True. BTW, do you own a gun, or even a sword?

I own several pens, and I am pretty mean with a keyboard.

Why? Do you think I might need to battle ninjas?

You can't carry a blade longer than about 5 centimetres in a public place under State laws. These cannot be sold to people under the age of 16 years.

We don't have a constitutional right to bear arms, and semi-automatic rifles are definitely not legal.

The rules and regulations of buying, keeping, and carrying a handgun make it impractical unless you are a professional licensed security guard, although sporting shooters make the effort.

The locality where I live doesn't pose any special threats to my safety, and I am confident enough of our national defence forces to protect from any invaders.

The easiest weapon you could legally obtain and carry is an aluminium "mag-lite" containing 6 C-cell batteries, if your thought your limbs were not enough fighting and defensive equipment.

Why is that?

http://judicial-inc.biz/port_arthur_massacre.htm

I can't help but notice you arrived on this board an unsophisticated, truculent, teenager type "battling lebs at cronulla beach", but now you've segwayed adroitly into international politics, viz., shifting the focus from jews to muslims.

I'm just glad jews don't engage in terrorism or meddle in Australia's immigration and domestic policy. Because they sure do in tiny, neighboring New Zealand.

I remember that link concerning Port Arthur, and not just because of the grating music. It contains a number of factual flaws, and is presented to create a conspiracy theory about that event. The events of Port Arthur did lead to the famous federal government "gun buy-back" of semi-automatic weapons, however the views about the events of Port Arthur presented on that site are more of a creative work by the writer, than a factual account.

Your first impressions of me during the Cronulla Beach uprising against lebanese muslims were probably coloured by the media reporting which focused on the aggressive actions of young men who had had a few beers in the middle of the day. Most of us at the 5,000 strong protest were quite sober, and didn't get into too much strife. We were ordinary young Australians, protesting about the real problem of lebanese muslims.

Apart from these local issues, I have followed the major international elections over the past few years on the internet, which is a rich source of information. I know all about "swinging chads" and "chad eating democrats" and this sort of detail is most interesting. If you are from the US, I guess you know what that is all about.

Yes, I know about the mossad agents who thought they could take advantage of the NZ government to get false passports. I don't mean to offend you if your have links with New Zealand, but I don't think anyone has much respect for the left-wing NZ government, led by a woman whose voice is even more offensive than her appearance.

True. BTW, do you own a gun, or even a sword?

It is my personal belief that everyone should own, and know how to use both a gun and a sword.

You can't carry a blade longer than about 5 centimetres in a public place under State laws. These cannot be sold to people under the age of 16 years.

So, does that mean that you can own a sword, you just have to keep it at home?

We don't have a constitutional right to bear arms, and semi-automatic rifles are definitely not legal.

Can you legally own the parts to a semi-automatic rifle?

It is my personal belief that everyone should own, and know how to use both a gun and a sword.

So, does that mean that you can own a sword, you just have to keep it at home?

Can you legally own the parts to a semi-automatic rifle?

Yes, you can collect and keep ornamental swords at home, but cannot carry them with you in New South Wales. Crocodile Dundee was just a fictional character from the Northern Territory in the 1980's.

You cannot own a semi-automatic rifle. You were meant to hand them all in, and receive a generous cheque for any that you had. Perhaps you could keep one of the parts, but I don't know where you would get it from these days.

Some people protested loudly about these laws, pointing out that golf clubs can be used as lethal weapons, and that children going fishing need to carry knives.

Perhaps the ban on knives should only have been for the members of ethnic youth gangs (muslims, not jews) , and the ban on semi-automatic weapons should only have been for the psychiatricly disturbed, like mass murderer Martin Bryant, who shared his bed with his pet pig. There are dangerous people in every society, and governments sometimes don't mind inconveniencing many to stop these few.

Doppelhaken: I really don't want to know much more about Martin Bryant and his crimes in Port Arthur, Tasmania, but if you want to accept the fictional account of one web author, you should ask yourself how much other supporting evidence you can find on the net for this one "story". What is the "Vietnam redirection"?

Yes, you can collect and keep ornamental swords at home, but cannot carry them with you. Crocodile Dundee was just a fictional character from the 1980's.

You cannot own a semi-automatic rifle. You were meant to hand them all in, and receive a generous cheque for any that you had. Perhaps you could keep one of the parts, but I don't know where you would get it from these days.

Some people protested loudly about these laws, pointing out that golf clubs can be used as lethal weapons, and that children going fishing need to carry knives.

Perhaps the ban on knives should only have been for the members of ethnic youth gangs (muslims, not jews) , and the ban on semi-automatic weapons should only have been for the psychiatricly disturbed, like mass murderer Martin Bryant, who shared his bed with his pet pig. There are dangerous people in every society, and governments sometimes don't mind inconveniencing many to stop these few.

Yeah, I know Crocodile Dundee was a fictional character. Also, in the movies he carried a knife, not a sword.

Well, I'm glad that I don't live in Australia. There is no way I would give up my weapons, regardless of what laws some pompous government officials got passed. At the very least, I would have my weapons hidden very well. No amount of evil government money would be enough for me to give up my ability to defend myself, family, friends, and home.

Also, I'm sure that the criminals in your country still have their guns. Maybe if someone is lucky, they will be able to beat an armed robber down with a golf club, before the robber can get a shot off.

I think its worthwhile to have a political party wing of our movement, but I wouldn't have too much hope in it winning. Remember the Jews owns the media, they run the civil service and so on. Oh yeah, and they tally the votes.

Of course muslims are a huge problem, and once pro-whites take power all new immigration of them will be stopped, and the others deported. But right now we don't even need to educate whites to make them anti-immigration. I would estimate over 90% of whites to be against non-white immigration. The conservative folks don't want these troublemaking, and culture changing newcomers. And labour whites(as opposed to radical leftists), don't want more people to harm the environment where they live, and especially they don't want millions of unemployed third worlders bringing down wages.

None taken. So, because NZ is headed by a "left-wing" hag, jews don't contaminate milk or get cartoonists fired in OZ/NZ?

I haven't heard about those two stories, perhaps because wait for it..... it may have happened in another country.

I care as much about what happens in NZ as you care about what happens in Cuba.

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1904857,00.html

Sydney bomb plotter charged
26/03/2006 08:06 - (SA)

Sydney - An Australian woman charged at the weekend with plotting to bomb Sydney was a convert to Islam who planned the attack at the behest of a jailed murderer angered over anti-Muslim race riots here late last year, newspapers reported on Sunday.

Jill Courtney, 26, was arrested at her suburban Sydney home on Friday in a swoop by federal and local police operating under anti-terrorism laws.

She was charged with conspiracy to murder and conspiracy to cause explosives to be placed in or near a public place.

The court granted a request by Courtney's lawyer that the woman be assessed by a psychiatrist.

Police were not required to detail the allegations against Courtney during a brief court hearing on Saturday, but Sunday newspapers quoted police sources saying they believed she was acting out of love for a jailed murderer, Hassan Kalache.

Kalache, 28, is serving a 22-year sentence for killing a rival drug dealer in 2002 and allegedly told Courtney he was angry over race riots in Sydney last December and that he would marry her if she carried out a retaliatory bombing, The Sunday Telegraph reported.

A police detective told the Sun Herald newspaper Courtney converted to Islam after becoming "besotted" with Kalache. "It's a pretty sad case, she's a bit of a candle in the wind," he was quoted as saying.

Courtney was due to appear in court again on Monday.

Last year's riots began when a white mob shouting racist chants assaulted people of Middle Eastern appearance in the blue collar beachside suburb of Cronulla.

The riot prompted a wave of retaliatory attacks, mainly by ethnic-Lebanese men, in which churches, shops and cars were trashed.

Australia, a close ally of the United States in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, has been singled out for attack by groups linked to the Al-Qaeda terror network.

Police arrested 18 Muslim men in Sydney and Melbourne last November for allegedly planning a major terrorist bombing.

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1904857,00.html

The idea is NOT to stand our candidates in seats where the BNP are already standing. But over the years it has become blatantly obvious that if a nationalist organization puts up a candidate, the BNP will rush one in at the last minute and split the vote.

Also it is worth mentioning that Nick Griffin and his sycophants have systematically expelled and proscribed many of Britain&#8217]

Following the situation you have described through to the end paints a very bleak future for the WN cause in Britain.

It is a very counterproductive action to split the movement up into splinters, which is how you are describing the actions of the BNP.

It is far better to keep all viewpoints within the one party, to prevent the electoral suicide of vote splitting in your "first past the post" system.

It appears that people from the BPP either chose to leave the BNP due to policy changes, as the BNP moved towards electoral success, or the BPP people were removed from the BNP because of the perceived unelectability of the BNP if it included those people holding the former BNP views. Which was it?

I can't measure the strength of the BPP from this far away, because you actually have to see the level of local media coverage, the attendance at meetings, and actual voting figures, and you can't pick this from a website which could be the work of a small group of people.

If the BPP has the capacity to campaign and win significant votes, then it is in the interest of the cause for you to work together with the BNP, avoiding campaigning against each other. If however this splinter group is not effective enough to cause a split of the vote, then it can be safely ignored.

The long term outlook for the WN cause in Britain may follow Pauline Hansons' One Nation from Australia, where the party achieved 23% of the Statewide vote in 1998 in Queensland, won 11 out of less than 100 State parliamentary seats under the optional preferential voting system. Then by 2002 it had disappeared because the major party coalition of the right adopted some One Nation policies, and won over these One Nation voters, who have remained with the Government ever since.

While the voters moved to a major right-wing party, many One Nation party members did not, and remain as politically inactive members of the public.

The remaining One Nation policies such as tighter immigration restrictions remain largely ignored, however not one political party leader these days publicly praises multiculturalism. These problems remain unsolved, as shown by the December 2005 Cronulla Sydney uprising, and are the potential seeds of a new Australian WN party.

On top of the world.

 

It would be interesting to hear a Canadian perspective

Trudeau is the #1 culprit

1)What sort of electoral system do you have, 2)and do WN parties contest elections?

1: same as in Britain with minor differences
2: never heard of any

Has there been a backlash in recent times to the immigration policies of last century, which we saw on television as the "Degrassi" years?

No public figure has opposed the browning of Canada. As for the average whites it's hard to say but judging from my conversations my guess is that they don't like it but wouldn't admit it in public.

Which ethnic groups are causing the most problems?

though Montreal is rather safe compared to Toronto I'd say it's mainly niggers from Haiti and sometimes arabs.

Where do the French speakers fit into this? Are they either white or nationalists?

The so-called nationalists are sort of linguistic supremacists and they are anti-racists, they think (this is not a public posture as far as I can tell from my discussions) any biped can become one of them as long as it speaks french. Think of white christians who embrace niggers as long as they believe in The Lord and you'll have a pretty good idea of what they are, a bunch of fools. You can't count on them for furthering any kind of genuine nationalism let alone white nationalism.

David Duke may have a correct assessment of the situation in the USA, but the world is bigger than that.

Blaming jews for the mess one lives in makes sense if you're an american but it doesn't work if you live in Holland or France and perhaps Britain and from your perspective Australia too, that's what american WNs don't seem to understand.

Jean-Marie Le Pen isn't a WN he's a oldschool conservative and his party is a 'big tent' organisation and not a rigid doctrinaire movement but they all agree about immigration and foreigners living in France. 20 years after the creation of the Front National they got almost 20 % of the vote and thanks to the ragheads' riots in Paris the FN might get 30+ % of the vote in the next presidential election and maybe get their breakthrough in the National Assembly. Had Le Pen and the others had spent all of those years attacking jews his party wouldn't be where it is right now. The jewish lobby though it has a significant power hasn't turned the French government into a bully boy for Israel and there are still a lot of overtly goyim communists involved in politics and they constitute along with the limousine liberals the core of that country's anti-white, anti-nationalist movements and institutions. The situation is different than in America.

Why would the FN target jews ? They're not going to get more popular by doing that, it's not jews who are burning their cars and raping women it's those brazen, ugly and violent mahgrebins and africans, and as more and more frenchmen see their cars torched and their neighborhood defaced by these savages they will vote for and contribute to the FN because they'll have seen or experienced what 'tolerance' and 'diversity' really means. If jews haven't played a role in the immigration policies of France then there's no point attacking them and trying to establish a link between them and the savages in the mind of the french public, especially in light of the fact that the scum occasionally express their antisemitism; if they did but the public isn't aware of it it would counter-productive to make attacking them a priority because they're not a visible threat and therefore the party's target audience won't respond positively. That's what Griffin is basically saying and he's right. That same concern can be applied to most white countries.

The liberal elite of France is afraid of the FN, like the liberal elite of Britain is afraid of the BNP. They're all afraid of genuine nationalism. We should act as pragmatic activists not idealistic ones: obtaining concrete results should be the objective of WNs everywhere not dreaming of a worldwide White revolution.

====================

The Netherlands has only 0,3% of the population jewish, yet they control politics and media.

has this been discussed here or on another forum ? I'd like to see some evidence

VLC,

i wanted to add another point you left out.

Even more problematic is the fact that there is no genuine anti-semitism among the european peoples.For a political party,adressing the "jewish problem" is in the best of all cases pointless.A waste of time and a waste of breath.

Most of the antisemites in Germany are muslims.Not exactly the voters of such a party.

For the Germans expressing "anti-semitic" thoughts,the situation in Israel (and how the Israelis treat the "poor" Palestenians) and the money we send years over years to Israel as reparations to the holocaust,are the main issues leading to this "anti-semitism".

Refusing to name the jew in order to gain electoral credibility is like a virgin becoming a prostitute to get the money to buy a chastity belt.

A tad counter-productive.

First let me say that I agree, in contrast with too many here on VNNF, that the muslims in Europe and Australia are a serious problem and that they should all be expelled immediately except maybe for the Bosnians. The Bosnians are no more real muslims than Unitarians are real christians.

But if you think for a minute that you don't have a jewish problem, let me ask you some questions.

Why is that 99% of the people in your countries still believe the hollow-hoax lie?

Why is that when you try to tell people the truth they don't just consider you wrong, they think that you are evil or crazy?

Why is it against the law in many European countries (and Australia?) to make any comment that in any way questions or diminishes the hollow-hoax?

Why is that Germar Rudolph, Ernst Zundel, David Irving and thousands of other people have been jailed for questioning the hollow-hoax lie?

Why is that your governments have given many billions of dollars (money) to Israel?

Why have they given free military equipment to Israel?

Why did the French and the British help the Israelis get nuclear bombs?

Why does the UN do nothing about Israel's nuclear weapons while threatening Iran for trying, not having, to get them?

Why was Israel not sanctioned for bombing Iraq's nuclear-powered, electrical plant in 1981?

Why are the British and other Europeans fighting a war in Iraq that is against their own interests and serves only the interest of Israel?

Why are the Israelis not brought to justice for slaughtering thousands of Palestinians while Serbian leaders have been and are being hunted down, tried and punished (poisoned and suicided?) for defending their nation from muslim aggression?

Why has there been a nearly iron-clad taboo against discussing The Jewish Question in polite society since WWII when it was commonly and openly written about and talked about before the war? (Read the literature of the 1930s.)

Why, why, why and more whys?

How much power would a group have to have to maintain the kind of control over politics, the economy, education, the telling of history, all forms of media and general social discourse needed to maintain belief in the hollow-hoax lie and to hustle the financial and military assistance that enable Israel to survive?

Would not a reasonable man consider a group with that much power over their nation to be a problem?

Does not their threatened "Clash of Civilizations" war which will surely engulf the world in misery and chaos and be the ruin of the White Nations, set off some kind of alarm bell in your heads?

Who might that group be?

Rhymes with screw and you as in...screw you.

Time to get unscrewed.

The human body contains billions of cells but it only takes a few invading virus particles to disrupt the body's bio-chemical defenses and bring on death.

The white race is dying.

There is a virus infecting it.

If the suvival of the white race is a matter of concern to you, then the virus must be expelled from the body of the white race.

The muslim nations are not a problem but the muslims WITHIN the white nations are.

The jews are a problem.

Two problems...both serious...both requiring immediate and persistent attention.

Those outside of America need to see that the jews are not just an American problem. They are your problem too.

VNNFers need to see that the muslims are as serious a problem for Europeans and Australians as Mexicans and blacks are here in America.

Tell the truth and let the chips fall where they may.

We are all white people. We cannot let the jews divide us like this.

Burrhus,

actually the questions are pretty simple.

If you leave out the "jewish thing" almost every German agrees with our socio-political standpoint.

They openly admit that we are right,but they also say that we are too fanatic and radical and fear that we might cause another world war.

Thats why they seek for easy solutions: for example voting for some paleo-conservative with a more firm stand against illegal-immigration,or for a more left-wing social democrat who is more willing to protect the rights of the working class etc.

The holocaust is a non-issue for the averange German.They know that denying it will result into jail-time but they dont care.They never intend to deny it and as for those who do...well Germany never was a "unconditional free speech" democracy.

The problem is that there is no clear indication for the jewish-involvement in all the "bad"-things caused in Germany today.And trying to prove it is like trying to prove that 911 was a Mossad operation.Many Germans will just look at you as if you were a conspiracy nut.

Burrhus,
The problem is that there is no clear indication for the jewish-involvement in all the "bad"-things caused in Germany today.And trying to prove it is like trying to prove that 911 was a Mossad operation.Many Germans will just look at you as if you were a conspiracy nut.

The purpose in asking the questions was to demonstrate to the Europeans that they have no answers to them if they deny that the jews are a problem.

The truthful answers to the questions are in fact a clear indication of jewish involvement in the problems facing Europe and Australia.