Maybe your son can use this as a source, I found this to be pretty good.

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=1153

Nietzsche called tolerance generous self-restraint. There, that's my contribution. It's all I can manage at this time of night.

Have the essay be about tolerance of "alternative points of view" rather than jews/muds. Your son can write about David Irving in prison in Germany for thought crimes and about intolerance for Prussian Blue, the twin White singers. Just turn their whole idea of tolerance on its head.

Have the essay be about tolerance of "alternative points of view" rather than jews/muds.

Or, if he really wants to be different...write about "tolerance" from a mechanical engineering viewpoint. He can submit a paper without any feel good crap, and concentrate strictly on math.

Just remember to make sure he writes it in such as a tone as he doesn't expect the teacher to flip out. There is no advantage simply in pissing the teacher off.
Tell your son to be the epitome of innocence and not to 'rub it in' in any way! Just give the teacher something to think about while fulfilling the letter of the assignment.

Okay all you VNNers...my son's senior English class has given him an essay to write....about TOLERANCE. He wants to do something "a little different" than the expected Jew whining that everyone else will be doing...he wants to show the downside of Tolerance.

So, we are asking your help, input, sources, etc. He's going to start it off with the quote that one of the members here uses about Tolerance being how far a machine can deviate from the norm before it screws up the entire machine.

Thanks for helping with this little project ]
That is a tough problem Schnee, for if your son's submited essay is from a pro White perspective, or even just suspected as being so, then he will automatically recieve an F and much trouble to boot.
This needs to be approached subtley and indirectly, and most importantly (seemingly) innocently.
I would sugest something along the lines of...... tolerance must be balanced by intolerance in order ensure the healthy functioning an idividual or indeed a whole society; for too much tolerance is just as bad as too much intolerance.
Tolerance literally means putting up with something that is inconvenient or distasteful. For example: I tolerate pigeons in my garden even though they eat most of the food that I put out for the other birds. But I would not, and indeed should not tolerate rats doing the same. And I tolerate my neighbour playing her loud rap music occasionally during the day, but I would not, and should not tolerate it more often, or late at night.
Tolerance is NOT a virtue if it means putting up with that which is harmful and destructive; on the contrary, it is weakness and stupidity.
I hope that has been of some help Schnee.

 

Maybe a focus on how White American Citizens are tolerating themselves out of a place to live and out of existance itself. That being said, cheers to your son for taking such an approach and cheers to you for supporting him.
:cheers:

14/88

I suggest as a theme: Tolerance is not a virtue. A virtue is a behavioral trait which is appropriate under all circumtances such as honor, integrity, honesty or courage. Whether tolerance is appropriate or not depends on the cicumstances.

Your son could give a set of examples of situations where tolerance is appropriate and where it is not. For example:

I would tolerate my neighbor building bookcases in his house; I would not tolerate him building bombs.

I would tolerate him growing tomatoes in his yard; I would not tolerate him growing marijuana.

I would tolerate him having sex in his bedroom; I would not tolerate him having sex in the backyard where my children could see him.

I would tolerate him owning a gun; I would not tolerate him firing his gun up into the air outside of his house.

You get the idea. You can easily make up your own set of such opposing situations. The key though is that tolerance is not at all a virtue. Its moral appropriateness depends entirely on what you are being asked to tolerate.

Your son's almost assuredly liberal teacher will counter with specific situations for your son to respond to. Homosexuality, abortion, integration, immigration and such. Your son's essay should address the concept of tolerance only in and of itself avoiding controversial issues. He should however implicitly forestall questions about those issue by asserting that whether or not tolerance is appropriate in any of those cases depends on a rational analysis of the probable consequences following upon tolerance or intolerance of the situations put forth.

For example, if asked if people should tolerate homosexuality, he could reply that that depends on whether or not homosexuality has or does not have negative consequences for society. If then asked for his opinion about what those consequences would be, he could reply that that is outside the scope of his essay. He could say that some people think that those consequences will be negative and that others don't but in any case it is not appropriate for the teacher to interrogate him about his personal opinions. The issue is tolerance not his opinions.

If in fact the teacher is using the issue of tolerance to propagandize your son and his classmates with the liberal positions on those controversial issues (which is probably the case), your son should reply that his mother would rather that he not respond and that she would appreciate a private conversation with the teacher about those issues. If she agrees to meet you, then you can let her know that you object to having your son interrogated publically in the classroom about such sensitive issues and that you find such behavor on her part inappropriate.

If the teacher disagrees with you, ask her to join you in the principals office where the three of you can discuss the problem. If she declines, see the principal youself. If he takes the teacher's side...consider homeschooling.

I hope that helps.

He's going to start it off with the quote that one of the members here uses about Tolerance being how far a machine can deviate from the norm before it screws up the entire machine.

This is a very good start. He should continue on the theme: tolerance as pathology, or tolerance, the philosophy of self destruction by voluntarily imbibing poison.

My son wrote a similar paper a couple of years ago. When I see him tonight I'll ask if he still has notes & sources left.

"Tolerance" is a sign of decadence.

Thank you all for your great suggestions. Unfortunately, they made him write it in class, where he had no time to gather notes, do any research etc., AND they made them write it based on some bogus "movie" they had to watch, which my son called a "bash Whitey" movie. He did the best with what he could. It's such BS - they basically force them to write it in a "certain" way. Thankfully, this is his last year of school and he is racially aware, so they can give it their best shot, they've already "lost him" :box: :cheers:

So this was a senior high school class. Isn't it amazing that the school is allowed to waste valuable time on crap like this while in other countries students learn useful information? In a way I guess it is useful because he will have to write the same crap in his useless college courses.

My brother was actually taken out of a class because he asked too many questions about the "holocaust".

He basically made the teacher look stupid in front of the whole class when he was questioning the holocaust. The next day he was pulled into the principal's office and told "we need to get you out of this class". Oh BTW the teacher was a jew and hated my brother especially when my brother left a copy of "did the 6 million really die" on his desk after class...hahah

Don't even bother in highschool....I would say its much easier to make a difference in college but then I don't recommend sending your son to college either.

Well he had to do his best. The scary thing is how they have control over him during classtime.