DOC, here you got my hopes up, that the christians are starting to get with the program but nope. They not anti Africa they were anti Aparthied, Aparthied was the WHITE RACIST rule of S. Africa that kept the niggers in there place. They are mad at Izzyrael for acting like NAZI'S. They are still not for the white race if they are anti Aparthied. They should go live in S.Africa now post Aparthied and bath in jesus drivelshitty and love for all peoples. Yucky!

Good catch, Dr. A. It seems Sean/Doc is so anxious to say something positive about Christianity in his egotistical posting streak he is taking some liberties with truth. Just like when he promised to leave. Maybe when Jesus returns.

I hate to say it cuz I grew up Presby, but there is hardly a group of WASPs that is more cozy with Jews. Mabye it's the Scottish banking connection, I dont know. Still they make great racists once they split.

A few ex-Presbys, William Luther Pierce, and Alex Curtis. There are a couple ex-Presbys floating around still.

Probably, they're pulling out of Israel because they think it's racist.

Hate to say it, but there it is.

Martin Luther was a well-known enemy of Jews, so the view that Christianity is Jew-loving is certainly false. Furthermore, in American history, there were plenty of Christian churches who supported slavery, and later, segregation.

Martin Luther was a well-known enemy of Jews, so the view that Christianity is Jew-loving is certainly false. Furthermore, in American history, there were plenty of Christian churches who supported slavery, and later, segregation.

That proves that there are racist Christians -- we already knew that. But it does jack in proving that Christianity is racist. It isn't, it's universalist. Sticklickers can start thread after thread saying otherwise, we'll just keep posting the obvious.

What does "turn the other cheek" mean? Does it mean to force niggers to stay away from your town, or does it mean to turn the other cheek when they come?

Btw, this thread should obviously have been in the religion forum. But I suppose some are just too greedy when it comes to those precious viewer ratings that they'll dump everything in main discussion instead.

Probably, they're pulling out of Israel because they think it's racist.

Yep. Just more leftist posturing from the mainstream Church.

Generally speaking, the Church, left or right, is one of the more passionate and severe enemies of White survival.

Fact: Up until the mid 1950’s America was dominated by Christian leaders
Fact: Up until the mid 1950’s America was a highly racists country
Fact: It was around the mid 1950 that Jews/atheists sought to destroy Christian values

Thanks Atheists and Jews give me a pre 1950’s Christian racist society anyway.

Before someone pulls WWII out you still didn’t see race mixing on a worldwide level in 1930’s –1940’s

true Fred Christianity is intended to be universal in that it deals with spiritual ideas or truths that have cross-cultural and cross-racial applicability. But in its prime Christianity did not negate physical reality concerning the differences among nations nor did it explicitly break down national groups.

So "neither Jew nor Greek in Christ" means only that "Christ" represents a spiritual reality that is less differentiated that national identity. The "universality" ideally operates on a different level than national-racial origin and is not subversive of it any more than a recognition of other universal truths should be such as gravity.

Of course they Jews and their lackeys have via ideas and the usual assortment of instrumentalities taken over the organizations which are nominally Christian, and so they collapse the hierarchy of ideas and substitute this coarse social universality in place of spiritual universality.

Some might rightfully say, well, it will always be thus, and not otherwise unless the spiritual idea is one which puts in the place of principal relevance the whole community as opposed to the individual soul, as does not only Christianity but also Islam and Buddhism. I would disagree, but that would be a fair argument. I'm going to consider this, but maybe that is one of the fundamental differentia between a pagan religion and a universalist one: the unit of the pagan is the nation, the unit of the universalist, the individual.

I could argue agains this, I am reading Virgil's Aeneid right now and it seems that the Greeks and Romans very much believed in individual "souls" as is evidence by Aeneas journey into Tartarus.

............following on this idea then, maybe the "individual soul" is in fact a Greco-Roman (Aryan) concept that marks the differentiating factor between Judism and Christianity: Judism is just for jews, hence the Jew nation is the fundamental unit; whereas in Christianity, the fundamental unit is the individual. Just so in Buddhism (which according to Julius Evola had "Aryan origins") as well as Zoroastrianism (which according to Revilo Oliver, is the true "origin of Christianity) or Islam (which Sokolovsky and other theologians regard as a heresy of Christianity).

in other words, if we are trying to return to a folk-centered religion, as opposed to an individual centered one, perhaps that is a deviation Eastwards and not towards Aryan tradition, but away from it.

Perhaps "universal religion" is in fact an Aryan invention, and the Jews have merely injected themselves into its memetic bloodstream as they have other Aryan conceptual innovations.......

Ok if first mentioned people are so horrible why is the NA now reporting on it and thinking it is an important event?

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3407

Jews Enraged at Presbyterians

Presbyterians withdraw investments from Israel,

The Presbyterian Church (USA), under fire from Jewish groups for its funding of messianic Jewish congregations and a move to divest from Israel, is appealing to both faiths to respect whatever "fragility of trust" still exists between them. B'nai B'rith International, in a statement issued Tuesday, said the "hostile and aggressive" votes "shattered 50 years of interfaith dialogue" between Jewish supremacists and Presbyterians. The group said talks must be suspended until church leaders "recant."

In a separate 471-34 vote, delegates said the Israeli Wall -- much larger than the Communists' Berlin Wall -- "ghettoizes the Palestinians and forces them onto what can only be called reservations," the church said. In his statement, Clerk Clifton Kirkpatrick refused to apologize for any of the votes.

Kirkpatrick said the votes on Israel were taken "as part of a larger commitment of the PC(USA) to human rights and social justice all around the world."

Joel Kaplan, president of the international Jewish hate shop, B'nai Brith, demanded an apology for the "absolutely horrifying" statements by the Presbyterians that he said ignored the ongoing guerilla attacks against the hate state of Israel. "I think the Presbyterian Church on this issue totally departed from anything real, rational or fair, and has in a great way debased itself and its reputation," Jew Kaplan said in an interview.

Last week, the Jewish supremacist Anti-Defamation League said "targeting Jews for conversion to Christianity is an insult to the Jewish people."

Jews seek control of Presbyterian Church (USA)
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/149/story_14980_1.html#cont

It is the Jews not the Christians even the lamest of Christians are learning the truth of the Jews.

you read the whole beliefnet article, and it looks to me like the Presbys are already losing their nerve and cracking and groveling before the Jews.

..............here's the rest of the beliefnet article with the crabwisers:

-------------------------------------------------------

The Rev. Jay Rock, the church's interfaith affairs director, acknowledged that relations with Jewish groups have hit near rock-bottom. "Its certainly a very tense point, but I don't think it's going to break the relationship," Rock said. "At least we don't have any intention of doing that on our side."

Rock pointed out, however, that a 1987 statement that discouraged targeting Jews for evangelism because they "are already in a covenantal relationship with God" remains unchanged. Because national-level funding was preserved, more local bodies could still request money for messianic congregations. "But frankly, given the amount of outcry there's been, I don't think very many presbyteries would want to walk into such a hornet's nest," Rock said.

The church's coordinator of Middle East affairs, the Rev. Victor Makari, acknowledged that the three separate votes could be viewed as hostile to Jews, but insisted they were not. "If we must generalize, they might perceive the one action about the particular congregation in Philadelphia and the rumored action on divestment to be a collaborative campaign against the Jews, but that's not the case," Makari said in an interview.

The Rev. Susan Andrews, who ended her term as moderator at the Richmond assembly, said the church needs to "rethink" how it funds evangelism so as not to offend Jews. Andrews' church in Bethesda, Md., shares space with a Jewish congregation. "I do not believe the Presbyterian Church is backing off in any way, shape or form from its historic relationship with American Jews," she said, "and we continue to respect and understand that the Jewish people are already in covenant with God."

convenant my ass, that's called the "Old" Testament, and when they killed off Jesus H Christ that "nullified the deal" and post their dirty deed they are cursed and we are the "new covenant people" and they are wandering reminders of what not to be. That's what people used to think, these Jewsuckophants might as well be hammering nails home themselves.

Dont expect much from their heirs of the jerkoffs that let the kikes back into England.

Fact: Up until the mid 1950&#8217]

Yes, despite the Christianity it was a racist country. Not because of it. Are you saying that without Christianity people are not racist?

 

Are you saying that without Christianity people are not racist?

That is exactly what I am saying.