Apperently this guy is a libral with a blog http://holocaustnow.blogspot.com/2006/02/david-irving-goes-to-prison.html waking up after what has happened to Mr. Irving. You can post on his blog comments.

David Irving goes to prison
VIENNA, Austria (AP) -- Right-wing British historian David Irving pleaded guilty Monday to denying the Holocaust and was sentenced to three years in prison, even after conceding he wrongly said there were no Nazi gas chambers at the Auschwitz concentration camp.

AP
It goes without saying that this is an utterly reprehensible action, one I might expect to have seen a victorious Nazi Germany commit — a Nazi Germany as portrayed by the Jewish-dominated media at least — rather than the supposedly freedom-loving nations who've come to prosper as a result of Nazi Germany's defeat.

Let's be clear as to what is being said here: There is no evidence that Jews were systematically or deliberately targeted for destruction. There can't be, because if there was, we wouldn't need to throw people in prison for saying otherwise. We would be able to disprove these allegations in open debate. We would be able to do to David Irving what we routinely do to other people who advance unpopular or unsound theories or ideas, advance competing theories and ideas that make more sense or that conform more generally to the facts at hand and let each person decide for themselves which is true and which is nonsense.

Prior to all these arrests of so-called Holocaust deniers, I had no problem with the official version of events in WWII. Now I do. We are obviously being lied to. Moreover, the lie must be a whopper, something of such import that were the truth revealed something of great worth to those in power would be lost as a result. History is written by the victors, we are reminded time and again. So the question now before us is, what lies are present in today's version of events for that time period and whose interests are being served? Why is it so damned important that we be made to see history in exactly this one way and not any other?