -- White Men.
Posted : 19/09/2006 5:21 pm
Excellent thread. Many astute and true observations have been made. Maybe I can add something:
It's believed that the former Warsaw Pact countries had much more environmental pollution than the West. I recall seeing a medical journal article about East Germany sending kids from the smoky industrial cities, to the beach to summer camp, to get their white blood cell counts back to normal.
Now, however, the pollution in E. Europe is quite a bit better, largely due to help from the West (mainly from Germany, I think) in modernizing industry. On the other hand, look what we have in the U.S.:
1. Fluoridation. Despite mainstream refereed medical journal articles (I've seen these authored even by a government epidemiologist or by Jewish epidemiologists at leading medical schools) in the 1990s linking fluoridated water to hip fracture and infertility, and strong biochemical reasons to suspect it causes cancer and thyroid disease, we still have it and most people are terrified to speak against it. A Jewish scientist once told me he avoided tapwater, a Jewish dentist told me fluoridation didn't really help prevent tooth decay, I've seen Chinese students lining up to buy no-fluoride deionized water at the supermarket, and fluoridation of the public water supply is against national law in the Netherlands, last time I checked. But the U.S. has to have it for some reason. I don't know whether it's for the (apparently slight) infertility and sedative effects, or if it's important to ZOG to have the fluoridation machinery in place in case the dose needs to be upped 10x in a "crisis" to sedate or sterilize us. The government has admitted to "accidents" in which maybe 10x the usual amount of fluoride was put in. Even without the water, we're already fluoridated from the proliferation of fluoride in "conveniences" like ScotchGard and Teflon, from anesthetics and other medications containing fluorine, from industrial fluoride contamination of air and water, etc. Fluoride is to the US what lead was to the Romans.
2. Chemtrails. Do they have them in E. Europe? I don't know what's in chemtrails but I'm sure it's not good.
3. Vaccinations?
4. TV/ computer games and other sedentary ways?
5. Cell phone microwave toxicity (even wearing one on your belt lowers sperm count).
"A teacher isn't filling a bucket, he's lighting a fire."
- Plutarch
Posted : 19/09/2006 5:46 pm