So you want to be president of the United States of America, and a
pro-White on at that?

No problem.

You'll need to be witty, charming, ethical, articulate... I'm kidding you,
we've had plenty of thieves, mumblers and morons in the past, so things
like ethics are really not that high on the agenda, not compared with
things like wealth.

"If I was a rich man!"

The most important men in town would come to fawn on me!
They would ask me to advise them,
Like a Solomon the Wise.
"If you please, Reb Tevye..."
"Pardon me, Reb Tevye..."
Posing problems that would cross a rabbi's eyes!
And it won't make one bit of difference if I answer right or wrong.
When you're rich, they think you really know!

Of course getting hold of money isn't so easy, a disproportionate amount
of political funding is done by the Jewish community, and if you're
running a pro-White ticket they are not going to be rushing to hand their
hard earned shekels over to you.

Of course there are exceptions to the rule, for example the recent Ron
Paul money bombs, during the 2008 primaries, did raise an awful lot of
grassroots money, (although a proportion of the funding did come from
Jewish sources), but even that may not be enough, when you're running a
pro-White ticket.

Remember when you're going into those primaries, if you're pro-White, it's
going to be you against the rest of the field. If you have ten candidates
with $10 million each, and you have $10 million yourself, they only need
to spend $1 million each, attacking you, to be able to match your entire
budget.

It's not easy when it's ten against one!

But, let's think positively, let us assume that you've managed to
circumnavigate the Jewish lobby, and raise your own funds, what next?

When war correspondent and illustrator Frederic Remington telegraphed the
famous newspaper publisher William Randolph Hearst, from Cuba that no war
was imminent, Hearst is said to have telegraphed Remington back with this
message:

“Please remain. You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war.”

Today, the modern day version of Hearst would say, in a message concerning
the presidential race:

"Please remain. You furnish the candidate, I'll get him elected."

There is no greater power in the world today than the power wielded by the
manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or religious leader of
old, no conquering conquistador, or high priest ever held power even
remotely approaching the magnitude of the few dozen men who control
America's mass media of news and entertainment.

What we have today, in effect, is the government decided by the media
moguls, and who owns the media?

I could dedicate page, after page, after page, answering that question,
but fortunately it's already been answered for me:

Who Rules America?

And the answer to the question is that anyone willing to spend a few hours
in a large library looking into current editions of yearbooks on the radio
and television industries and into directories of newspapers and
magazines; into registers of corporations and their officers, and into
standard biographical reference works can verify, with great accuracy,
that there is an unhealthy, and disproportionate Jewish control of the
American mass media, and so if you're running on a pro-White ticket that's
a problem.

I know there are those, at this point, who will point to the "Ron Paul
Revolution", but let's face it, results have already shown us that has
been more hype than substance.

Sure, it's impressive having more Myspace friends than the opposition
candidates, but it's a drop in the ocean, and appeals only to a narrow set
of demographics.

I think a perfect example of the hype being misinterpreted can be found in
the Ron Paul thread, on the Racialist Conservative website Stormfront,
where one member announces, with some degree of glee, that "500,000 people
have now read this thread"

The trouble is, no they haven't.

There has been 500,000 views of the thread, but how many people have
viewed that thread between one hundred and one thousand times?

Let's put things into perspective on this one.

The Stormfront front page says there are 124,476 members on the site, but
the truth is that that is the total number of sign ups.

The Stormfront front page says there are 20,666 active members on the
site, but the truth is that that total is set to include any person who
has logged in at least once over a period of half a year.

What the Stormfront front page doesn't show, but has been admitted by the
Stormfront staff, is that the active membership over an average week, is
around 5,000, and that includes many who are not pro-White, and of those
who are pro-White the bigboard stats (collected from Stormfront's own
board) suggests that less than 50% are American, so that we can
guesstimate that the active, pro-White American membership is somewhere
between 1,000 and 2,500.

Now the question I asked earlier?

There has been 500,000 views of the thread, but how many people have
viewed that thread between one hundred and one thousand times?

The truth is that that thread has probably been read by no more than
around 1,000 people.

This is the internet.

A lot of people get excited when they see someone, or something, given
major prominence on a website, but it's rare that more than a few thousand
people are actually seeing that person, or thing.

That Ron Paul Myspace?

On one of the worlds busiest internet sites, Ron Paul actually only has
100,000 friends, out of an American population of over 300,000,000, so,
like I said, it's a drop in the ocean.

Now compare that with the mainstream media, on the Jay Leno show you
appear in front of an average audience of 2.7 million.

To become president of the united states of America you need to reach
audiences in the millions, not in the hundreds, or low thousands, and the
Jewish controlled mass media is unlikely to give you that level of
exposure, if you're running on a pro-White ticket.

But let's think positively, let's imagine that you've managed to
circumnavigate the Jewish lobby, and raise your own funds, and that you've
been able to by-pass the Jewish control of the American mass media, and
reach the population of the Nation, then what?

Live Free, or Diebold!

Voting fraud was contested and proven in a US court in 2003, concerning
the 2000 election. It's not the first time, and it won't be the last.

The trouble with the Diebold machines is that they are very easy to rig,
and there is no solid paper trail back up of people's votes.

Therefore it is possible to by-pass the electorate, and to pre-determine
the result of the elections, by rigging machines.

Not only is it possible, but it's already occurred and, as mentioned
above, it's been proven in a US court that it's already occurred.

So who controls DESI (Diebold Election Systems, Inc.)?

Well here's a little something that people might not know, DESI, is on of
the top four providers of voting companies used in America, and one of the
other three is ES&S (Election Systems & Software), and ES&S's
Vice-President is Russian Jew Todd Urosevich, who just happens to be the
brother of DESI's former CEO Bob Urosevich, who created the original
software architecture for Diebold Election Systems, meaning that the
software used by the machines that collate 90% of the votes in America,
was written by, and is controlled by two Jews.

Furthermore, a vice president of ES&S, Tom Eschberger, was entangled in a
bribery prosecution regarding voting machines - he took an immunity plea
and a Georgia official went to jail.

So, where does this leave us?

Ah, that's right, so you want to be the President of the United States of
America?

Well, if you can get past the Jewish money men, if you can circumnavigate
the Jewish controlled media, and if you can by-pass the Jewish manipulated
voting system, I suppose you stand as good a chance as anyone.

So what's the point I'm getting at here?

Well the thing is, if the system is rigged, what is the point of us being
engaged in the process?

I mean, if you're standing on a street corner, watching a game of three
card monte, and you can see that the game is rigged, are you going to
stake your twenty on a card, knowing you will lose every time?

Obviously, if you have an ounce of commonsense, you won't.

We have to treat politics in the same way.

There is no point handing over all our hard earned money to a politician
that doesn't represent us, and who will not win, that's just stupid
behavior, what we have to do instead is use the politicians for our own
ends.

We don't need to spend week, after week, after week, cheerleading them
amongst our own people, we need to go amongst their people, and cheerlead
our own cause, we need to reach out to their people, and bring them to us,
not direct our people to them.

The way to measure if we are being effective in this capacity?

How much are you reading about 'their' candidate, through our sources, and
how much are you hearing about our beliefs, amongst their candidates
supporters?

Sadly to many people have got things the wrong way around in 2008, they
are cheerleading the wrong side, they are spending to much of their time
telling our people about their candidate, rather then telling that
candidates supporters about our cause.

There is no pro-White candidate in the 2008 Presidential race, there is
not even a candidate that is close. Some people have spent far to long
trying to convince people otherwise, and one of the ways they have sought
to do this is by suggesting that various people are talking in code words.

Let me tell you about code words, code words is a code word for one of two
things, it's either a code word for cowardice, or a code word for your
ignorance.

You see if the candidate is saying he's not pro-White, he is either to
afraid to stand by his beliefs, or he actually means it when he says he
isn't pro-White, it's either cowardice, or you're just seeing what you
want to see, rather than the truth.

There are no code words, there is no conspiracy, what you have is a dose
of wishful thinking, so save your money for pro-White causes, and instead
of cheerleading someone on the back of supposition, get out amongst the
people, and start using this opportunity to educate them.

The system is rigged, we're not going to win at the polling booth, and
because of that the downside to the American electoral political system is
that every four years many of our people become sidetracked, supporting
our decline, instead of our rise, wasting their money on pointless
political gambles, but the up side is that every four years the political
electoral system forces a bunch of politicians to make promises, and based
on those promises we see people with various views congregate together,
and that allows us to know where to go to reach those sympathetic to our
cause, but who are not yet awakened.

For all those pre-occupied with a particular candidate, stop trying to
sell a dud to your own people, and go awaken those people instead!

Francis Playfair