It would impractical and costly to try to contain the jew in israel. And all of the neighboring countries hate them rightfully so, as it was wrong to steal their land and create israel as a sovereign country in the first place.

There are many people here, at VNN, who are very concerned with the environment and in consideration for their sensibilities, I offer-up “two-fer“; I propose that we shoot all jews in the back of the head and use their filthy corpses to fill-in the strip mines in West Virginia and Pennsylvania.

New Guinea would be a good place for the JEW(s).
In addition to being an extraordinarily
Kosher diet for the cannibalistic natives

The first step that would have to have been taken as a precursor to the WN ascendancy would be the total destruction of Israel's nuclear arsenal.

Without their nukes or any aid from us they would probably quickly disappear as well.

I take some issues with questions like this. It seems sometimes that there is a certain response that is intended and wanted. The one that reflects bad on us.

I'm sorry, burrhus if that was not your intent. And it probably isn't. but I just felt the need to say it.

Death to jews. A final solution. Banish them and they'll just come back to swindle your grandchildren like they have over and over throughout history.
If some are too squeamish for this then leave the 'dirty work' to those of us
who aren't. People who don't approve of this need some 'clockwork orange'
style 're-education' anyways.

brutus has the best idea.

As for sending them to Palestine. To actively brutalize the Palestinian people with more Jews would be a cowardly and unworthy act, just as it was in 1948.

Enkidu

Without their nukes or any aid from us they would probably quickly disappear as well.

I take some issues with questions like this. It seems sometimes that there is a certain response that is intended and wanted. The one that reflects bad on us.

I'm sorry, burrhus if that was not your intent. And it probably isn't. but I just felt the need to say it.

I would appreciate it if would let me know what you think my intent was since you don't state your belief explicitly above.

My intent was to get people to think seriously about how WNs will deal with the jewish problem when they gain power. It was also to lead them to consider the difference between what they might want and what they would be willing to personally do.

It was neither my intent nor my desire to get people to respond in a way that would reflect badly on us. It seems crystal clear from what I say in the article that I advocate option #3. That's how I voted in the poll.

In the event of a WN ascent to power, we certainly cannot allow the jews to continue living among us. One of these three options must be exercised. I believe that option one is both morally unsound and could not in fact be implemented.

I hope that this clarifies my intent for you, Hitler Goddess. I have always found your posts to be reasonable and civil...the one above to me having those same qualities. I assure you that I intended no harm. Only thoughtful reflection.

For more clarification of my position see the discussion on this thread:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=30265

It would impractical and costly to try to contain the jew in israel. And all of the neighboring countries hate them rightfully so, as it was wrong to steal their land and create israel as a sovereign country in the first place.

I am assuming that people who have voted in this poll and are offering comments have read what I wrote.

Would it really be " impractical and costly to try to contain...in israel."18 million jews stripped of most of their wealth and all of their offensive weapons, confronted by a powerful Federation of White Nations with 1 billion white people? I think it could be easily done.

As to your second objection, I clearly state in my article that we would not steal the Palestinian's land but rather buy it from them with wealth confiscated from the jews. Another reading of what I wrote should clarify this point for you.

Thank you for voting and for commenting.

New Guinea would be a good place for the JEW(s).
In addition to being an extraordinarily
Kosher diet for the cannibalistic natives

The concept of alternative locations to which the jews could be relocated had not occurred to me but I am open to discussing that possibility. However, I think that Palestine is the most practical option.

Death to jews. A final solution. Banish them and they'll just come back to swindle your grandchildren like they have over and over throughout history.
If some are too squeamish for this then leave the 'dirty work' to those of us
who aren't. People who don't approve of this need some 'clockwork orange'
style 're-education' anyways.

Picture yourself in the large public square in the Capital of the Federation of White Nations. A line of 18 million people stretches out before you farther than you can see. One by one they step up onto the gallow's scaffolding.

Could you really pull the lever 18 million times and personally watch the stark reality of those people screaming and dying in agony before your very eyes? Could you really repress the enormous cumulative guilt that would build up in your conscience lever-pull after lever-pull?

Perhaps you could, but you will excuse me if I doubt that. There is a difference between fantasy and reality, between hatred and anger, and between wanting and doing.

Or do you see other hands pulling that lever?

Death to jews. A final solution. Banish them and they'll just come back to swindle your grandchildren like they have over and over throughout history.

Stripped of everything and contained to one part of the world with a bunch of hostile neighbors and I would assume survival would be the first and most important thing on their minds. And I don't know how long they would be around given that whole scenerio. And if you and others were teaching your children and grandchildren about the jews and why this banishement, if you will to Israel was neccessary, things like this would be a little more difficult. A people who do not allow themselves to be swindled will not be. If you fail to see and address that, there will be plenty of others who will grab on to that, and seek to do the same, after the Jews are "gone"

I said what I did mostly hoping some sense would prevail and that maybe some would avoid the Paul Drake type posts, that a certain tribe we are talking about here loves to see.

brutus has the best idea.

See my response to Paul Drake above.

As for sending them to Palestine. To actively brutalize the Palestinian people with more Jews would be a cowardly and unworthy act, just as it was in 1948. Enkidu

Again, I ask people to read what I have written. My plan does not call for sending the jews to brutalize the Palestinians. It clearly states the we would buy Palestine with the jews' wealth and pay the Palestinians to relocate.

I believe that the Palestinians would gladly accept this deal as an alternative to more of what they have now. I doubt that even they would vote for option #1 though the vote would probably be close.

In any case, the jews would become a problem for their genetically related semite cousins in the region. Let them sort it out. They would no longer be a problem for white people.

Stripped of everything and contained to one part of the world with a bunch of hostile neighbors and I would assume survival would be the first and most important thing on their minds. And if you and others were teaching your children and grandchildren about the jews and why this banishement, if you will to Israel was neccessary, things like this would be a little more difficult. A people who do not allow themselves to be swindled will not be. If you fail to see and address that, there will be plenty of others who will grab on to that, and seek to do the same, after the Jews are "gone"

You bring up an excellent point, HG.

How likely is it that 1 billion white people, finally awakened to the jewish problem, would allow themselves to ever be swindled again by the jews or, for that matter, by any other in-group? My faith in the intelligence of white people leads me to believe that that would never happen.

I said what I did mostly hoping some sense would prevail and that maybe some would avoid the Paul Drake type posts, that a certain tribe we are talking about here loves to see.

That was precisely my hope also. My intent was simply to get people to think about the issue deeply, taking an honest look into their hearts.

The Jewish race and all traces of the stain that it has left on the World, must be annihilated. This question does expose the differences in White people. We, the kind of people on this board, are immune to Jews, it is our White herds of low-grade people who get taken over by them. Should these herds exist? I think not. I also feel that a man who could not bear to even plan to kill out the Jews, is a weak and unmanly fellow.