JP:
Generally the "name the Jew" strategy is this flawed idea that if you keep finding the Jew behind every possible news story, for some reason that will "wake up" the white populace.

Is this really saying not to name the Jew, or is it saying something along the lines of keep it more realistic, as in not seeing the jew behind every tree?

Are you a real idiot? Or do you just love to post fatuous rhetorical questions?
Just vote and shut up.

Better still, go read some more of Slowjewski's posts and answer your own dumb questions. Take a dramamine, his spin may make you a little dizzy, especially on the WTC Bldg. #7 thread.
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=22124

Is this really saying not to name the Jew, or is it saying something along the lines of keep it more realistic, as in not seeing the jew behind every tree?

Are you a real idiot? Or do you just love to post fatuous rhetorical questions?
Just vote and shut up.

I did vote. And obviously I said what I did because of this:

Other posters argue that the Jew should not be named, that it does no good.

For which you put up a post, that, at least to me was not implying what you said it was.

Just vote and shut up.

Better still, go read some more of Slowjewski's posts and answer your own dumb questions. I haven't taken his words out of context.This person is all about defending the jew. Moreso than you were when you first arrived here, moreso than your pal, Intrepid; he with the condo in Tel Aviv. Take a dramamine, JP's spin may make you a little dizzy, especially on the WTC Bldg. #7 thread. http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=22124

I did vote. And obviously I said what I did because of this:

For which you put up a post, that, at least to me was not implying what you said it was.

I have already seen that thread and some of his other posts. So he doesn't think that it is an undisputable fact that the Jews were behind 9/11(I disagree, but don't see it as an undisputable fact, as you and others do) as well as almost every "terrorist" attack and almost every thing else that happens. That is not the same thing as saying "not to name the Jew."

What you don't seem to get is that when you "name the Jew" in such a way as to suggest the Jews are basically behind every world event(with not a real lot to back that up) all that really does is make every thing else you say look insane to people. No need to call me a Jew lover, or a kike-a-like or whatever else. Though I know it's coming.

Who do you think is going to go with the second choice, besides maybe selecting it as a joke?

Just vote and shut up.

Better still, go read some more of Slowjewski's posts and answer your own dumb questions. I haven't taken his words out of context.This person is all about defending the jew. Moreso than you were when you first arrived here, moreso than your pal, Intrepid] http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=22124 [/url]

No need to be abusive to the lady.She asked a valid question.Try a little courtesy occasionally:it is the Aryan thing to do.
Your poll could have been a bit better thought out with a few more options and a little expansion of the question.
I for one would name the jew and do so.I have howevee noticed a disturbing trend arising on this board amongst certain members who ridicule others n true SF fashion for naming the jew.They not only don`t see a "red under every bed" but they don`t see any reds at all.
I would argue that such posters are not only misguided but potential allies of ZOG and we should be wary of them.
He who does not recognise that the jew is our archenemy has no place in our movement.

No need for your post. You, too, can shut up and vote.
First, tell the forum what other options you think should be added to this yes/no poll. Would you like a "maybe"? An "I don't know"? A "never on Sunday"?

No need to be abusive to the lady.She asked a valid question.Try a little courtesy occasionally:it is the Aryan thing to do.
Your poll could have been a bit better thought out with a few more options and a little expansion of the question.
I for one would name the jew and do so.I have howevee noticed a disturbing trend arising on this board amongst certain members who ridicule others n true SF fashion for naming the jew.They not only don`t see a "red under every bed" but they don`t see any reds at all.
I would argue that such posters are not only misguided but potential allies of ZOG and we should be wary of them.
He who does not recognise that the jew is our archenemy has no place in our movement.

No need for your post. You, too, can shut up and vote.
First, tell the forum what other options you think should be added to this yes/no poll. Would you like a "maybe"? An "I don't know"? A "never on Sunday"?

If you care to check the poll instead of being abusive to senior members of the forum you will see that I have already voted!
I just think that the way in which you have handled the issue is rather clumsy and over simplistic.
There are some like me who see the jew`s hand in most things!!!!!!!!!
Then there are others who may recognise the workings of the jew but who do not ascribe all things to them and then there are those who totally ignore the jew! So you see not everything is black and white,if you excuse the pun!
We should be analysing why people underestimate the danger of the jew and confront the root causes of their denial.If you are going to be discourteous to everyone who posts on your thread you will soon find that it will be ignored!

Are you a real idiot? Or do you just love to post fatuous rhetorical questions?
Just vote and shut up.

Better still, go read some more of Slowjewski's posts and answer your own dumb questions. Take a dramamine, his spin may make you a little dizzy, especially on the WTC Bldg. #7 thread.
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=22124

Momus is back! Glad to see you here again; things were getting boring.

JP: Generally the "name the Jew" strategy is this flawed idea that if you keep finding the Jew behind every possible news story, for some reason that will "wake up" the white populace.

I agree with this. I may be new here, but I've been lurking since I joined a day or two ago and have seen some pretty far "out there" theories regarding jewish infuence in the world.

Generally speaking, what a member in this page said earlier about not seeing a jew behind every tree is fairly astute.

Working in education has shown me alot concerning my jewish colleagues, but I wouldn't blame all jews for all social ills. Thats just ignorant.

Could someone also explain the first post better for me as well?

Many believe that the treacherous Tribe should be named and exposed, their crimes brought to light for all the world to see

.

If, as I've guessed from lurking here, jews control all facets of the government and our lives, who exactly would "bring them to justice"?

Surely you don't think hundreds of thousands of police officers and soldiers would give up their benefits, salaries, and pensions in some sort of mutiny?

however, understand that other racial problems are due to niggers, spics and multiculturalist white people.

Often, many of our fellow whites are virulent multiculturalists.
To ignore the fundamental problems beyond the jews is not a wise decision.

Many people see the racial question as a bit mroe complicated than just the god damn jews.
Jews would NEVER have been able to do what they did without massive support from many whites.

reality. deal with it.

Gosh, MOMUS! What a hard test. It took me all morning...

And, I don't see a jew behind every tree. In my mind's eye, I see a jew, and a tree, and a rope, and a noose...but then I'm leaving the point of this thread. Yes, name the Jew.

Enkidu

Other posters argue that the Jew should not be named, that it does no good. Tench and JP enjoy a festival of such sentiment here:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=22135
What do you think? Name the Yid or not? Show where you stand, vote your preference.

Tench seems to be advocating marxism is the enemy nonsense. Of course, the overwhelmingly Jewish inspiration for and composition of marxism doesn't seem to be relevant.

Bottom line is No Jews, Just Right. :box:

Is this really saying not to name the Jew, or is it saying something along the lines of keep it more realistic, as in not seeing the jew behind every tree?

Hey Momus, the above phrase "Seeing the jew behind every tree", is typical kike/kike-alike rhetoric designed to discredit our efforts to educate our people about the jews.

FadetheButcher and his cabal of apologists for the jews post dozens of similar phrases routinely, in their attempts to discredit exposures of the jews.

For example, they'll throw out a bone from time to time containing mild criticism of the jews to fool WNs into believing they are only being "realistic" and objective on the subject, then continue on with their defense of the jews, including the use of disarming phrases such as "Those VNN'ers see jews behind every tree", etc, etc, etc.

One hears the same "disarming" phrases (distractions and misinformations) on TV and radio talk shows, and in the press to make fools out of genuine, jew-wise WN spokespersons.

This forum is full of these GD kike-alikes. Thanks for combatting them. Most VNN'ers lack the stomach and intelligence to help you. Keep up the patriotic work.