Hale could have saved himself by simply doing one thing: firing Tony Evola the moment Evola even hinted at murder. That's all he had to do. Fire Tony Evola - and anyone else who ever did the same.

Only, Matt Hale didn't.

Furthermore, one thing is clear beyond doubt (because it's documented on tape): Hale had no problem with WCOTC members committing murder - even multiple murders - just as long as he himself was not implicated. THAT IS AN UNDENIABLE FACT, as attested to by his gleeful delight over Benjamin August Smith's murder spree - all captured on very, very incriminating tape recording.

Agreed, that tape alone should not have aided in sending Matt Hale to prison, but its admission in the court room proved beyond doubt that Hale had no problem with his members murdering other people - as long as he himself couldn't be implicated.

There is no counter-argument to this.

Hale gleefully approved of murder. THAT, along with Tony Evola's persistently egging Hale on to "terminate the rat" and Hale's failure to FIRE TONY EVOLA IMMEDIATELY after the murder plot became known to him was the one-two FBI knock-out punch that sent Hale down to the canvas.

If nothing else, learn from Hale's egregious mistakes. He made many of them.

Where do you get off writing this bullshit about Rev.Hale approving of murder.Sounds like another know-it-all inter-net critc load of shit to me.

Thanks, I will crop it down and print a few to keep about, including the car so I can become very familiar with the face.

ZOG din't give a fuck about MAtt Hale. They merely foun an opportunity to jail someone and did so.

There are more intelligent groups than the fucking WCOTC. Matt Hale merely got picked because he had bad luck and wasn't smart enough to say OH NO at the right time.

I mean, I agree Hale was set up, but they merely convict him because he did not play the game correctly. When someone says I will kill for you, you turn them over to ZOG because that person is a ZOG Agent an you want to play the game both by the rules an beyon rules if you know whawt i'm sayuing loool alcoholl

I'm not trying to rub salt in the wounds, but I have to say for once I have to agree with this excerpt from an SPLC "Intelligence Report":

"After the 10th time he's brought up killing somebody, how could you not be suspicious?" asked Richard Warman, a Canadian human-rights attorney who came to Chicago for the trial. "Hale must have read entrapment cases in first-year law. How could it not occur to him, 'Gee, it's almost like this guy's trying to get me to order a killing'? The first few times, sure, maybe you just think the guy's being overzealous. There are plenty of overzealous neo-Nazis out there. But the ninth, 10th time?

"Even if you're dumber than a bag of hammers, you're not going to keep failing to suspect anything."

In case it wasn't already clear, although it should have been, Hale's fate shows you can't be ambivalant about avoiding violence if you are running an above-ground "legal" org. That's the long and short of it, so let the wise internalize this lesson for once and for all. Case closed.

There have been a number of cases of nigger and spic law school graduates who are known racist-activists for their races, and have zero trouble getting certified to practice law in their states. No moral turpitude question exists for the governing authorities if you are a brown or black racist.

Exactly. Perhaps the most notorius is Angela Davis who spent time in jail and was at one point a fugitive from the law on charges of murder and kidnapping Though she was found innocent of those specific charges later on, she has continued to be an ardent communist and "black actvist." Her own racism and hatred of America was no bar to her getting a professorship at UC Santa Cruz.

http://www.louisville.edu/a-s/lbst/project/davis.html

What this shows is that there is a double standard and selective prosecution of Pro-White activist. While part of it is the ideological environment at the policy level that is deeply antagonistic to us (i.e. jewish control) another part is the fact that our political vulnerablity makes us easy targets for the government. The fact is, governemnt agents loves White Progressives because we make their job so dammed easy.

If you are a fed, and you have a choice of investigating the mafia (which might get you dead), AIPAC (which might get you fired), The New Black Panther Party (which might get you dead and/or fired) OR some sort of Pro-White group (which might get you a promotion and a pat on the back), which would you choose (assuming you had no principles). Beyond that, no one is going to complain if the government engages in illegal activity, or uses trumped up charges to get us.

If you read the transcripts of the Hale/Evola exchage, you come to 2 conclusions:

1: Hale was set up by a crooked and irredeemably wicked group of people.
2: Hale was stupid for allowing it to happen.

Mike said:

In case it wasn't already clear, although it should have been, Hale's fate shows you can't be ambivalant about avoiding violence if you are running an above-ground "legal" org. That's the long and short of it, so let the wise internalize this lesson for once and for all. Case closed.

Absolutely.

I don't know what Matt Hale was thinking, perhaps he thought he was being SOOOOO clever, but you can't play games like this. If you are going to run an organization that is so antagonistic to the jews and their lackies, you'd damm well better not do anything that gives them an excuse to come down on you.

We no longer live in a free country. But we also do not (yet) live in a tryrannical country. We are in a sort of twilight where the government still likes to keep alive the illusion that we are free, sort of like the old USSR which had all the trappings of a free country in their Constitution, but which was in fact a hard core tyranny.

As a result, our government appears to play by the rules and use various legal fig leaves to cover up their wrong doing (i.e. "rendition" of terrorist to foreign countries so that they can be tortured for information). Like Matt Hale, our government likes to have plausible deniability so that when it engages in selective prosecution of White Progressives they will have some superficially plausible excuse.

The evidence against Matt Hale, or Chester Doles for that matter, would not have been enough to send anyone else not of the Pro-white mentality to the slammer. But both of those guys gave the government the motivation to find a fig leave to make a special circumstance.

The lesson out of all this for us is not to sit around bitching about how persecuted we are like a bunch of niggers, but to learn to game the system as best we can.

Also, we should all be aware that EVERY Pro-White group or forum (including VNN) is almost certainly penetrated up the wazoo by informants at the very least if not outright government agents. So watch what you say. Don't give them a hook.

-Brian

Post it immediately on rapidshare.de. The limits are 100MB, I think.

<snip!>
What this shows is that there is a double standard and selective prosecution of Pro-White activist. While part of it is the ideological environment at the policy level that is deeply antagonistic to us (i.e. jewish control) another part is the fact that our political vulnerablity makes us easy targets for the government. The fact is, governemnt agents loves White Progressives because we make their job so dammed easy.

<snip!>
As a result, our government appears to play by the rules and use various legal fig leaves to cover up their wrong doing (i.e. "rendition" of terrorist to foreign countries so that they can be tortured for information). Like Matt Hale, our government likes to have plausible deniability so that when it engages in selective prosecution of White Progressives they will have some superficially plausible excuse.

The evidence against Matt Hale, or Chester Doles for that matter, would not have been enough to send anyone else not of the Pro-white mentality to the slammer. But both of those guys gave the government the motivation to find a fig leave to make a special circumstance.

The lesson out of all this for us is not to sit around bitching about how persecuted we are like a bunch of niggers, but to learn to game the system as best we can.

Also, we should all be aware that EVERY Pro-White group or forum (including VNN) is almost certainly penetrated up the wazoo by informants at the very least if not outright government agents. So watch what you say. Don't give them a hook.
-Brian

the 'evidence' against Hale was TOTAL CRAP: just 'hearsay' AFAI can make out from the transcript.
NO WAY he would hv been convicted in an Oz court of a charge like 'conspiracy to murder' which is what it amounts to AFAI can see!
(not to say he couldn't have been 'set up' on a ZOG 'terrorism' charge where all the 'elements of the charge' are so Talmudic as to mean whatever the kikes want them to mean @ that particular time & place)
BUT for a 'straight up' criminal charge: NO WAY!
wotz the bet 'the jury' were a bunch of FCKN niggas?.......the trial judge was a kike? and the 'prosecution team'(gotta hv 'a team' to convict a WCOTC/WN rather than just a plain ordinary 'prosecutor') were a 'barber-shop' quartet of hymies? same ol' same ol' in the JewSA!
(that 'Evola' character looks like a yoo to me! what the HELL made PM Hale trust the likes of him for?: he looks as shifty as 'a shit-house rat')
all this seems to indicate that, for serious and committed WNs, the time to work 'within the system and within the law' is rapidly drawing to a close.
Even 150yrs ago, no self-respecting White Man would have copped an outrage like this for a JewYorkMinute!

(jimbo!)

What this shows is that there is a double standard and selective prosecution of Pro-White activist. While part of it is the ideological environment at the policy level that is deeply antagonistic to us (i.e. jewish control) another part is the fact that our political vulnerablity makes us easy targets for the government. The fact is, governemnt agents loves White Progressives because we make their job so dammed easy.

If you are a fed, and you have a choice of investigating the mafia (which might get you dead), AIPAC (which might get you fired), The New Black Panther Party (which might get you dead and/or fired) OR some sort of Pro-White group (which might get you a promotion and a pat on the back), which would you choose (assuming you had no principles). Beyond that, no one is going to complain if the government engages in illegal activity, or uses trumped up charges to -Brian

Fine point Brian. I think you can pretty much sum it up this way: if the government views you as a threat in any way, they will find a way to take you down. There are all sorts of strategies they can employ to do this. Yet, the zog is not stupid. They at least learn from their mistakes - Ruby Ridge, Waco...all total PR disasters and lots of people wound up dead.
So perhaps they just infiltrate you and set you up. If they don't find evidence they can just as easily make it up.

Who has the power? who enforces the legal system? pretty basic philosophy here. Yes, zog is corrupt and our country is run by terrorists and anti-Americans in the federal govt...so if you even assume for one second our Constitutional Rights matter or the 'system' is fair, you are mistaken.

If the zog is after you, you have a better chance of survival by getting on a boat and sailing to South America or somewhere.

I have never had any sympathy for Hale. He played a dangerous game and the self-styled lawyer of the movement came down hard.

He suffered from the very worst symptoms of the pro-white movement "leadership": a huge Ego and massive arrogance. Those blinded him to reality. That is what made him an easy target for a childishly easy arrest.

When are American activists going to wake up and realise the rules don't apply to them? Having said that, they spend 90% of their time fighting each other so the state must find it easy to keep white resistance to a minimum........