Mighty interesting, Burrhus. I'd never heard of James Hart. But from the information you provide, I assume he'll be on the ballot in Tennessee for U.S. Congress in the upcoming primary elections, as a Republican. Unlike Missouri, obviously TN has no law allowing parties to deny ballot access to qualified citizens.
Do you have his campaign website, and/or phone number ? I'd like to chat with him.
I picked that story off the Birdman's site.
I found his website on Google.
http://www.jameshartforcongress.com/
The man who believes that he has free will is more easily controlled since he will never think to look for the chains--Burrhus
[color="Red"]The jews are a problem--not our ONLY or SOLE problem, not responsible for EVERY problem faced by gentiles, not some ALL-POWERFUL race that we shouldn't bother trying to resist, not an EXCUSE for avoiding responsibilty for problems of our own making --but nonetheless, A REAL, SERIOUS PROBLEM.--Burrhus
I picked that story off the Birdman's site.
I found his website on Google.
Thanks. His website does not provide a phone number, only a PO box address. I noticed he advertises a Jared Taylor book. And nowhere on his website do I see any mention of the jews.
Frankly, I see little difference between kosher racialists like Jared Taylor and neo-con jews like David Horowitz. I wouldn't waste a minute of my time running on a racialist platform that didn't include exposing the GD kikes as the, by far, largest "plank".
Compared to the jewish problem all other problems are distractions. Our exposures of racial problems to the lemmings are only for the purpose of getting their attention so we can educate them about the jews.
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire
Thanks. His website does not provide a phone number, only a PO box address. I noticed he advertises a Jared Taylor book. And nowhere on his website do I see any mention of the jews.
Frankly, I see little difference between kosher racialists like Jared Taylor and neo-con jews like David Horowitz. I wouldn't waste a minute of my time running on a racialist platform that didn't include exposing the GD kikes as the, by far, largest "plank".
Compared to the jewish problem all other problems are distractions. Our exposures of racial problems to the lemmings are only for the purpose of getting their attention so we can educate them about the jews.
I agree with you that the jew is the major problem.
But like the old share-cropper would whack the mule in the head with a stick to get its attention, you're right that the truth about the extinction of the white race is the best stick to get white people's attention.
As to the data on white extinction, I can't find anything better. But I would be quite confident going with 30% white in 1935 or 70 years ago (use both time designations to emphasize) and 10% today. That's a 67% reduction. 67% sounds big. Ask them how they would feel if 67% of their relatives and friends disappeared.
What I have read about past population data, claims a high of 33% in 1935 and a low of 8% today so the figures above should be safe and sufficiently dramatic. If someone says that you're wrong, ask for their source. They probably wont have one and they will look deceitful. Whatever the real figures are, they're going to be bad enough.
Then hit them with predictions. Whites will be less than 50% of the American population in 2050. Tell them that their children will be their age then. Do they want their children to be a minority group in America? They don't.
The worldwide white population is predicted to be 5% in 2050 and 2% by 2100 when their grandchildren will be their age. 2% Say it again...2%. That's close enough to extinction to not make any difference.
The final questions: Do want your grandchildren to have a white person to marry? Do you want your grandchildren to have no choice but to marry a black?
Don't answer those questions. Let your listeners answer them for themselves. They will. And the answers will be...YES...and NO. They will feel smart for knowing the right answers. The answer will be their own and stay in their heads.
Then, when you've got their attention, ask them: Why do we face that menace? Do you know? Who could it be that has done this to us? Could it be the jews?
Then tell them. Yes, it could be and it is. People don't like un-answered questions and they do like answers. If you can get the extinction problem into their heads and then the questions, the answers will come as if they are their own. They'll think...yea that guy is right, I knew that, the jews are always a problem. They don't want to appear stupid to themselves.
They're yours.
The man who believes that he has free will is more easily controlled since he will never think to look for the chains--Burrhus
[color="Red"]The jews are a problem--not our ONLY or SOLE problem, not responsible for EVERY problem faced by gentiles, not some ALL-POWERFUL race that we shouldn't bother trying to resist, not an EXCUSE for avoiding responsibilty for problems of our own making --but nonetheless, A REAL, SERIOUS PROBLEM.--Burrhus
I agree with you that the jew is the major problem.
But like the old share-cropper would whack the mule in the head with a stick to get its attention, you're right that the truth about the extinction of the white race is the best stick to get white people's attention.
As to the data on white extinction, I can't find anything better. But I would be quite confident going with 30% white in 1935 or 70 years ago (use both time designations to emphasize) and 10% today. That's a 67% reduction. 67% sounds big. Ask them how they would feel if 67% of their relatives and friends disappeared.
What I have read about past population data, claims a high of 33% in 1935 and a low of 8% today so the figures above should be safe and sufficiently dramatic. If someone says that you're wrong, ask for their source. They probably wont have one and they will look deceitful. Whatever the real figures are, they're going to be bad enough.
Then hit them with predictions. Whites will be less than 50% of the American population in 2050. Tell them that their children will be their age then. Do they want their children to be a minority group in America? They don't.
The worldwide white population is predicted to be 5% in 2050 and 2% by 2100 when their grandchildren will be their age. 2% Say it again...2%. That's close enough to extinction to not make any difference.
The final questions: Do want your grandchildren to have a white person to marry? Do you want your grandchildren to have no choice but to marry a black?
Don't answer those questions. Let your listeners answer them for themselves. They will. And the answers will be...YES...and NO. They will feel smart for knowing the right answers. The answer will be their own and stay in their heads.
Then, when you've got their attention, ask them: Why do we face that menace? Do you know? Who could it be that has done this to us? Could it be the jews?
Then tell them. Yes, it could be and it is. People don't like un-answered questions and they do like answers. If you can get the extinction problem into their heads and then the questions, the answers will come as if they are their own. They'll think...yea that guy is right, I knew that, the jews are always a problem. They don't want to appear stupid to themselves.
They're yours.
Excellent recommendations, Burrhus. Thanks.
People can understand simple math. I read recently that the world population increases by 95 million yearly. Since the White birth rate world wide is only 1.25 (according to David Duke, and I believe it), and since 2.1 is required to maintain present population numbers, that not only means that every single one of the increase is non-white, but Whites actually decrease dramatically in total number every day. I figure we lose about 10 million in total number, yearly. In other words, about 10 million more of us die each year, than are born. And Whites buy almost twice as many caskets as cradles.
What's always puzzled me, is why rich and influential Whites don't give a damn. And indeed continue to contribute to the acceleration of our extinction with their words and deeds. I believe their "plan" is simply to marry off their offspring to muds, while satisfying their own bellies, pocket books, and genitals, and living high on the hog, for the remainder of their own lives. Folks like us are a threat to their "plan". We upset their status quo. We're bad for their businesses. We might cause the muds to riot and massacre. Etc, etc, etc. Therefore, we must be silenced at all costs.
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire
Monday - Friday, 7pm-8pm Central Time - AM 1380 WLRM Memphis, Tennessee
Do you live outside of the Memphis reception area and want to listen to our program?
TUNE INTO THE LIVE RADIO SHOW EACH WEEKNIGHT VIA THE WORLD WIDE WEB!
POLITICAL CESSPOOL BACK IN SPOTLIGHT...AGAIN!
It has come to our attention that the elitists who control the Tennessee Republican Party will be convening in Nashville on Saturday, March 25, to decide whether or not the God-given Constitutional right to run for public office applies to Mr. James Hart. Mr. Hart is one of three candidates (John Farmer and Rory Bricco are the others) that has satisfied state requirements to secure a spot on the Republican Primary ballot for the 8th U.S. Congressional District this August. Mr. Hart actually submitted more than three times as many signatures from registered voters than he was required to do. However, Mr. Hart is politically incorrect and some Republicans are out to suppress his voice.
But, it gets worse! These three men were invited to a debate, but the State GOP warned that if any local Republican club hosted a debate and invited James Hart, that they would face sanctions! So, The Political Cesspool has stepped up, at the behest of Mr. Farmer and Mr. Hart, and will be hosting this controversial debate on Tuesday, April 11, at 7:00 PM. Even if the Republican leadership votes to "remove" Hart from the ballot, the debate will still move forward, as Mr. Hart's attorney, Richard Barrett, has vowed to take the matter to court. Ask yourself this; Should a dictatorial GOP hierarchy have the power to decide who represents the party in the primary, or should the registered Republican voters in that district who nominated James Hart? It is also worth noting that James Hart was the Republican nominee in 2004 and garnered approximately 60,000 votes against Democrat John Tanner.
The venue of this debate is still being nailed down, but we are sending certified invitations to each of the candidates and will use our forum on the radio to promote this hot event. John Farmer will be my guest on The Political Cesspool on Monday night, March 20, to discuss the circus-like atmosphere that has surrounded this race. Mr. Farmer, a man who says he is a conservative first and a Republican second, has taken the courageous stand to support Mr. Hart's freedoms of speech and association, even though he is opposed to much of what Hart espouses. Men with the convictions of John Farmer are few and far between.
This debate will be held professionally and there will be no biases or favoritism towards any of the candidates. The Political Cesspool is proud to provide this service to our community, as everyone benefits when the freedom of speech is exercised. We are currently talking with a local newspaper editor to serve as moderator...
"Go, Nazis, Go!"
And what happened to Rounder's "Expose the Talmud" campaign? Seems like that should be on his website, not Revelations and other Christian material.
"Go, Nazis, Go!"
Why don't the rest of you people run for congress in your respective districts? I can't, i'm not 25 yet.
What do you have to lose? We can bitchslap these Republican assholes who have screwed the white racists who put them in office.
Maybe all WNs can begin allying right now, stormfront, vnn.
The graphic designers can begin making websites, etc.
What happened to the White Freedom Party? Why the silence? Was it all just bullshit from the start? Just click on the URL below and see what I mean. Something fishy here....
I've read a great deal of your posts, "Professor," and I'll agree that there's something fishy around here, but it appears to be you.
Jews Did 9/11
Can you make an audio of this?
Support Jews - Burn in Hell
And it is Revelation (singular) not Revelations, there was only one Revelation given to John. A lot of people will use that to detract from the message.
I agree it would make a good radio spot, if you could get the stations to run it.
Jews Did 9/11
I agree! A "win win" situation indeed! TONS of coverage can be expected outta this deal...and who knows, Glenn might even win!
![]()
Let's start spreading the word. The link to your web site is now on my blog. They'll be talking about this in NY soon. ]That would be something wouldn't it? What would the ZOGlings do if Glenn Miller had franking privileges?!? Not to mention a half a million dollar staff budget. :cheers:
Jews Did 9/11
Loose Change 2nd Edition @ Google Video (MUST See!!)
Loose Change 9/11 Website
Scholars For 9/11 Truth
9/11 Research WTC7.net
PentagonResearch.com
WingTV.net
9/11 Blogger
The Line In The Sand @ Google Video
Monday - Friday, 7pm-8pm Central Time - AM 1380 WLRM Memphis, Tennessee
Do you live outside of the Memphis reception area and want to listen to our program?
TUNE INTO THE LIVE RADIO SHOW EACH WEEKNIGHT VIA THE WORLD WIDE WEB!
POLITICAL CESSPOOL BACK IN SPOTLIGHT...AGAIN!
It has come to our attention that the elitists who control the Tennessee Republican Party will be convening in Nashville on Saturday, March 25, to decide whether or not the God-given Constitutional right to run for public office applies to Mr. James Hart. Mr. Hart is one of three candidates (John Farmer and Rory Bricco are the others) that has satisfied state requirements to secure a spot on the Republican Primary ballot for the 8th U.S. Congressional District this August. Mr. Hart actually submitted more than three times as many signatures from registered voters than he was required to do. However, Mr. Hart is politically incorrect and some Republicans are out to suppress his voice.
But, it gets worse! These three men were invited to a debate, but the State GOP warned that if any local Republican club hosted a debate and invited James Hart, that they would face sanctions! So, The Political Cesspool has stepped up, at the behest of Mr. Farmer and Mr. Hart, and will be hosting this controversial debate on Tuesday, April 11, at 7:00 PM. Even if the Republican leadership votes to "remove" Hart from the ballot, the debate will still move forward, as Mr. Hart's attorney, Richard Barrett, has vowed to take the matter to court. Ask yourself this]
It's disappointing that Hart is not yet assured ballot access. But at least he has an attorney, and obviously enough finances to take his case to court.
I believe the biggest fear among system leaders regarding bonafide pro-White candidates, is the federal law which forbids newspapers and radio and TV stations from denying paid political ads, no matter the content. The law also requires greatly reduced costs for ads, about half in many cases. For example, one 50,000 watt Springfield (MO) radio station that reaches my entire 10-county congressional district, charges only $5.00 for a full 60-second campaign broadcast. But in order to qualify, one must be an official candidate, approved by the Missouri Secretary of State.
BTW, I'm still trying to find out if official write-in candidates do, in fact, meet the qualification for mandatory media campaign ads. Everybody's giving me the "run around", on this issue.
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire
Speeches & Writings of Dr William Pierce
White Patriot Party
My Book - "A White Man Speaks Out"
It's disappointing that Hart is not yet assured ballot access. But at least he has an attorney, and obviously enough finances to take his case to court.
I believe the biggest fear among system leaders regarding bonafide pro-White candidates, is the federal law which forbids newspapers and radio and TV stations from denying paid political ads, no matter the content. The law also requires greatly reduced costs for ads, about half in many cases. For example, one 50,000 watt Springfield (MO) radio station that reaches my entire 10-county congressional district, charges only $5.00 for a full 60-second campaign broadcast. But in order to qualify, one must be an official candidate, approved by the Missouri Secretary of State.
BTW, I'm still trying to find out if official write-in candidates do, in fact, meet the qualification for mandatory media campaign ads. Everybody's giving me the "run around", on this issue.
Not only that but we have to listen to those adds over and over agian. It gets to the point where you want to blow the damn radio and TV up! it's not just that though..it's the jewish bought message in those adds that make it WORSE! Then they want to make difficult for pro whites like yourself to get an add at all!
I'm sure if you keep pushing the issue and giving them hell about it you'll find out if you can get one in.
Not only that but we have to listen to those adds over and over agian. It gets to the point where you want to blow the damn radio and TV up! it's not just that though..it's the jewish bought message in those adds that make it WORSE! Then they want to make difficult for pro whites like yourself to get an add at all!
I'm sure if you keep pushing the issue and giving them hell about it you'll find out if you can get one in.
Not one White person in a thousand has ever in their entire lives, heard a pro-white message on the radio. Thus, everybody including radio station managers, are absolutely shocked when they hear one. Warning alarm bells go off in their heads. "Danger !!!" "Racism !!!" And no matter how moderate the pro-white message is.
S.W. Missouri better get used to them though. Because if I'm allowed to become an official candidate for US Congress, they're gonna hear hundreds and from several different radio stations broadcasting thru out my 10 county congressional district.
Radio stations cannot refuse paid ads from official candidates for US Congress. And the same goes for TV stations and system newspapers.
The question is though: "Are write-in candidates considered by the law, to be official candidates?" And that's the question I've got to learn the answer to. The Missouri elections office and the Missouri Secretary of State's office personnel pretend they don't know.
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire
The question is though: "Are write-in candidates considered by the law, to be official candidates?" And that's the question I've got to learn the answer to. The Missouri elections office and the Missouri Secretary of State's office personnel pretend they don't know.
Do you have to wait for their permission? Why not start a write-in campaign and then stick it in their faces as a "fait accompli" ?
Do you have to wait for their permission? Why not start a write-in campaign and then stick it in their faces as a "fait accompli" ?
If I publicly announce I'm a "write -in" candidate now, it'll lessen the importance of my lawsuit, B.B. The GD court might say: "Well hell, he's a write-in candidate, so that's good enough."
The elections office gave me the necessary forms to fill out in which to declare my "write-in" candidacy. And I assume they'll in return, send me verification of receipt. But what I don't know is if that'll be sufficient to compel radio, TV, and newspapers to run my paid ads.
The deadline for declaring as a "write-in" is in July, so I've got plenty of time for that.
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire