From the summer quarter donation thread:

"Until non-clown, non-defective white men can make a living promoting our cause, our attempts at recruiting quality personnel will remain Sisyphean".

I've been thinking about this a lot of late. With a few exceptions adults who are habitually broke are generally losers, and losers make lousy leaders.

The only way a man (or woman) can survive the financial smack-down exerted upon them when publicly voicing unpopular truths about race is either to be filthy rich, or have a revenue stream that is impervious to pressure.

Hypothetical:

Meet John Smith, gentleman farmer. Smith is 33, married with 2.5 children. Decorated combat veteran. Let's say a Bronze Star and a couple of Purple Hearts. 3 tours.

John Smith is intelligent and articulate. He's photogenic and media-savvy. No skeletons lurking. A born leader.

If Smith were to become a full-time public advocate for White Nationalism, should he be entitled to make a living doing so, and if so what do you consider appropriate compensation?

There are millions of men like John Smith in North America, btw.