I got to hear NG speak during one of his trips to America. At first I got very angry and thought how dare he tell us in America what we have to do and how we have failed. Then I got to thinking about it. Yes, we have failed in that we have not even a Nationalist party in place working to get WN elected to local seats and gaining power within our country to change things.

NG doesn't understand that America's biggest problem is the jew. It is the jew that has opened the border to flood this country with the Mexican cheap labor. In Britain it is the muslims.

I think his thought is to push the Muslim issue so as to gain seats. Much like we American WN would push the Mexican invasion and closing the borders to win seats.

Let us see how they do in the next election in May and how many seats they gain. They should be gaining seats. Until then, let's support the BNP in there attempt to get WN elected. The BNP is not soft on jews, but is a political power that is pushing the issues that will help them get elected so they can start the process of saving Britain for the British people.

My Australian friend, please do a study how many members of your government are jews. The lower echelons especially. Then find out who owns the media outlets. How many judges are jews. Attorneys? Present the names here. If you do not want to do the researching, just post the names of people in power, we will all do the research.
I am sure you will find that there are more than 50% of the important positions in public life in Australia, taken by jews.
Please take notice that arabs, muslims, negroes and other non Whites cause trouble by virtue of what they are. Jews, on the other hand act in full conscience. They plan and work in accord.

The reason why I posted this thread in the General Discussion section is that threads appear to last longer here, and this is a complex and detailed topic that does need a lot of research for you to get an accurate picture of Australia. The world is a very large place, and you can discover quite a lot of it with the world wide web.

The Just In section carries a similar thread:

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=31252

I have started to address the issue of the amount of jewish influence on Australian media at that location also.

My guess is that jewish influence will not reach 10% of positions of power and influence. I would be very surprised if it is anywhere near as high as that.

On the other thread I calculated that donations from jewish companies to the Australian Federal Government coalition parties was only 1.3% of total donations.

I know that of the 150 Federal House of Representatives members, there have only ever been a handful of jewish members, and there may be only one or two now. There are not many more in the Australian Senate.

There are also State Parliaments for the States of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania - only 6 States, and also The Northern Territory and Australian Capital Territory have their own governments. Four of the States also have upper houses of their State Parliaments. That is a lot of elected members for a national population of just over 20 million, but I am guessing that only a small percentage of politicians claim to be jewish, and not much more than the natonal jewish population of just over 1%.

You will find some jews in the corporate world, mainly concentrated in Sydney and Melbourne. The amount of influence jews in business can have on the lives of citizens would be limited.

There is the High Court of Australia, and each State has its own court system. I know of a couple of former and present judges that are jewish, but not a great number.

There are of course an enormous number of solicitors and barristers, and the legal profession certainly has jewish members, but their influence on law making is limited.

As for the media, there are three national commercial television networks (7, 9 and 10), and two national government broadcasters (ABC and SBS). There are of course numerous radio stations, and each State capital has about two newspapers.

You won't get anywere near 50%, and I would be surprised if you can find 5% jews.

Australia is a different place to the USA, and the jewish population and influence is much less.

We also have insignificant numbers of negros, and only about 1 or 2% native black aboriginals, and they have very little influence.

You can also do a census search and discover which places the population chooses to name as country of origin. The lebanese muslims are becoming a problem.

If you want to do the research and discover this for yourself, then please feel free to do so.

If you decide that Australia looks like a better place than the USA, then feel free to join the other people from the USA that have chosen to call Australia home.

Really? What is Islam if it's not a religion then? Where does this country of Islam exist? What do muslims look like? Arabs? Pakistani? Indonesian?

Yup, Islam is a religion, and it is one that I don't mind being practised in White-Majority countries as long as only white people are in the mosques and the mosques are operating in accordance with the law, created and enforced by a white government.

When I was referring to Muslims, I was referring to the non-White ones, normally from somewhere other than the U.K.

Saying Islam is the problem is like saying:
"If these non-White, Third-World invaders would just eat some pork, we would get along just fine."

I don't care if non-White, Third-World invaders have IQs of 160 and smell like freshly baked bread. They have no place in Majority-White Nations.

That's right. It's a factor but not the critical issue, except, if you accept that the Jew tribe is held together by their socalled religion. So there is a mix of factors. On our side, race holds our White interests together not religon.

I agree with you here completely.

But look, it's as simple as this. You can't repatriate 12 million illegal non-White alien invaders from the USA with 6 million Jews infesting the government, the courts, the media editorial rooms, and so forth. They use these alien hordes as a "human shield" to protect and disorient Aryans from teaming up against Jews. It's a simple as that. You have to ignore the hostage and take out the terrorist. The non-Whites, the Muslims-- they're pawns of the Jew. Go for the queen not the pawn.

I understand that these Third-World invaders do the work of the Jew. But in terms of numbers, the White-Nationalist movement in the U.S., probably couldn't close down a Jewish deli, let alone expunge Jews from positions of power and influence in our American government.

The non-Whites, the Muslims-- they're pawns of the Jew. Go for the queen not the pawn.

I've only played chess a handful of times in my life. I have never taken the queen with the first move. Normally it's some lowly pawn, or an overachieving knight. Knights, pawns, rooks and bishops usually fall before the queen does.
It may be possible to checkmate the king while leaving the queen on the board. No matter how the game is played, the strategy is to weaken the units
surrounding and protecting the king, then, when the king is vulnerable, usually when his forces are in tatters, you topple him.

Let's pretend we establish an organization to remove Hispanics from the U.S.
We call it the "American Patriots' Party". Our goal is to repatriate Hispanics
back to their countries where their heritage originated from. We state that we are willing to accomplish our goals through any means necessary, using politics and people power at first, violence if absolutely necessary. It may take 10 years to accomplish our goals.

What do we get if we accomplish our goals?
We get an America that is more majority- native, and less foreign-born.
We get a White populace that takes less crap from destructive minorities and other traitors to America.
We get a White populace that has higher standards for it’s' citizens other than
having a pulse and a propensity to break our laws.
We, hopefully, get a more racially conscious White populace.
We get an organization that has a success under its belt.
We get an organization with political, security, and media apparatuses that are competent, seasoned, and professional.

If we are successful, we have this great organization with nothing to do. We've already taken a rook and a handful of pawns, lets then go after a bishop, or a knight and some more pawns.

In time, the king will fall.

If we continue on our present course here in the U.S., we will get more of the same. The same people on internet forums, calling each other fucktards
with the occasional outburst from a group of gentleman wearing Nazi uniforms.

In conclusion, I want change.

But look, it's as simple as this. You can't repatriate 12 million illegal non-White alien invaders from the USA with 6 million Jews infesting the government, the courts, the media editorial rooms, and so forth. They use these alien hordes as a "human shield" to protect and disorient Aryans from teaming up against Jews. It's a simple as that. You have to ignore the hostage and take out the terrorist. The non-Whites, the Muslims-- they're pawns of the Jew. Go for the queen not the pawn.

If you were a doctor and someone with cancer came to you with a wound that was causing blood loss, would you ignore the bleeding and only treat the longterm deadly cancer? The muslims and the Mexicans are the wound and the jews are the cancer. We must treat both conditions at the same time; cannot afford to ignore the wound.

Or, to change the terms of your metaphor a bit, the muslims and the Mexicans are not hostages but weapons and the terrorist is not a single agent but rather a group of agents with the reproductive capacity to replace themselves over time.

We must relieve them of their weapons and remove them permanently from our land. We cannot ignore the weapons and focus solely on the terrorists. We can and must take away the weapons and rid ourselves of the terrorists simultaneously.

I believe that WNs are capable of chewing gum and walking at the same time.

If we aren't, then we are in trouble.

David Duke

Is not a scholar. Moreover, there's no proof for his conjectures with regard to Europe.

Is not a scholar. Moreover, there's no proof for his conjectures with regard to Europe.

Why aren't you banned?

The Netherlands has only 0,3% of the population jewish, yet they control politics and media.

yet they control politics and media

I can admit that in the US, but until I see some McDonald-esque research with regards to Europe, I am extremely skeptical. The type of sophomoric and simplistic thinking that somehow "dealing with the jews" will solve every other ill is childish.

In the process of trying to prove us wrong, aussieboy will figure it out.
He appears to be an extremely intelligent and well-thought-out White.
And he is on the road to discovering the connection himself.
Keep looking, aussieboy.
You're on the right track.
In the meantime, you have yet to prove us wrong.

The type of sophomoric and simplistic thinking that somehow "dealing with the jews" will solve every other ill is childish.

I think this statement shows how fucking stupid you are because saying something like this means you are not against the jew and your small mind can only comprehend simple differences like race.

I think this statement shows how fucking stupid you are because saying something like this means you are not against the jew and your small mind can only comprehend simple differences like race.

You have a small minded view of white women, which makes you fucking stupid, also. People in glass houses and all that.

aussieboy, methinks you're a one trick pony.

Nick Griffin has written himself out of white nationalism, he is an utter embarrassment, and the real white nationalists in Great Britain want nothing to do with him.

Nick Griffin is nothing but a fuckin pansey]

I saw this plastered all over SF, with alot of WN sheeple drooling over Griffin's statements. I can understand his comments on NOT siding with Islam, but why does he attack enyone who wants to name the jew? In fact, it almost appears as if he is defending the goddamn kikes.

Here is some GREAT commentary on ol' Nickey:

http://www.national-socialism.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18

Democracy is Death
by Colin Jordan

In the Britain of today, a country in extremis under democracy with the death bell tolling, we now encounter the incongruity of the very force which presents itself as the one and only remedy for the evils emanating from the present system fondly embracing that very system. This woeful contradiction is comparable to a doctor advocating for a patient writhing in agony of persistent poisoning a regular dose of yet more of the same poison. We have this in the form of the [color="Red"]British National Party, as doctored by its present leader and his disciples of ruinous compromise, feverishly and frantically declaring its devotion to the democratic system and its desire to become what they call 'mainstream' in their attachment to it, and to this dismal end denouncing Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany, abandoning the cause of restoring a wholly white Britain, accepting Coloureds and Jews and race-mixing whites as not only members but election candidates. This emphatically is not correcting or curing the system but compromising into conformity with it.

The Griffin approach of accepting and adopting the system of democracy, seeking to work within it to make some repairs to it, and thereby becoming part of it and contributing to its survival is absurdly self-nullifying, made that much more absurd by the extent to whicht eh practitioners congratulate themselves on their cleverness in so performing. This is myopic muddleheadedness not cleverness because all the features and defects of the democratic system are correlated in a malaise of society as a whole, a totality of corruption and decay which we have to perceive and confront and cope with in its entirety. to acclaim democracy, as though good on the whole and simply needing some bits and pieces of repair when conforming to it is to display a fatal failure of insight and resovle in wastage of our last opportunity at the eleventh hour to save our race and our nation.

What is needed is nothing less than complete rejection and outright rebellion. If we are at this late and crucial point to stand any chance at all of averting the disastrous consequences of democracy, its culmination in the virtual death of our race and nation, then instead of seeking to become, as do the Griffinites of the BNP, good, 'respectable' democrats, we have have to regain the fighting spirit of our early ancestors and take to fighting the mortal menace of multiracial democracy with the fury of the Viking berserkers.

The Griffinites, in working to change the former BNP of racial nationalism into a mainstrema body of multiracial democracy, do so in the belief that their contortions will surely enable them to gain support from the public sufficiently to win sufficient elections to gain such numbers in Parliament that they gain the power of the state and form a govenrment of the country. This motivating theory is fallacious for two very definite and irrefutable reasons which make the whole venture in the long run a terrible waste of time and hope and work and money. Firstly, the percentage of Coloured electors in the majority of electoral constituencies is so rapidly increasing as to outpace the BNP's ability to increase its votes to the winning point.

I think this statement shows how fucking stupid you are because saying something like this means you are not against the jew and your small mind can only comprehend simple differences like race.

It takes more brainpower to think three dimensionally than file everything under "jew", you dunce.

Besides, at least I can get laid without having to resort to a prostitute.