RE: predator2prey

What purpose does it serve to publicly announce a non-alliance position with Islam?

The purpose is that I for one don't want to see white loyalists replacing whigger nigger worship with rag-head worship; this seems to be a growing trend amongst many of our people. Even though the media denounces the muslims, I'm sure the jews have a contingency plan (if not a primary plan) to lead awakened people right into the hands of islam.

People come to threads like this for info and many from the USA have not had direct contact with arab invaders pouring into their country. I feel I have a responsibility to diffuse the myth that the arabs are our salvation because I've experienced it first hand where many who look up to the muslim has not. I also feel it's a slap in the face to our European counterparts to say these people are our allies. It would be like europeans saying we should be working with mexicans so yes, I think publicly announcing a non-alliance position puts things in the proper perspective for all to see.

The only part of the muslim debacle that I will concede to is the encouragement of muslims to rid the middle east of the jew. That kind of support I can see but, in my opinion, this will lead to trouble too because if you listen closely to many of the arab world's leaders they'd like to see the jews back in europe. So, working even in this capacity could spell trouble for our european brothers. But on one position I won't budge and that is allowing the muslims into our confidence and turning our backs on them right in our own lands (yes, these are our lands although it may not seem that way right now). Like Metzger said in an earlier post of mine "going out of the frying pan and into the fire" is not a strategy which will bring redemption.

RE: predator2prey

The purpose is that I for one don't want to see white loyalists replacing whigger nigger worship with rag-head worship; this seems to be a growing trend amongst many of our people. Even though the media denounces the muslims, I'm sure the jews have a contingency plan (if not a primary plan) to lead awakened people right into the hands of islam.

Nowhere did I imply, that we should worship Muslims. As a matter of fact I’ll repeat what I said before about the intended relationship:

“This doesn’t mean that we must go to bed with them (Muslims) or have them in our lands once the jew is eradicated.” The alliance is to be formed only for the purpose of fighting the jew and in no way is to be considered the promotion of multiculturalism within our respective lands.

People come to threads like this for info and many from the USA have not had direct contact with arab invaders pouring into their country. I feel I have a responsibility to diffuse the myth that the arabs are our salvation because I've experienced it first hand where many who look up to the muslim has not.

Quote from my post # 83 to another poster on this thread;
BTW: Several of my immediate family still live in Europe and most of my wife’s family currently reside there as well. There is nothing that you can tell me of conditions for White people living in Europe that I don’t already know. (Our relatives are in Germany, Poland and France)

I also feel it's a slap in the face to our European counterparts to say these people are our allies. It would be like europeans saying we should be working with mexicans so yes,

To equate Muslims with mexicans in this instance is disingenuous. The mexican does nothing to resist the jew, they only facilitate the jew’s agenda.

I think publicly announcing a non-alliance position puts things in the proper perspective for all to see.

We disagree completely on this point.

The only part of the muslim debacle that I will concede to is the encouragement of muslims to rid the middle east of the jew. That kind of support I can see but, in my opinion, this will lead to trouble too because if you listen closely to many of the arab world's leaders they'd like to see the jews back in europe. So, working even in this capacity could spell trouble for our european brothers.

Of course we can agree that the Muslims should continue their resistance to jew tyranny, however, I fail to see that Muslims want jews in Europe when key Islamic leaders have publicly indicated that they would like to see jews exterminated from the face of the earth.

But on one position I won't budge and that is allowing the muslims into our confidence and turning our backs on them right in our own lands (yes, these are our lands although it may not seem that way right now).

I agree with you on this point. There is no need to get that close. But the fact remains that the Islamic countries have great financial resources, where WNs do not. There are indeed certain Islamic countries who are looking for trusted anti-jew allies in Western countries that they can fund for mutual interests. After all, it stands to reason that they would be looking for White moles in the kwa, when Semitic types are being racially profiled by ZOG. Hell yes, this is dangerous business and it would be nearly impossible to tell the difference between a sting and the real deal, but I think that as time goes on, this vital connection will be made and ZOG will be powerless to stop it.

Like Metzger said in an earlier post of mine "going out of the frying pan and into the fire" is not a strategy which will bring redemption.

Tom is a great guy and we should let him speak for himself in order to be debated on each point in it’s proper context.

RE: predator2prey

N

&#8220]

Any ethnic cleansing of non Westerners in Europe is good. The momentum once initiated could lead to cleansing of other more deeply entrenched hostile parasites. There is right now, today, a groundswell of popular reaction to the Muslim invasion of Europe. We must take advantage of this. This is the ethnic cleansing that offers itself today. It is a gift created by JudeoMasonic overreaching. It will be taken advantage of with or without us. This doesn't mean we have to declare hostilities to Iran, since Iran does not represent an immigrant problem in Europe. It is possible to do as Russia does, make a separate peace with Iran. Although it would be a big mistake to encourage their becoming a nuclear power.

 

RE: imadrifter

Any ethnic cleansing of non Westerners in Europe is good. The momentum once initiated could lead to cleansing of other more deeply entrenched hostile parasites. There is right now, today, a groundswell of popular reaction to the Muslim invasion of Europe. We must take advantage of this. This is the ethnic cleansing that offers itself today. It is a gift created by JudeoMasonic overreaching. It will be taken advantage of with or without us.

You have a valid point here. I would do nothing to stand in the way of the ethnic realignment in Europe. However, as a first option, I would try to amicably facilitate the relocation back to their homelands those displaced by the jew. If that didn’t work, then it’s on to plan B, the shallow trench, out behind the building.

This doesn't mean we have to declare hostilities to Iran, since Iran does not represent an immigrant problem in Europe. It is possible to do as Russia does, make a separate peace with Iran. Although it would be a big mistake to encourage their becoming a nuclear power.

Iran is next on the ZOG’s hit list. I believe that an incident will be manufactured to ignite the war against Iran and ZOG will try to bomb them into the stone-age as they’ve done with Afghanistan and Iraq. A war with Iran will be exponentially more costly to ZOG as these most recent wars and could very well be the big one that flushes the toilet. Maybe this realization is the reason for the balking.

Well, I guess we can agree to disagree. I'm not sure how to go about addressing each quote in a neat fashion like you did so please bear with me.

I wasn't saying you personally worship muslims but you have to admit there is almost a romantic tone that seems to be voiced amongst our people of late.

I don't have family in Europe but I do have friends and they would disagree with you regarding muslims 100%. Poland does not have a muslim problem so no arguement there. Germany's muslim problem is condensed in places like Berlin and Munich; something tells me your family doesn't live in one of these Turkish neighborhoods and is actively making alliances with the people there. If you approached any of these savages and reached out to them in friendship you'd probably get jumped in a heartbeat. A friend of mine lives in Berlin and sees this type of thing all the time. In France the niggers have all converted to islam (from what I understand) and rampaged through the streets of Paris for a month. Not sure how your family could have missed that travesty and I saw a lot of whites in photos getting their arses kicked in the streets of Paris. You can't deny the reality that muslims are indeed hostile towards whites. Dark skinned people are all the same and when a lot of them are in a white area they start to harass the local white population.

Equating mexicans with arabs IS INDEED a good likeness and there are many who would agree with me that the muslim invasion of Europe is worse than what we are facing here with the mexicans.

When muslims talk about exterminating jews from the earth I think you fail to understand that muslims consider jews white; that means we're next on their list. You think they discriminate between jews and whites? I've heard muslims say on dozens of occasions that jews are white. I'm sure they think white suckers who want to help them have one foot in the grave already.

Regarding Metzger, go to his site and listen to his latest broadcast on the matter; I think you'll find my quoting him was appropriate for the subject at hand and evidence that the old timers disagree with the idea we should NOT work with muslims
http://www.resist.com/
For further proof that there are strong personalitites in the stuggle who would agree with me listen to David Pringle's latest broadcast as well when he posts it (it was on Friday 9-22-06):
http://www.whitewire.net/?page_id=223

Do you think Zog is racially profiling arabs at all in any country besides the KWA, Israel and Britian? What makes you think arabs are being racially profiled and need white moles at all? This is your assumption.

I think you are not fully explaining where you think our people will stand IF we work with the muslims and rid the jew from europe. Do you plan on making a stand against the muslims who refuse to leave once your first objective is reached? Is this not a practical contingency to discuss? The muslim agenda is to indeed stay in white lands and spread islam throughout the world. It is important to expose the REAL agenda of these people and that is we will owe the muslims our land if they do the fighting for us.

For anyone hell bent on working with muslims I recommend inciting them to hatred towards any and all of our enemies. Facilitate distrust between ALL mud races and have them kill each other. We're smart enough to use their savagery and backwards superstitious beliefs against them.

Have you ever seen a muslim supporting any pro-white group? Where are these muslims whom we are to "work" with? I've seen muslims supporting our other mud enemies but never once have I seen them turn up at a rally to offer support. Do you think when the national socialist groups march in ANY country in europe that they have muslim support or do you think it's just the opposite? I believe it is marginalizing our efforts and our own solidarity to put such an empasis on a known enemy of our people. I say known enemy because I know for a fact what they have in store for whites in Europe; it's already begun. This rationale really reminds me of the bleeding heart liberals who live in lilly-white neighborhoods but actively promote immigration. While living safe from the threat they dictate that the people struggling with the non-white invaders should celebrate diversity. That is not to say YOU are a bleeding heart liberal. I merely use the bleeding heart liberal as a model for the point I am trying to make which is it is easy to say we should work with muslims when they are not in our own backyard.

RE: predator2prey

What purpose does it serve to publicly announce a non-alliance position with Islam?

We must put pressure on the jew to react to the “possibility” of a WN/Mulsim alliance. The threat of a potential alliance will force the jew to implement even more oppressive and draconian tactics that will only serve to bring this racial conflict to a head sooner.

The more pressure that the jew exerts upon White people, the easier time we will have gaining recruits.

Anything that destabilizes the jewish grip is a good thing. Keeping them guessing is destabilizing them.

Brutus, I know you were not adressing me, but I would say you make a very good point here, and I wil lsay one I have probly not given enough thought of to.
The only problem I might see with that is that, while yes it might put pressure on the jew, it might also make some very good whites who have sympathy at heart with the various WN/WP/NS movements think twice about people who are seeming to be freinds with people that they consider to be terrorists and religously alien.
All muslims are not terrorists no of course not, and maybe that is the picture that the jew would like to make of them, but I think it is something to be considered wether making freinds with arabs/muslims [or the "possibility"] would be the best thing as far as numbers for us go and to me I don't think there is much more important than getting people with good hearts, minds and genetics aware and involved.

I thank you and others here for comments in this thread I started, I did not expect it to be so long or so uhh ... Debatable lets say, but I am glad for it, and thank again those who make their good points without insult to the position and views of others.

You have a valid point here. I would do nothing to stand in the way of the ethnic realignment in Europe. However, as a first option, I would try to amicably facilitate the relocation back to their homelands those displaced by the jew. If that didn’t work, then it’s on to plan B, the shallow trench, out behind the building

And there is the heart of a major part of the problem. they are not going to leave willingly and when you go on to plan B, how are muslims, even the ones living in their own lands going to react to this(you know, the ones who were just made stronger by an alliance that took out one of their major enemies?) They certainly aren't going to stand by and allow this to happen. And what happens if a country like iran has nukes at this point(that I am guessing many here, support) Many bad possible scenerios.

And there is the heart of a major part of the problem. they are not going to leave willingly and when you go on to plan B, how are muslims, even the ones living in their own lands going to react to this(you know, the ones who were just made stronger by an alliance that took out one of their major enemies?) They certainly aren't going to stand by and allow this to happen. And what happens if a country like iran has nukes at this point(that I am guessing many here, support) Many bad possible scenerios.

anyone, for whatever reason, that doesn't want iran to have nukes, is a friend of israel.

throw out the jew, and we can deal with the "muslims", i'm talking here the niggerish variety invading europe, easily. muslim is a religion. many races are muslim. unlike joooodism. jewdizm is for izzy's spawn only. learn the difference.

it's the afreakan muslims that are the problem for europe. not iran. and the problem is the symptom. the jew is the disease.

There are muslims of all races living in europe not just niggers. You honestly believe that things are going to be as simple as you seem to think and that Muslims are not going to react with whatever measures may be neccessary if Brutus's plan B was put into action? lol. look at the way they react to a cartoon or a speech from the pope. These reactions took place all over the Muslim world. God damn don't be stupid.

I don't see Muslims deciding what I read in the news paper or what effluent
spews from the TV set, nor do they set the cost I pay for food.
The JEW is the underpinning that must receive the highest priority, they
have become an unbearable tax on humanity.
The head of the JEW snake must be removed in order to make it harmless..

RE: HG

What’s good for the goose is good for the Muslim as well.

When the jew is globally defeated, the Muslim will have just as must right to expel Whites or anyone else from their territories, as we would have the right to expel them from White homelands.

Prior to the jew’s rise to ultimate power, most of the wars between nations have been fought over boundary disputes. Since post WWII, boundaries are no longer a principle issue, save for those territories that abut israel. Most of the world’s conflicts have been jew-instigated battles among the different factions within a single nation. Yugoslavia is a good example.

Most nations are not extreme monocultures except for some Asian nations. Japan comes pretty close. That is because they have resisted the jew’s importation of immigrants into their country. And unlike Yugoslavia, possibly Japan’s geographical situation played a part there as well, with regard to their homogeneity.

I would imagine that after the jew is eradicated, humankind can get back to that age old routine of boundary dispute wars instead of fighting battles amongst our own countrymen. Wouldn’t that be nice.

Killing our own kin at the behest of the jew is a terrible thing.

Muslims are not a race. Period.

Muslims are not a race. Period.

What post on this thread said, Muslims are a race ???

DUh,, and your point is??

There are muslims of all races living in europe not just niggers. You honestly believe that things are going to be as simple as you seem to think and that Muslims are not going to react with whatever measures may be neccessary if Brutus's plan B was put into action? lol. look at the way they react to a cartoon or a speech from the pope. These reactions took place all over the Muslim world. God damn don't be stupid.

Quote: "God damn don't be stupid"

lol The stupidity of some white folks really scares me. lol

RE: predator2prey

Do you think Zog is racially profiling arabs at all in any country besides the KWA, Israel and Britian? What makes you think arabs are being racially profiled and need white moles at all? This is your assumption.

It’s not my assumption, it’s espionage 101. The CIA and Mossad and a host of others use moles. When there is a need for covert penetration, use a mole.

I think you are not fully explaining where you think our people will stand IF we work with the muslims and rid the jew from europe. Do you plan on making a stand against the muslims who refuse to leave once your first objective is reached? Is this not a practical contingency to discuss? The muslim agenda is to indeed stay in white lands and spread islam throughout the world. It is important to expose the REAL agenda of these people and that is we will owe the muslims our land if they do the fighting for us.

Our folk will stand behind competent leadership. I’m of the opinion that negotiations between the nations will be greatly enhanced when the jew is not around to cause trouble. Who knows what wonderful diplomatic accords can come from jew-free talks between nations? In this regard, I see allot of pluses.

For anyone hell bent on working with muslims I recommend inciting them to hatred towards any and all of our enemies. Facilitate distrust between ALL mud races and have them kill each other. We're smart enough to use their savagery and backwards superstitious beliefs against them.

The Muslim certain doesn’t need our help inciting them to hatred. They are oozing gallons of hate for the jew on their own. I can’t imagine any deeper hatred then that which would compel them to strap on a suicide belt.

Have you ever seen a muslim supporting any pro-white group?

Not yet.

Where are these muslims whom we are to "work" with? I've seen muslims supporting our other mud enemies but never once have I seen them turn up at a rally to offer support.

We can understand that the jew media has created tremendous acrimony between our races. With the jew standing between us it’s nearly impossible to discuss differences of opinion or to work out problems. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has repeatedly reached-out to George Bush looking to discuss things, but the jew is always right there, telling Bush not to listen to him. Why is the jew afraid to let Bush talk to the Iranians? Could it be that they might tell Bush about the jews who are manipulating him? This is too obvious.

Do you think when the national socialist groups march in ANY country in europe that they have muslim support or do you think it's just the opposite? I believe it is marginalizing our efforts and our own solidarity to put such an empasis on a known enemy of our people.

There is no great emphasis being placed on this alliance, it’s only you and me talking. Yes, I did say that there is a growing consensus for an alliance and I stand by that remark. However, any actual alliance would not be a topic for open discussion. People go to jail for talking to people who ZOG defines as terrorists. It should be noted that Hitler kept his initial meetings with the Mufti quiet for a couple of years.

I say known enemy because I know for a fact what they have in store for whites in Europe; it's already begun. This rationale really reminds me of the bleeding heart liberals who live in lilly-white neighborhoods but actively promote immigration.

Now please don’t go off half-cocked and imply that I’m anything like a bleeding heart. There is nothing more important to me then securing a White homeland. If that can only come about by eliminating every other race on the planet, I’m for it. Aryans have a long tradition of literally slaughtering anyone foolish enough to get in the way. We may have to tap into that genetic propensity very soon.

While living safe from the threat they dictate that the people struggling with the non-white invaders should celebrate diversity. That is not to say YOU are a bleeding heart liberal. I merely use the bleeding heart liberal as a model for the point I am trying to make which is it is easy to say we should work with muslims when they are not in our own backyard.

O.K. I see your point about the bleeding heart.

You’ve made some very good points, however I’m still not convinced that a limited alliance wouldn’t work. Certainly there would be great peril involved. These are desperate times for desperate measures, and we must make certain that we close no doors that might help.