<strong>Addendum: My email dueling partner and I had one last email exchange in which we agreed it is nothing personal, and neither wishes misfortune or damnation on the other.</strong>

Below is an email exchange I had with someone -- a real verbal duel between one of us and one of them.

What is particularly fascinating is that we are generational contemporaries, and he had an old MindWeapon that was used on me and anyone else who expressed a racially conservative view on the miscegenation question through the 1980's and 1990's by college students -- Freudian sexual shaming.

I knew many guys who said they didn't want to speak against race-mixing because they didn't want to "seem insecure." It was this that led me to develop my theory of Jewish Mindweapons and Meme War.

Untested until now, my theory of MindWar has been that, when you are conscious of Jewish MindWeapons being deployed, they are neutralized. Those who are vulnerable to Jewish MindWeapons are those who do not contextualize the attack as Jewish MindWar, but mentally "blush" and shut down and the Jewish MindWarrior successfully wins the confrontation.

Freudian sexual shaming, which I will give an example of, created the "blushing" response in the brain. This is not the whole exchange, but it is where the Freudian sexual shaming starts. I began the email with a small note of appreciation in order to lure him further into the conversation. He had just written me several paragraphs of cited research to prove some point.

Then I set the trap.

The trap was revealing that White preservation is psychologically motivated by aesthetics. This is something we should all admit to ourselves. There's nothing at all wrong with it, or "pathological." These normal aspects of White human nature have been pathologized by Jewish Mind War.

My dueling partner thought this was his opening to deliver the <strong>coup de grace</strong>, the killing blow to my psyche, that would leave me sobbing in a corner, rolled up in the fetal position. That's exactly what I wanted him to think.

Because that leads to multiple exchanges where Freudian sexual shaming is attempted, but the MindWeapon brain, trained on qigong and mathematics and hours in the garden, does not blush or blink, but attacks the attack, wing chun style.

The Jewish Meme Weapons that worked for decades, work no longer.

To

Wow, you must have taken a lot of time to write all that! I appreciate it, even if it doesn't change my mind. At it's root, my objection to racial mixing is aesthetic; I simply would rather Whites stay White and maintain their recessive features, than turn brown. I think this is what motivates most of us, though we have learned from the Jews to use any and all other justifications to further our ends.

I see that you like to try to provoke people with talk of violence -- the whole "cowboy up" stuff, and telling me that I'll "never hurt me (you) or blacks or Jews" et cetera. Implied in this is that violence was somehow my goal or end -- something I never said. I never threatened you, or even fantasized about mass violence. It's projecting on your part -- an excellent example of Jewish MindWar. That may work on Southron hotheads, but not on me. I grew up around Jews. I know you people quite well, and that you fight, and win, without hot lead and cold steel, at least since Meyer Amschel Rothschild and his son Nathan, as well as Marx and Freud and Boas.

The new White nationalism, WN 2.0, is not about hot lead and cold steel. We know better. The movies of the 80's -- The Blues Brothers, Back to School, Caddyshack -- were all about convincing whites that we had already lost the MindWar. MindWar is the deliberate, aggressive convincing of all parties in a war, that we will win that war.

And you did win. But no war is won for all time, and no weapon is invincible forever.

From

<em>so if you want white people to have white babies for aesthetic reasons, why do you care about integration per se? I mean, are you so sexually insecure that you think white women just can't help but go make babies with black guys? Hmm..interesting projection on your part. I mean, there is no reason on Earth to think that light skinned people are going to ever go away, nor should they (and I think such persons can indeed be quite beautiful and wouldn't want them to ever go away either, despite wanting such persons to have their power and hegemony broken up)...so what is the fear? Go make babies...whatever. No one is stopping you. I can't figure out, other than some strange psychological paranoia on your part, why that would be sufficient reason to oppose multicultural society per se...you keep moving the bar whenever your claims are shown false and now I think we're at the root of it, I suppose, but it still makes very little logical sense.

Funny too that you seem to think we Jews are the ones who are clannish and seek to maintain our type (and according to idiots like MacDonald, our genotype specifically, as well as culture), but yet ignore that most Jews (at least in the U.S., like myself) don't marry other Jews, freely reproduce with non-Jews, and clearly don't care nearly so much about genotype (whatever one takes that to really mean, racially) as you do...once again, white nats project onto others what they themselves are hung up on...
</em>

To

Miscegenation happens with integration. Your Jewish Freudian MindWar attempts to call it "sexual insecurity" no longer work on me. That's so 30 years ago, dude.

Also, a lot of teenaged white girls get preg from sexually aggressive blacks and then regret it later in life, but once they have one mixed race kid, they are less desirable to white men, and they can't go back. See this heart wrenching video by dkidwell -- she says that she had a black boyfriend in high school, and after that, the white guys considered her contaminated even though she was a virgin all through high school.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u12_c7RRtCc&feature=plcp"]White women & black men - YouTube[/ame]

So yes, it's all about saving white girls from the horrible fate such as dkidwells. You can call me "sexually insecure" all day -- that Jewdi Mind Trick doens't work any more. LOL.

From

<em>But Rob, this is lunacy:

Why does miscegenation happen? I mean, the number of babies born to white women who were raped by black men are obviously far too small to constitute a demographic trend, for God's sakes. So it can't be because you actually believe there is going to be forced rape to produce a black takeover -- that's insane, seriously -- so what is it, if not insecurity that white women will CHOOSE to be with black men. And why would that be Rob? I'm guessing it has something to do with Phil Rushton's theories, right???? Hah! That is insecurity Rob...

And if white guys think a woman who has sex with a black guy is contaminated that is insane: that is the kind of bigotry that white people need to fix...and it too is likely because they are afraid that well, they won't, you know, measure up...which is rooted in the kind of psycho-sexual insecurities that white nats are literally wallowing in, as per Rushton...this is all so transparent...

You are inidated by the presumed size of the black male penis Rob...that is what this is about: you, Rushton, Kevin MacDonald, everyone at Stormfront. It's so incredibly obvious now...In fact, the obsession of certain whites with race and IQ correlations have long been connected to these sexual insecurities too, as discussed and documented in the new book, Straightening the Bell Curve, which explores the interesting psychological weaknesses and fears of everyone from Shockley to Rushton to Jensen...

all very revealing. White nationalists need mass psychotherapy, or medication...
</em>

To

The desperation is all yours. Your secret weapon -- the black dick thing, isn't working! Omigod!

More accurately, it's a combination of dominant genes and the fact that blacks put a lot more effort into picking up white females than white men do, because white men are doing things like learning to program computers, or fix cars, or a million other things.

Black males are like carbon monoxide bonding more readily to the alveoli than oxygen. Just because CO bonds more readily to alveoli doesn't mean it's superior. CO has to be kept segregated from breathing space, and blacks have to be kept segregated from white breeding grounds. Also, you aren't even going to try to argue that black males don't have much higher rates of STD's, are you?

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/aa/

African Americans are the racial/ethnic group most affected by HIV.
In 2009, African Americans comprised 14% of the US population but accounted for 44% of all new HIV infections

But you can talk about black dicks all day. It doesn't work on White Nationalism 2.0, because it's MindWar, and we know what your MindWar is.

So you've taken your 2 best shots -- calling me a coward and the whole Freudian black dick thing. They both fell flat. It's Evolution, ! You Jews overused your anti-white Mindwar antibiotics, and we evolved so that it doesn't affect us any more. Just like MRSA -- see the video there, it's very interesting and very applicable to an Evolving White Nationalism. We are MRSA.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/080401_mrsa

From

<em>I'm not using tricks at all...I don't much care about you; I'm just exploring the sound of your paranoia and the meaning behind your words...it's pretty revealing

Here's the problem Rob. If racial separatism is natural, and if there is a species instinct for survival in all breeds/races, etc, which extends to choices about mating and offspring, then why would white women need to be protected at all in terms of the voluntary side of things (putting aside rape for a second)..no matter how much e black men put in trying to woo white women, presumably the species instinct would kick in and white women (whose IQs are no different than white men) would be smart enough not to be lured in or fooled by all that black male sweet-talking, wining and dining, etc (especially given the longstanding recognition that in terms of sexual partners, heterosexual women are actually more likely, for evolutionary reasons, to choose men who they feel can be good providers, which given economic inequities between whites and blacks, you would think would drive white women into the arms of white men, not black men!). So unless you wish to make the fundamentally absurd argument that white women haven't evolved the same species instinct as white men, or that black men have some strange voodoo power over the otherwise normal species instinct of white women, and their normal IQ, or just concede that maybe it IS the dick thing and they "just can't resist," I'm not sure how you can continue on with a straight face. Unless white women are uniquely weak (which if you believe that, no wonder white women don't gravitate to white nationalism!), or black men are uniquely, well...you know...there would be nothing about integration per se which would lead to widespread miscegenation. Your fears are all out of sync with actual rates of such miscegenation, and speak to something else..
</em>

To

<b>especially given the longstanding recognition that in terms of sexual partners, heterosexual women are actually more likely, for evolutionary reasons, to choose men who they feel can be good providers, which given economic inequities between whites and blacks, you would think would drive white women into the arms of white men, not black men!</b>
,

Again, you are like, so 30 years ago in your thinking! You still think and talk like the undergrad at University. You missed the Roissy revolution in female psychology. See

http://heartiste.wordpress.com/

Review the following, which are posted along the top: The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
Alpha Assessment Submissions
Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
Dating Market Value Test For Men

Young women, when they are their most fertile, don't choose "good providers." Teenaged white girls who get infected with mulattoes and AIDS, like "Nushawns girls" aren't looking for good providers, they are looking for excitement. Whose more exciting? The hip hopper on the corner, or the white computer geek? But the hip hopper is analogous to carbon monoxide. if the white girl goes for the hip hopper, her life will be destroyed.

If these "mudshark phase" white girls just had sex and didn't get pregnant, it wouldn't be as bad. But black males seem to be allergic to condoms, hence their high rates of STD's. So what seems to happen is that there is a high frequency of pregnancy for mudsharks, while white boys are more concerned about being responsible for a baby they make and hence are more likely to use condoms (hence lower STD rates among whites). This is what makes blacks an especial biohazard to the white race, and to all non-blacks. Notice I am not particularly concerned about Chinese or even Hispanics. It is why we need to exclude them from our breeding spaces, as carbon monoxide must be excluded from our breathing spaces. Heck, even the Israelis agree with us!

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/05/24/deport-the-sudanese-violent-israeli-race-riots-draw-condemnation-empathy/

So get up to speed on Heartiste and get back to me. Women like "exciting" men, not good providers.

From

<em>you think that website by some amateur psychologist (who has commandments of POON) telling men how to basically control women is science??? Amazing! He's some wanna be stud playing upon the insecurities of guys like you...

you are in a contradiction: either women are not every intelligent and are inherently manipulatable by black men (who, according to you are their intellectual inferiors), in which case you are denying species instinct, and eliminating your racial evolutionary theories, or you are admitting that they just want the excitement of the big black dick, which is my guess....

It must drive you nuts to know that according to research on American pornography, (see Bob Jensen's work, for instance) interracial porn is among the most popular genres, and that its white MEN who are driving that trend (so it seems y'all are both angered by it and secretly attracted to it...)

Interestingly, among young black and white men, black men are more likely to use condoms than white men, so your data is wrong: those rates don't continue that way through older adulthood, but among young men it's true (check the CDC)...the STD rates have to do with the fact that poorer populations almost always have higher rates of STDs because when they contract something like syph or gonorrhea, they are less likely to find out (because they are less likely to have regular health care or checkups), and are therefore more likely to spread it than whites who, because of better health care access are more likely to get treatment and not to spread it. Although the average number of sexual partners for black men is higher than white men, the differences are not nearly sufficient, in and of themselves, to explain differential rates of STDs, or HIV, or anything like that...

Anyway, keep following those rules of poon, and I'm sure, one day, you'll manage to get laid...what's funny is, your claim is that white men are too busy programming computers, etc to get the women that the average rapper gets, but aside form the inherent craziness of this claim, I think its funny that your lack of regular pussy can't even be written off to that. You haven't programmed anything, invented anything, or done anything with your mind sufficient to explain why you've been so busy. I'm so certain of this that I literally dare you to share your occupational status with me. You are no professional success, or (obviously) a sexual one...which is to say that it must really steam you that you can't even take solace from Rushton's promise about dick size being inversely related to intelligence...in your case, it appears you got neither, which must really suck!

I will be writing an essay about this fascinating discussion, just so you know, and I will be using your name, and your email...I think people should definitely know about your amazingly insecure views!

thanks for the laugh
</em>

To

Holy escalation to the personal realm Batman! Here I thought we were having an interesting conversation, and now you are going to "out" me, a non public person with controversial views.

Fortunately I am a loser with no accomplishments, and hence nothing to lose.

That's fine. I have been ready for this to happen though I prefer it not to have. I stand behind everything I ever said, and everything I am. Just remember, you escalated, not me.

Two small requests. Publish the full exchange, and <strong>turn on comments.</strong>

From

<em>I mean, don't feel bad...being an office manager, organic farmer and occasional ESL instructor in Windham CT isn't to be a TOTAL loser...but in racial terms, for a big, bad member of the master race, well, I mean, ya know...I'm sure you're the absolute BEST office managing, organic farming teacher of English to Chinese people of anyone, anywhere...really!

Actually, I won't mention your name in the piece, because honestly it would be tacky, and it would suggest that these views were yours alone, but sadly, I hear lots of white nat rhetoric that appears to obsess over the psycho sexual, so you're not alone! It's the broader commonality of white nationalist sexual fears (like the way y'all spread the absolute lies about how the murders of Christian and Newsom in Knoxville, which were horrific enough, involved sexual mutilation, when the police, coroner, DA and vics parents all said they did not.). that you all believed and spread that lie speaks to your sexual insecurities...that and much more...

Yes indeed, you all are quite the bundle of phobias and inadequacies...which both makes you dangerous and pathetic...

Here's my tip, BTW about how to get women, since you seem so enthralled by that, as evidenced by your passing along of that "pick up artist" type website... don't be a sexist pig who refers to them as poon, and thinks manipulation is the key to relationships...

Easy, and really, it works...insecure guys have problems, by definition with finding partners...that, not black rappers, is your problem...

Good luck with that...
</em>

To

You can bash Roissy but his views answered a lot of questions that a lot of people have had for years. Every post he makes gets hundreds of comments.

For example, why do lots of "nice" beta males go without girlfriends/wives, but alpha male "cads" who talk down to women do quite well? The answer is that beta males (and lower) are needy and they project this, and females sense "low dating market value" in them, even though he might be a perfectly nice guy with a good income. Meanwhile, the biker with a meth habit and an income derived from identity theft projects "I don't give a crap about you or any woman" signals high dating market value.

And anyone who works in the family court system sees women rescinding restraining orders, refusing to testify in domestic violence cases, going back to so-called abusers. Why? Because they love the excitement, the drama, they feel animal attraction for so-called abusive men. If their abuse boyfriend died, they'd find another abusive boyfriend. In a certain sense, these women are teaching men to be abusive, because they reward them and bear their children, while the non abusive "beta males" go without. Roissy goes deep into these issues -- he's not all about "picking up women." If you want to pick an internet fight with him by calling him an amateur psychologist, by all means.

It is interesting that you tried to make it personal and attack me for my lack of achievements and sexual insecurity. These sorts of attacks worked as recently as the 1990's, and hey, if you can make someone shrivel up and go cry in a corner by calling him a racist/loser/small dick, who am I to criticize that? Whatever works to win the fight. It worked for you for years -- that's why you escalated and escalated, in disbelief that the good old Jewish Mindweapons of Freudian sexual shaming and achievement shaming were not having the desired effect.

The "lack of personal achievement" thing, I believe it's called "naches" in the Jewish community, isn't universal. What would be a terrible insult to a Jewish or Chinese person falls flat when hurled at an Irishman like me. But it does reveal that you probably grew up with a lot of pressure to succeed by conventional standards.

So whose vision shall triumph over the next ten years? Yours or mine? The wild card is the financial crisis. It's my belief that multiracialism depends on a growing economy, and Benjamin Friedman's book "The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth" supports this view. Unlike you, I am not certain whose side will win.

You mentioned that you want to break the hegemony of white people. Surprisingly, I want the same thing, because the white people who will get broken are the ones who are supporting multiracialism -- the successful businessmen.

The thing is, when you introduce a radical change to a system, you can't be sure what you are going to get -- the old "be careful what you wish for." History suggests to me that this is as good as it gets for multiracialists -- stability and prosperity and economic growth is your friend. Any disruptions will go to my side of the ledger. The second these successful businessmen feel like the black and brown people are taxing them to the poorhouse, they'll turn to the fascist werewolves waiting in the wings. You probably read Trotsky's pamphlet on Fascism:

http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm

Right now the bourgeouis support your side, more or less. Sure they say mean things about Mein Obama, but they have not yet embraced being called racists or White nationalists. Not yet.