Just imagine what it's like for the poor ones who remain in SA now, especially the children.

The thought has haunted me , since 1990 .

Eventually , with certainty , there will be a massacre of the remaining whites .
It is only a question of when .

Damn fools , they live on the continent of Africa . They knew history , they knew about the Congo , Angola , Mozambique.... always the same ! Yet the typical dumb white refrain ' but our blacks are different '

The claim that SA belongs to Blacks is lucridous. The whole area was sparsely inhabited by bushmen and hottentots at the moment of colonization (17th century). It is true that Bantus have come in the region a few centuries before Whites, but always in demand of fertile lands, they have moved only into the Eastern Savannahs, places that form the modern stronghold. The infertile western parts were colonized by Germans (from Low Countries, Northern Germany) and Protestant Frenchmen. They mixed with indigenes and formed the so-called Coloreds, a culturally White group that forms with Whites an absolute majority in the above-mentioned regions.

Of course these are only ethnographic observations. In practice, land always belongs to the victor. N America is now no more indian than France is Basque. Jewish historians have a tendency to decry "imperialism" and turn land disputes into ethnographic (crooked) and propagandistic discussions. Should the French people return to Gallic after suffering the indignity of speaking the language of the conquerors?

I have no sympathy for these schmucks. They voted themselves into slavery and got what they deserved: destitution, degradation and harassment. Show me one person in his right mind ready to give his belongings based on someone else's "historical rights"!!!

According to the semite bacillus, every non-white right is "historical", while every white right is "racist". Above all, we must be "historical" ourselves and extirpate the parasite once and for all.

An exponentially growing black population and a stagnant white population was going to lead to only one thing sooner or later. A black take over. Either through what happened, or race mixing over time.

Israel is in the same situation with the palestinians. The palestinians breed like rabbits, and their population of the total palestinians in Jordan, Lebanon, Israel and the occupied territories is approaching the Jewish population of Israel.

So the Jews know the moment of truth is coming, where either they will back down, and accept their fate. As the savage population keeps growing exponentially and eclipses their own. Or they deal with the savages ruthlessly eliminating them from the land.

The Jews seem to have chosen the second path, as now Gaza has a blockade on it. And the population is starting to slowly starve to death. Also smashing Lebanon's economy sped up the emigration of the people of Lebanon.

Since the South Africans left the problem so long, by 1990 there was 35 million blacks and 8 million whites. Killing or banishing 35 million people from a large area is not an easy task! Now its 40+million blacks and the white population is itself shrinking as whites flee.

Which Israel was also faced with as net migration to Israel had slowed to a trickle, and was looking like it could start going negative.

I have no sympathy for these schmucks. They voted themselves into slavery and got what they deserved: destitution, degradation and harassment.

The vote was far from unanimous . You will condemn the entire race , because the majority made an error ?

The claim that SA belongs to Blacks is lucridous. The whole area was sparsely inhabited by bushmen and hottentots at the moment of colonization (17th century).

Your error , you're not suppose to know any history, to that degree . Just the simple assumption , 'if it's Africa , it has to be black' . You aren't suppose to know any more than that .

'Thinking slaves are dangerous', that's the reason for public schools .

Of course not. I only condemn WHITE SOUTH AFRICANS who, by the force of majority, decided it is "moral" to hand over power to savage kaffirs. As a side issue, those that voted YES were largely women plugged in to KIKENVERMIN media, thus I also take the occasion and utterly condemn those who gave them a right for vote.

This whole process lies in absolute contradiction with basic principles of free societies. Niggers simply had no right to whites' prosperity (or power), for the obvious reason they had no contribution to that. Whites also had no right to condemn their children to slavery. After all, this is what whites are in SA: slaves sustaining an enormous parasitic black population bound of turning this country into a third world shithole. Those who voted yes should be made DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the present state of White community in SA. They never asked their children if they want to live in a society that values "multiculturalism" (an yiddish term for WHITE SLAVERY) or "tolerance" (another yiddish term for RELINQUISHING WHITE RIGHTS).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The question asked was "Do you support continuation of the reform process which the State President began on February 2, 1990, and which is aimed at a new constitution through negotiation?"

The results, in a turnout of 85.1%, was:
Yes 1,924,186 68,73%
No 875,619 31,27%
Total number of votes: 2,804,947 out of 3,296,800

In Cape Town and Durban over 85% voted "yes" and in Pretoria over 57% voted "yes". Only Pietersburg in the Northern Transvaal, a rural right wing stronghold, voted "no" with 57%. Even in the conservative stronghold, Kroonstad, the "yes" side won with 52%. Next day, President de Klerk said "Today we have closed the book on apartheid" as he celebrated his 56th birthday. Nelson Mandela said that he was "very happy indeed".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

If Mandela was happy, I bet JEWS were even happier. This marks a glorious completion in their reletless campaign of inflitration, poisoning and subversion against ARYAN countries. The fall of this center of resistance meant that ARYANS could no longer consider any country as their safe heaven.

Israel is in the same situation with the palestinians. The palestinians breed like rabbits, and their population of the total palestinians in Jordan, Lebanon, Israel and the occupied territories is approaching the Jewish population of Israel.

So the Jews know the moment of truth is coming, where either they will back down, and accept their fate. As the savage population keeps growing exponentially and eclipses their own. Or they deal with the savages ruthlessly eliminating them from the land.

The Jews seem to have chosen the second path, as now Gaza has a blockade on it. And the population is starting to slowly starve to death. Also smashing Lebanon's economy sped up the emigration of the people of Lebanon.

Which Israel was also faced with as net migration to Israel had slowed to a trickle, and was looking like it could start going negative.

But,as always, they will always have the media's - and so many politicians and businessmen - sympathy,and will always have the freedom to manipulate sympathy,whereas WE never will.

But,as always, they will always have the media's - and so many politicians and businessmen - sympathy,and will always have the freedom to manipulate sympathy,whereas WE never will.

Yes I wanted to show the comparison. Jews are organized and relentlessly fight for Jewish interests(to the point they are universally hated).

Whites need to learn a couple things from them though... one is that you always side with your own kind, even when you have some disagreements with them.