Free Republic readers eat up the jewishness of oft posted
"The American Thinker":
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1763645/posts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Mount

It was the site of the first (c. 957 BCE, destroyed c. 587 BCE) and second (c. 515 BCE, destroyed in 70 CE) Jewish Temple in Jerusalem and according to Judaism is to be the site of the third and final Temple to be rebuilt with the coming of the Messiah

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=the+first+temple%2Bunder+temple+mount

http://www.americanthinker.com/static/about_us.html

Staff

Editor and publisher [color="red"]Thomas LifsonNews editor
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=lifson%2Bjewish
http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:ANQRpGXeoSwJ:www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004484.html+thomas+lifson%2Bneocon+code+word&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1

The editor of The American Thinker accuses me of anti-Semitism

Thomas Lifson, editor of The American Thinker, who published an article of mine in August, has cut me off because in an article submission to him I used the word “neoconservative,” which, he told me, he considers an anti-Semitic code word.

http://www.theonerepublic.com/archives/Columns/Lifson/LifsonHome.html

He subsequently taught all three fields on the faculty at Harvard, and also [color="Red"]taught economics at Columbia University’s Graduate School of International Affairs. He is a partner in the award-winning winery Sunset Cellars, in Alameda, California.
http://www.sunsetcellars.com/home.html
Mr. Lifson is proprietor of the website American Thinker.

Ed Lasky
Chief political correspondent
Lasky+jewish on google:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=lasky%2Bjewish
U.S.-JEWISH AFFAIRS/POSITIONS IN POLITICS

[color="red"]Why American Jews must vote for Bush
by Ed Lasky
http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:pWYcaYNB0AAJ:www.isranet.org/DataBank/US_Jewish_Affairs_Positions_in_Politics.htm+Ed+Lasky&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4

http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:Y7ptJfyK_HkJ:www.americanthinker.com/2006/09/the_democratic_party_and_the_j.html+Ed+Lasky&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1

September 21, 2006
The Democratic Party and The Jews By Ed Lasky

Grassroots

The rise of the internet as a political force is a widely heralded phenomena. Political blogs have achieved a high level of influence in the Democratic Party—certainly more so than in the Republican Party. They also provide a very visible means to take the tone of the Democratic electorate and for Jews; this should strike a discordant tone. As several pundits have noted, the blogs have become a hot bed for anti—Semitic sentiments.

[color="red"]Richard Baehr

Panelists (from left to right), Maurice Singer, Doni Remba, Menachem Brinker, [color="red"]and Richard Baehr

National security correspondent Douglas Hanson
Medical correspondent Mary L. Davenport, MD
Chief investigative correspondent [color="red"]Clarice Feldman

[color="Red"]Clarice Feldman is an attorney in Washington, DC. and a frequent contributor to American Thinker

http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:4dtzxKutQCAJ:www.americanthinker.com/articles.php%3Farticle_id%3D5907+clarice+feldman&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/01/transplanting_the_heart_of_the.html

I am a believing Jew. I fear the wrath of God more than the wrath of men. I believe this question should be put to a conclave of Rabbis presided over by the Chief Ashkenazi and Sephardic Rabbis of Israel. If they can find such a formulation that would not violate Jewish Law than there is a possibility that the rallying cry for Jihad could become a seed of peace.

[color="Red"]Dan Gordon is the writer as such films as The Hurricane with Denzel Washington, Wyatt Earp with Kevin Costner, Murder in the First with Kevin Bacon and Christian Slater and the author of numerous articles on the Middle East.[color="red"] He served as a captain (Res.) in the IDF in the recent Hezbollah/Israel war.

The heart of the matter is Al-Aqsa and the Mosque of Omar. Al-Aqsa is claimed by Moslem's world wide to be their third holiest site after Mecca and Medina. This is what they mean to "liberate" with fire and blood.

The problem is this is not an issue that can be solved between Israel and the Palestinians. Israel can quite simply never give up the Temple Mount.

I believe that Israel should explore the possibility of proposing to the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia that the Protectors of Mecca and Medina become the Protectors of Al-Aqsa and the Mosque of Omer. In practice what would such a thing look like? Israel would have to find some sort of formula which would not violate Jewish law. I believe that such a formula could be found. The remains of the Temple are believed to be somewhere beneath the surface of the current plaza on the Temple Mount surrounding Al-Aqsa and the Mosque of Omer. As to where that is exactly both archaeologists and theologians hold varying opinions. [color="red"]Indeed there is a Jewish theological prohibition against Jews going up onto the Temple Mount because no one knows where the Holy of Holies might have been and no Jew but the High Priest himself was allowed onto that ground. But let us imagine a formula which would say that from the surface of the tiles inside Al-Aqsa and the Mosque of Omer, to the top of the ceiling inside both buildings, Saudi Arabia would be granted a kind of quasi counselor status. Thus when a Moslem entered Al-Aqsa or the Mosque of Omer he would no longer be from his point of view in "occupied territory." He would be inside quasi Saudi territory and under the protection of no less than the Saudi Royal Family, the Protectors of Mecca and Medina.

I do not claim to know the exact formula and the devil certainly would be in the details. However if such a formula could be found which would not violate Jewish law, but would place the interior space, from the surface of the tiles to the top of the ceiling, under the symbolic protection of let us say a contingent of a dozen or so Royal Saudi Guards (LOL), the single thorniest issue in the Middle East will have been resolved not through blood and fire but negotiation and diplomatic recognition.