I like the economic standpoint. Very good. The rest is top too.

Nevertheless i have to bring up a subject which again will cause the known chatters to shriek and accuse me of various things... namely the technological progress and how it affects the labor market.

The automatisation process as well as the robotics and the overall technological progress caused the big businness in Germany of the 70's to rationalize away some of their workforce and replace it with modern machines.

Only in a capitalist system can technological progress become something dangerous to and is feared by the working masses. When a machine can replace 3 workers doing the same job in lesser time and producing more products than it will have tremendous consequences on the labor market.

I say we should look it from another perspective. Isnt it wonderful that we manage to replace some of the work with machines, produce more goods and at the same time free some workforce powers? Shouldnt this technological progress be used to benefit society by organizing and distributing the useful remaining work and the increased amount of goods on a more fair basis?

This is what consequently the labor unions in Germany of the 70's tried. Through mass demonstrations and strikes they fought and in the end forced the 38 week hour. Down from officially 40 as it was back then. In some industries even the ultramodern 35 week hour was indroduced (Volkswagen).

With their successful worker's struggles they managed to keep unemployment low even though they never managed to eliminate it totally anymore. Why that? Because the ownership of the means of production of the big businness were still in private hands. As the years passed by though and globalization gradually set in,especially after the fall of the Berlin wall, big businness overcome all the "profit-restrictions" by simply outsourcing. They moved their entire industries with the machines to low-cost places like Eastern Europe and Asia.

From that day on the labor unions fight a losing war and can no longer force the interest of the working masses on the economy. Consequently they lose more and more members, have to take back many of their former accomplishments (the 38 week hour has been replaced by the 40 week hour again in some industries) and give in to many of the demands of the capitalists just to keep the numbers of fired workers being put on the streets as low as possible.

With the National Socialist state owning the big business we can use (and will enforce) the technological progress for the welfare of the entire society. The increased wealth will be distributed more equally and the remaining work will be redivided among the workforce. Today in the capitalist system the technologiocal progress is used to replace the workers with machines, putting them on the streets (and thereby socializing the costs of this rationalization) and icreasing their profits which all go into the hands of a few capitalists.