If you are alone, out of view, in your own house, go naked or not - makes no difference to anyone else. BUT, if you seek an audience with me, or anyone else like me, please take care to be courteous and NOT OFFENSIVE in your manners, dress, attitude, and odors.

If you have bad breath, camoflauge it with mouth wash (please)]

Do you mean you don't want to go to your local watering hole and have a beer with these folks:

Why you are just tied up emotionally with profoundly anti-Aryan conventions and a misguided sense of opprobrium.

 

Aryan Lord

As one familiar with Germans, I have to say that nudism changed completely from what the author of that book is implying. Today, nudists are most often, ugly, old and leftist, the young people who do this are scummy hippy or Green trash.

Indeed nudism is still popular in Germany; nowadays you even see these freaks in public parks. From what I hear, it was particularly popular in East Germany under the communists, apparently the people enjoyed that as one of their few freedoms; they even had nudist days at the public swimming pools.

In any case, most of the people who practice nudism today are people that you and I would find extremely defective. Check out this scene on the net a little bit and you will find that there is no way any of these people will ever be our friends.

I find clothes to be part of civilization, and think the majority of whites are not particularly aesthetic in the nude, nudist colonies are not dignified, noble or beautiful sights, they packed with old and ugly people that no one would look at anyway. With that in mind, I really don’t understand what you find so beautiful about group nudity, you must have some kind of idealized notion about what the vast majority of whites look like.

Another thing is that even most wild tribes cover up there private parts, it certainly was not Christianity that made them do that.

I am not an advocate of nudism, but I have been a critic of Puritanism in its many forms. Note that the great antiquarian JJ Bachofen notes in his well known work "Mutterrecht" that the Doric manner of female dress in ancient Greece was more revealing than the Ionian. He associated the Doric with the more ideal Sparta and the Ionian with decadent Athens. I have read others suggest that the Doric manner of dress was more "Aryan" and the Ionian, more "Oriental."

There is a definite difference among Aryans and non-Aryans when it comes to our attitudes towards public exhibition of the female form, whether clothed but revealing-- think of a ballet dancer-- or unclothed, as in the scant bikini. We are generally tolerant of these exhibitions but within identifiable social boundaries.

It's where nudity is used to break down social boundaries and conventions, such as with porn, or, orgies etc, or Jewish feminist "performance artists" like Karen Findley or Annie Sprinkle-- that nudity has been the tool of the Jew to re-engineer society and enslave Whites by manipulation of our passions. Example-- Jewess Annie Sprinkle's "performance art--"

http://archive.salon.com/health/col/vitz/2000/02/08/sprinkle/print.html

Though Christianity has Jewish antecedents, one could argue that the ascetic side of Christianity-- the notion of control of the passions, mortification of the flesh, and ritual and social inculcation of discipline including over sexual passion-- has a stronger antecedent in Persian Zoroastrianism which in general described itself as an "Aryan" religion (though Revilo Oliver speculated to the contrary). Also Julius Evola, regards asceticism as part of the authentic primordial Tradition that is at the root of many different exoteric religious faiths such as Christianity and Islam or Buddhism.

[=Right is Right]Aryan Lord
As one familiar with Germans, I have to say that nudism changed completely from what the author of that book is implying. Today, nudists are most often, ugly, old and leftist, the young people who do this are scummy hippy or Green trash.

Nudists may indeed be a mixed bunch but that should not be taken as either an endorsement nor reason to criticise the said practice.

Indeed nudism is still popular in Germany; nowadays you even see these freaks in public parks. From what I hear, it was particularly popular in East Germany under the communists, apparently the people enjoyed that as one of their few freedoms; they even had nudist days at the public swimming pools.

Nudism is now very much a part of the `mainstream`.Much of what was state practice in the former DDR was of great practical benefit to the Volk.

In any case, most of the people who practice nudism today are people that you and I would find extremely defective. Check out this scene on the net a little bit and you will find that there is no way any of these people will ever be our friends.

I don`t necessarily disagree but that is not how Nacktkultur originated and I repeat my earlier statement that it had[apart from the first year of the regime] the support of the National Socialist state.
We do not have to dislike something just because it is also liked by those who we may not be in ideological accord with.

I find clothes to be part of civilization, and think the majority of whites are not particularly aesthetic in the nude, nudist colonies are not dignified, noble or beautiful sights, they packed with old and ugly people that no one would look at anyway. With that in mind, I really don’t understand what you find so beautiful about group nudity, you must have some kind of idealized notion about what the vast majority of whites look like.

But what do you regard as `civilisation`? Nudity in ancient Sparta[much admired by the Third Reich] was very much a part of what was considered civilisation.
I have no false perceptions about the physical state of the average `white`
but nudism may act as a catalyst for people to improve their bodies via the element of public `shame`.

Another thing is that even most wild tribes cover up there private parts, itcertainly was not Christianity that made them do that.

How can you be sure about that?
Nevertheless it was the pernicious impact of xtianity upon the Germanic peoples that caused individuals to view the naked form as `sinful` and somehow `shameful`. Do you consider this natural?

If you are alone, out of view, in your own house, go naked or not - makes no difference to anyone else. BUT, if you seek an audience with me, or anyone else like me, please take care to be courteous and NOT OFFENSIVE in your manners, dress, attitude, and odors.

If you have bad breath, camoflauge it with mouth wash (please)]

Contumacyman, you appear to have some `issues` regarding your apparent phobia of the natural world with all these suggestions of covering up the naked form as if we were moslems and your dislike of natural female and male odours.
I find it a sign of the times that modern man[invariably young people] have a fetish with perfumes, scented soaps and `grooming`. There is something very effeminate and emasculated in the sight of a man who gells his hair,splashes his face with perfume and obsesses about whether he `stinks`.
How weak and effeminate our Aryan males have become.

http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/

 

Freikorperkultur
http://www.dfk.org/

FKK
http://www.oboena.de/application/index.cfm?CFID=7971194&CFTOKEN=58618810

http://www.fkk-miramare.de/

Nude beaches, resorts and spas
http://www.nudeplaces.com/

The Naturist Society
http://www.naturistsociety.com/

I don't know]In my opinion nudism is a fetish.

I don't know]In my opinion nudism is a fetish.

I would argue that he or she who automatically associates nudism with perversion or eroticism is the one that really has the problem.
You give no evidence to support your statements,merely your own and not very well thought out opinion.

Nudism is now very much a part of the `mainstream`.Much of what was state practice in the former DDR was of great practical benefit to the Volk.

Today, mainstream generally means influenced by the jew.

I don`t necessarily disagree but that is not how Nacktkultur originated and I repeat my earlier statement that it had[apart from the first year of the regime] the support of the National Socialist state.
We do not have to dislike something just because it is also liked by those who we may not be in ideological accord with.

I as a WN, I would feel extremely uncomfortable surrounded by nude leftists.

But what do you regard as `civilisation`? Nudity in ancientSparta[much admired by the Third Reich] was very much a part of what was considered civilisation.

They also appeared not to have much against buggery, although I am skeptical of how much of it went on back then and how acceptable it was. The interesting thing is that ancient Greek art almost never depicted nude women]
Not everything the ancients did was good, for example, they held white slaves and even rival Greeks were enslaved, if I am not mistaken.

I have no false perceptions about the physical state of the average `white`
but nudism may act as a catalyst for people to improve their bodies via the element of public `shame`.

That is probably the key problem with these people, they have no shame.

How can you be sure about that?
Nevertheless it was the pernicious impact of xtianity upon the Germanic peoples that caused individuals to view the naked form as `sinful` and somehow `shameful`. Do you consider this natural?

I am aware that there are some primitive tribes inBorneoandAfricawhere they run around all nude, but in general, most savages I have seen in National Geographic magazine wore at least loin cloths.

I would argue that he or she who automatically associates nudism with perversion or eroticism is the one that really has the problem.

But Aryan Lord

That is akin to the tired old saying that those who hate fags must be suppressed fags themselves.

You give no evidence to support your statements,merely your own and not very well thought out opinion.

In my opinion, nudism is part of the larger problem, that the White race has turned into a bunch of selfish, degenerate, over tolerant and self absorbed hedonists.

[=Right is Right]But Aryan Lord

That is akin to the tired old saying that those who hate fags must be suppressed fags themselves.
In my opinion, nudism is part of the larger problem, that the White race has turned into a bunch of selfish, degenerate, over tolerant and self absorbed hedonists.

Whether the race has turned into all the things that you said it has nothing to with nudism.
You seem to be incapable of progressing from your simple moralistic equation that nudism=degeneracy.

OTE=Right is They also appeared not to have much against buggery, although I am skeptical of how much of it went on back then and how acceptable it was. The interesting thing is that ancient Greek art almost never depicted nude women; to them a woman was apparently something unaesthetic.

How do you define `art`?
There are numerous examples of the naked female form being represented in classical sculpture,especially the goddess Diana/Venus.

Not everything the ancients did was good, for example, they held white slaves and even rival Greeks were enslaved, if I am not mistaken.

A practice that was universal among all Aryan and non-Aryan peoples.
This has nothing to do with the subject we are debating.

That is probably the key problem with these people, they have no shame.

`Shame`? How petit-bourgeois of you!

I am aware that there are some primitive tribes in Borneo and Africa where they run around all nude, but in general, most savages I have seen in National Geographic magazine wore at least loin cloths.

Neither a crticism nor an endorsement of the ancient Aryan practice of nudism.

`Shame`? How petit-bourgeois of you!

LOL, ya busted me, yes, I want the rabble to keep it clean. Shame is a good thing to keep the rabble from desecrating their race]What do you think about the scene in this picture, surely you must find this a little odd, there doesn't seem any health benefits there.

LOL, ya busted me, yes, I want the rabble to keep it clean. Shame is a good thing to keep the rabble from desecrating their race]What do you think about the scene in this picture, surely you must find this a little odd, there doesn't seem any health benefits there.

I am not advocating interracial nudism or that people with sub-standard bodies should disrobe publicly but it could act as a catalyst for causing such types to seek to improve their bodies.
Nudists are a broad church but I would advocate that people try the experience privately first,possibly among understanding or participating relatives and friends.
Maybe one day we can have Aryan only nudist collectives and/or communities run along such lines.

...this thread for The Silliest Thread Ever Award.

I just wasted 5 minutes of my aging life reading the first and last pages.

Someone slap me, please.

I am not advocating interracial nudism or that people with sub-standard bodies should disrobe publicly but it could act as a catalyst for causing such types to seek to improve their bodies.
Nudists are a broad church but I would advocate that people try the experience privately first,possibly among understanding or participating relatives and friends.
Maybe one day we can have Aryan only nudist collectives and/or communities run along such lines.

This does make sence, it maybe can be undertaken in a totally non-sexual manner aswell as a sexual manner. Which goes on quite abit it is mostly middle aged folks though, which you yourself are arn't you AL.