This is a really vague subject. Can you be more specific? A power takeover? Of what?

I personally don't think the objective is to take over the govt or military but the mass media. The politians will do what we want them to do when we control public opinion when we show how violent non whites are.

If it's not broke don't fix it. The govt is not broken just misguided. We need to control what the public sees... and right now all they see is one side of the middle east... they don't even see what happens in america unless it is Scott Peterson or Kobe Bryant... what a smoke screen.

This is a really vague subject. Can you be more specific? A power takeover? Of what?

I personally don't think the objective is to take over the govt or military but the mass media. The politians will do what we want them to do when we control public opinion when we show how violent non whites are.

If it's not broke don't fix it. The govt is not broken just misguided. We need to control what the public sees... and right now all they see is one side of the middle east... they don't even see what happens in america unless it is Scott Peterson or Kobe Bryant... what a smoke screen.

A power take over will mean mass public executions of internal enemies (race traitors) and the expulsion and/or execution of external enemies. In other wörds, a Stalinist purge without the Stalinist paranoia. That means nearly all existing politicians will be gone and replaced with our own

China and N.Korea must be brought to their knees. China is expansionist and should be removed from Tibet with at least the equivalent of brutality as used during the invasion. Tibet should be set to rule China to do there what they please

I know many will say the obvious: "Nuke Isreal".
Beyond that, I say invade Moslemistan, get their oil and use it to hold China hostage or, better yet, undermine her

Trade with all and get involved with none as the forefathers intentended i.e isolationist Jeffersonian mixed with Aggressive Jacksonian -- the latter to drive the spics and other foriegners out to create more white breeding space (the precedents are on the books).

The Arabs where always perfectly willingly to trade their oil for cheap. Anyhow oil/gas power is a scam.

I know of some guy in eastern Europe who designed a car engine that runs on compressed air.

Neccessity is the mother of invention so instead of being gluttons by stealing oil we would encourage inventors and scientists to improve alternative means.

Like nuclear energy, energy from anti-matter, and from the earths magentic field. The last I thought of myself and I don't know if it is popular among thinkers but it wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't originally my idea and someone has postulated it before me.

The earth's magnetic field is due for a complete reversal in the coming years (a flip flop) -- hence it will slowly weaken more and more up untill the pole shift letting in more of the suns radiation creating little "aurora borealis's" all over parts of the earth including London England.

Anyhow, if the earth's magnetic field when functioning strong enough is powerfull enough to create a field that repels the earth's solar radiation -- so then why can't someone tap into this free source of energy for human consumption ? Vril.

Also, when the earth's magnetic field begins weakens it will create a window of oppurtunity as well to reduce one element of solar energies major drawbacks that keep it from mass adoption through sheer brute force - -although, the variable mantissa will still not be static :

(1) the intermittent and variable manner in which it arrives at the earth's surface.

This window of opportunity before the pole shift would create a time frame for us to develop a new form of energy before the reversal is completed.

++

The earth's magnetic field is due for a complete reversal in the coming years (a flip flop) -- hence it will slowly weaken more and more up untill the pole shift letting in more of the suns radiation creating little "aurora borealis's" all over parts of the earth including London England.

Anyhow, if the earth's magnetic field when functioning strong enough is powerfull enough to create a field that repels the earth's solar radiation -- then why can't someone tap into this free source of energy for human consumption ?

Also, when the earth's magnetic field weakens it will create a window of oppurtunity to reduce one element of solar energies major drawbacks that keeps it from mass adoption through sheer brute force - -although, the variable mantissa will still not be static :

(1) the intermittent and variable manner in which it arrives at the earth's surface

++

Shit here we go with the Arktos stuff again. Calling, Nikola Tesla! Calling, Nazi ufos! Someone just use telepathy to contact the nazis buried under the South pole and see what they are using in the Antarctic redoubt. That's all we'll need to do.

China and N.Korea must be brought to their knees. China is expansionist and should be removed from Tibet with at least the equivalent of brutality as used during the invasion. Tibet should be set to rule China to do there what they please

Disagree. China is and always has been non-expansionist for the most part. Tibet is an exception due to its proximity and its cultural-historical significance, which is tremendous. I do agree Tibet should be self governing but who cares about the rest of Asia outside of Japan. Let China play Asian hegemon as they almost always have anyhow. The big problem with Chinks long term is keeping them from grabbing Siberia through demographic annexation. Russians need to start having babies!

Shit here we go with the Arktos stuff again. Calling, Nikola Tesla! Calling, Nazi ufos! Someone just use telepathy to contact the nazis buried under the South pole and see what they are using in the Antarctic redoubt. That's all we'll need to do.

Haha, sometimes I feel like a Nikola Tesla or Alexander Graham Bell. All I need is an attic in an old house or a huge warehouse with a chair and a bunch of donated computers in like a NASA style rig.

I was tracing my fathers blood type and genetics the other day and found it it was extremely rare and is only found among the Scottish and Scotch-Irish borderlands people .. and is found among the Kerrs and Bells. So the Bells -- well there you have it I might share genes in common with Alexander Graham Bell. Not to mention my new Alsatian German strain and other hybrid influences all viaing for dominance.

That is why so many geniuses exhibit schizophrenia -- hybridization of European genes with only a fifteen percent non full infiltration of a dominant gene on one of the parents locus donations to the DNA makeup -- ecscarbated by B vitamin deficiency. I concur with the late Linus Pauling in the vain of Paracelsus on many issues and I find vitamin B6 tends to keep active gene polymorphic mutations under control with generous helpings of rutin/C.

Funny that you mention it though. I think "vril" that supposedly power UFO's of the third reich used an engine that used the earth's magetic fields.

I honestly wasn't thinking about that when I posted. I'm serious that this is possible.

++

Ah, cool ... my grandmother is ancestors lived right in the area of the Vril society's experiments and supposedly found a UFO in the blackforest.

Much of their (Thule society) work was done in the Black Forest.

Thule Society members were supposedly the first group to attempt the back-engineering of an extraterrestrial spacecraft. "A German writer, John Von Helsing, describes the discovery of a crashed saucer in the Black Forest in 1936 and says that this technology was taken and combined with the information the Vril Society had received through channeling and was made into a further project called the Haunebu.

Grandmothers ancestors where from around Alsace-Strasbourg (Elsass Lothringnen) .. hmm who knows maybe there is something to this "vril" stuff and it's not just the meanderings of occultists nuts.

I'm only interested in hardcore science/physics of the matter though so you know ...

++

Ah, cool ... my grandmother is ancestors lived right in the area of the Vril society's experiments and supposedly found a UFO in the blackforest.

++

Mental illness is indeed heriditary. Perfect example in Ego here.

Mental illness is indeed heriditary. Perfect example in Ego here.

Isaac Newton underwent a period of schizophrenia in which he accused Locke of trying to embroil him with women. Those who are most gifted at abstract thought often find their intellectual prowess matched by emotional inadequacy. Among those philosophers who never married are Newton himself, Descartes, Locke, Spinoza, Leibniz, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Kierkegaard.

So what is exactly your point .. ? That I am superior lifeform -- yeah, I allready gathered that much.

Many people with schizophrenia have been the great creative geniuses of their time. Charles Darwin, Isaac Newton and Mendel are a few thought to have been schizophrenic. It has been theorized that these people have a highly developed consciousness and heightened sensitivity to vibrations or astral energies. Most modern societies have little regard for those sensitive enough to be in contact with more subtle energies or dimensions, particularly if their behaviour is ‘different’. Human worth is usually measured by achievements, wealth and intellect. There are strong societal pressures to conform, support the status quo and not ‘rock the boat’.

If it is true that a person with schizophrenia is able to access an advanced consciousness, is there anything to distinguish them from the truly evolved beings in the yogic traditions? Both are able to experience detachment from their bodies, both can have visions of mandalas and yantras and enter a blissful state. The difference is that the person with schizophrenia can change in a moment to a state of dullness and depression. Their actions are actually reactions and the ability to witness and integrate is not present. A person truly in the disembodied state, or videha mukti, has worked out his karmas and transcended his desires. This is the final state before death and merging with the cosmic consciousness. A person with schizophrenia may indeed have an advanced mind, but also has to cope with much confusion and conflict.

http://www.yogamag.net/archives/1997/5sep97/schizo.shtml

++

Et En Arcadia Lego,

I thought you were leaving.

Et En Arcadia Lego,

I thought you were leaving.

I changed my mind obviously for personal reasons that I won't disclose at this time.

++

I changed my mind obviously for personal reasons that I won't disclose at this time.

++

ANYWAY, about foreign policy: no union for White countries, since that will lead to quarrels and too much bureaucracy and then it will fail in the end. But White countries should help each other by mutual agreements, country-to-country, when help is needed. And free trade should be encouraged between White countries for the most part, I think, and discouraged with non-White countries. (Hey, we produce most of the goods and services on earth anyway.)

What policy should a nationalist United States or nationalist European countries have toward South America and White countries in Africa? Up for grabs, that question.

As for China, it is said they think not in years but in centuries. And they have always protected their own territory. Possibly they got into the Korean war only because they were paranoid about having American troops near their own border, not because they necessarily wanted to aid in the invasion of South Korea. At the end of WWII the Soviet Union invaded northern parts of China and levelled villages there, massacring the villagers. If it is true that the Chinese think in centuries and that they always consider their own territory as almost holy, they will never forget about this, and will always work to take back that land from Russia. (It's not all of Siberia, though)

Anyway, let's remember that China, just like Japan, is dependent on contacts with the West for their economic survival. Otherwise it's back to the Middle Ages for them, pretty much. So they won't be a threat to White countries, as long as we still have modern economies for them to be dependent of.

Heck, a great deal of the investments that are modernizing China come from Taiwan via Hong Kong. Imagine that! Tiny Taiwan propping up China. Behold the difference in success between capitalism and communism. (Of course, Chinese students are told in school that Taiwan is so rich only because they stole all the wealth in China and brought it with them. And that's the reason for China's poverty, too.)