Ignore them, they are worthless.

When the pupil is ready, the teacher will appear.

How do you reach these white lemmings that bend over backwards to declare from the mountaintop that they "arent racist"...racism bad yada yada yada.

I once had a friend that told me he hated racist people. I thought a lot about the response I SHOULD have given him, but didn't at the time.

It's easy to convince someone that they're racist....ask the white person why they haven't moved to the inner city. Certainly the housing is cheaper in the inner city, a $300,000 house in the suburbs can be had for 100K in the city. The gas is cheaper in the city. The person could save money with public transportation in the city. Many stores and things are withing walking distance in the city. You pay less property tax in the city....SO WHY AREN'T THEY LIVING IN THE INNER CITY?

If they say it's because of the crime simply tell them that there are thousands of blacks that live out their entire lives in the inner city...Why should the white person be any different?

Monetarily it makes so much sense to move to the inner city ask them WHY HAVEN"T THEY DONE IT YET.

Then answer the question for them: "Because you prefer white communities to dark ones."

And if they start talking about their black friends or whatever inform them that they are only enjoying diversity within the confines of an all white community and THAT is racist on its face.

There ya go mate.

PS: I'm assuming you're talking about a middle class white person here probably from the suburbs. Most whites actually from the inner city are pretty much racist and it's a survival mechanism, the ones that aren't are wiggers and there is simply no point in talking to them at all.

Racist is just another word.

Like nigger,spic or whatever.

It's used to identify the unidentifiable at present.

A racist is a patriot to some-me.

To others; it's a expression of a label to place someone in a box generally identified as crazy,ignorant or or evil.

With most lemmings you need to basically be an undercover racist.Maybe pretending to be "leaning" to be a liberal.Than you are generally perceived as "safe" by lemmings, and they will or may trust your opinions and statements a bit more.

Learn to use the Jews tactics against him.Clandestine Operations 101

This takes strategy,study,effort and time.It's far more difficult than just shaving your head and getting a swastika tattoo.You want to win the war? or just show up and die?

Warning:Most lemmings aren't worth too much time and effort;they generally "learn" from self experience.

You can reach them by establishing yourself as a polite and civil--i.e., typical--White person. If they should happen to bring it up, calmly declare yourself a racist. Then watch the expression on their faces. It is usually a mixture of shock, respect and envy. There is no need to launch into a debate about it--simply state it in a matter-of-fact tone. I've done this on numerous occasions, and I have yet to receive a sermon on my inherent evilness.

All of us have friends and relatives who consider us to be racists, which is bad, and themselves to be non-racists, which is good. It is difficult to dislodge them from this position given the enormous weight of propaganda that has deluded them over their lifetimes. They sincerely believe that racism is bad and that they are non-racists. But they are in fact racists and here is a way to expose them to that truth.

Offer the following scenario which presents a dilemma to one of your "non-racist" white friends.

He is walking down a street and sees two buildings that are engulfed in flames. There are no other people around and no telephones available to summon help. He is all alone.

He notices that on the top of each building there is a family of four: father, mother, little boy and little girl. One family is white and the other is black. He knows nothing about the qualities of either family. He doesn't know and has no way of discovering if one of the families is better than the other, better meaning law-abiding, intelligent, decent and hard-working or criminal, stupid, shiftless and lazy. (We know what the probabilities are but the friend doesn't.) Thus he has no way to make what he would consider to be a moral judgement about which to save.

And he can only save one family as the flames are licking at the roofs! He sees a ladder on the ground and realizes that he only has time to save one of the families (or at least he must choose which to save first risking the lives of the other).

Then ask him...Which family will he save? Now your friend is trapped. Either choice exposes him to be a racist.

Probably, and hopefully, he will choose to save the white family. Thus, he is a white racist who for no reason apparent to him (the real genetic-cultural reason being un-known to him) has chosen the white race over the black.

Should your white friend choose to save the black family (thinking that he will befuddle you), then he is a black racist who has chosen the black race over the white. Still a racist.

Be prepared for a third option. He may choose to make no choice and let God or Nature or the ingenuity of each of the two families determine whether either or both are to be saved. If he tries this, he is a fool and you might want to consider looking for a new friend.

The same dilemma scenario will work for other non-whites, jews, queers, etc. It will work for any conflict between people in your friend's in-group, whatever the terms defining that in-group, and people in any out-group. The fact of the matter is that your friend is a member of many in-groups which tend to converge in a single conjuction. He is white, non-jewish, heterosexual and so on.

While your freind is not explicitly aware of his membership in this con-joined in-group, he is the end product of thousands of years of genetic-cultural selection. He has no real choice. He must choose his own in-group or else live with being consciously in bad faith with himself. He will experience profound discomfort when confronted with the truth that is revealed to him by his inability to escape from the conundrum entailed by this dilemma scenario.

He will probably become emotional and resist. If he does, don't push him too hard. Tell him to think about it and that you will discuss it again later. If you see immediate awareness in him on the other hand, continue in polite language to present him with more of the truth about in-groups, race, the jewish domination of the White Nations and such topics until you see some emotional resistance. Then as before back off for awhile and let him assimlate what he has learned.

Like a trout on a hook...you've got him. Before you know it, he'll be here on VNNF spreading what he's learned from you. He will be a fully awakened convert to White Nationalism. And you will be a proud Evangelical Minister for our cause. Job well done.

Something occurs to me: The term "racist" implies to a White boy that he started it, that he is the original motive for Black nigritude, and that if he wanted to he could simply stop being to blame and everything would be alright, but he (the White boy) is "racist", so he won't stop causing trouble.

That needs to be examined more closely, so we can better understand the psychology of people, and why most of us (including me) were once under the sway of these 'magic words'.

Fact is, White boys NEVER start the atrocities that Blacks and women commit against them, they do. This is what we must make clear to the White boy: the problem is not in the White boy, but in the nigger (or Hitler Goddess, as the case may be).

I think it was 'Birdman' Bryant who wrote, "Racist" is how a 'liberal' [and that surely includes 99% of those who call themselves "conservative"] calls a White man a nigger.

The more people are averse to the alleged horrors of 'racism' (especially "WHITE racism" naturally!) the less they can be able to actually think for themselves.

So-called "anti" racists are nothing but anti-WHITE racists, whether they know it, as some do, or not. The really clueless ones do not seem to have any idea (or any care) that being "anti-racist" is pro-death. They don't seem to mind suicide a bit, as long as it's not uncomfortable or embarassing, as long as the tv says its all the fashion, better than being "racist".

Racist is just another word.

Like nigger,spic or whatever.

It's used to identify the unidentifiable at present.

A racist is a patriot to some-me.

To others]

Produce good men -- the rest follows.
--William G. Simpson
The Morality of Survival

 

This is what we must make clear to the White boy: the problem is not in the White boy, but in the nigger (or Hitler Goddess, as the case may be).

While I am certain that Hitler Goddess is fully able to defend herself from the likes of people like you, as a gentleman I cannot let this insult pass without comment.

Hitler Goddess is one of the most intelligent, rational, and committed White Nationalists on VNN. If you have good reason to believe that she is not, please present your case here with adequate documentation from HG's writings on VNNF, or else desist from these insults and offer the woman a publc apology.

It's the manly thing to do...if you are able.

all nigger lovers are actually driven by an insane, vicious hatred of poor, lower class whites. It's true. They want to give blacks nice jobs, encourage them to date other people's daughters, out of an inbred crazed seething contempt for racist white trash. These are the white people who send their kids to private schools, so they never have contact with anyone poor their entire lives, in any kind of intimate way or on a day to day basis.

The cause of this is actually quite logical. Since some of them have not been rich their whole lives and at one time were forced to live in the proximity of nasty, poor, lower class whites, the indignant, humiliating moments of their lives involved unresolved conflicts with whites, not blacks or mexicans.

Michael Moore is an excellent example. This obese clown writes in his book, 'stupid white men' and says exactly what I just elucidated. He states exactly what I said in his own words. He hates white people because it was a white guy who sold him a crappy car, it was a white guy that gave him a high interest rate, etc, etc. So now like a dippy faggot with the intellect of a 6 year old girl, he goes on a crusade against white people.

While I am certain that Hitler Goddess is fully able to defend herself from the likes of people like you, as a gentleman I cannot let this insult pass without comment.

Hitler Goddess is one of the most intelligent, rational, and committed White Nationalists on VNN. If you have good reason to believe that she is not, please present your case here with adequate documentation from HG's writings on VNNF, or else desist from these insults and offer the woman a publc apology.

It's the manly thing to do...if you are able.

HG, there is nothing rational, intelligent, and White Nationalist about thinking a White man like John Bobbitt being sexually mutilated and nationally humiliated is funny, an example of anti-White forces making a public display (and a White man a reglious-esque victim) of the base, cowardly cruelty anti-Whitemen show when given any opportunity.
Therefore I cannot support your claims about being a rational and intelligent White Nationalist.
If I ever hear about some non-White man cutting out the vagina of a White woman, and if you ever see me make a joke of it, then you can call me a hypocrit and deny me titles.

Originally Posted by Burrhus
While I am certain that Hitler Goddess is fully able to defend herself from the likes of people like you, as a gentleman I cannot let this insult pass without comment.

Hitler Goddess is one of the most intelligent, rational, and committed White Nationalists on VNN. If you have good reason to believe that she is not, please present your case here with adequate documentation from HG's writings on VNNF, or else desist from these insults and offer the woman a publc apology.

It's the manly thing to do...if you are able.

HG, there is nothing rational, intelligent, and White Nationalist about thinking a White man like John Bobbitt being sexually mutilated and nationally humiliated is funny, an example of anti-White forces making a public display (and a White man a reglious-esque victim) of the base, cowardly cruelty anti-Whitemen show when given any opportunity.
Therefore I cannot support your claims about being a rational and intelligent White Nationalist.
If I ever hear about some non-White man cutting out the vagina of a White woman, and if you ever see me make a joke of it, then you can call me a hypocrit and deny me titles.

Why are you addressing HG when responding to my post?

Where is the documentation of your accusations against HG as requested? Please provide links to HG's VNNF posts demonstrating her alleged anti-white male attitude.

The fact that 99% of women are irrational is irrelevant. Hell, 96% of men are irrational so one is just a little more likely to find a rational man but only slightly so.

We are lucky to have a few of those rare rational women here on VNNF, including HG but also others, and we should treasure them and treat them with with the respect that they deserve both as white women and as rational humans.

If you want to bash a woman, go to Opps and slam away at Katiew if she's still around but I expect better treatment of good, intelligent WN women on VNNF.

Wake up guys.

Here, jerkwad: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=32306&page=4

And that is nothing. I once started an entire thread just asking what WN "women" like HG and Pixi thought of the John Wayne Bobbitt events.

If the average American White woman were the definition of White Nationalism, then I'd say all hail communism.

HG, there is nothing rational, intelligent, and White Nationalist about thinking a White man like John Bobbitt being sexually mutilated and nationally humiliated is funny, an example of anti-White forces making a public display (and a White man a reglious-esque victim) of the base, cowardly cruelty anti-Whitemen show when given any opportunity.

Correct me if I am mistaken, but wasn't Mrs. Bobbitt a spic mix of some kind? If so, why should we, as Whites, care if his race mixing weenie was lopped off by his mestiza wife?

Because women use the fact that his wife was a mud to justify the sexual mutilation of the White man, because of their latent hostilities and resentment towards the White man. This is a particularly American phenomenon, a tumor from the greater cancer that has spread throughout American society.
In my opinion, the only reason many (not all) women associate with WN is because of the danger non-Whites pose to them, and not out of any loyalty to the White man. They are still the 14 year-old mall-shopping skank laughing and spitting at the White man; they just happen to have been exposed to non-White hostility that has led them to White Nationalist politics. It is a totally selfish choice of politics and not done out of some great ethical duty.

I think that women who come to WN out of selfish reasons (and there are a few men who also come to WN out of purely selfish reasons), should be defined separately from WN men and women with an Aryan sense of duty, who act out of ethical compulsion and not because they are looking out for "number one".