So, my answer pretty much is your option 1.

No.

No, but I did go back and read your first one again.

Ah, I must add that in this case, my proposal of a mass educational program would include much propaganda focusing on Christians. Once they see that they have been duped, their strong vestiges of morality will demand swift justice, and again we will have Krystallnact II. Once Krystallnact II is complete the newly informed masses will build New Wolzek. Again, I'm very serious.

We'll just have to wait see about that. I'd at least like to get to that point. If I am unable to pitch hymie and his dirty family into the oven, you can have your way with them.

post by Burrhus
I have three questions for you, AR. Have you read all of the posts on this thread, especially mine? If so, did you read them attentively and with an open mind? Do you understand the line of reasoning that I have put forth in them?

If your answer to all three is yes, then could you write in your own words without copy and paste or quoting my words what you understand me to have said? I only want to know if you do understand my line of reasoning and still disagree with it or if your disagreement is the result of misunderstanding what I have written.

If your answer to the questions is no, would you please read them carefully, with an open mind and try to follow the logic of my argument. If this course of action leads you to understand my reasoning and agree with me, then let me know that. If it does not, we can then discuss where the source of disagreement lies.

That's rational discourse.

I await your response.

Please re-read the quote immediately above. My request was that you explain to me in your own words what you understand to be my line of reasoning leading me to conclude that option one is inappropriate.

After you do that, we can have a rational discussion about why we disagree. I may be wrong, you may be right. I always stand ready to be shown the error of my way and change my opinion.

But it isn't reasonable to assert that I am wrong if you can't demonstrate that you understand what I have said and show me the errors in my reasoning. I am willing to listen and be corrected.

I am only trying to find out why we disagree.

Please try again.

Please re-read the quote immediately above. My request was that you explain to me in your own words what you understand to be my line of reasoning leading me to conclude that option one is inappropriate.

Your line of "reasoning" was that the WN's who come to power will be overwhelmingly Christian (as you implicitly state) and their "strong vestiges of morality" would stop them from pitching arm loads of kike-fags into the fire.

I am telling you that this is where you are wrong, because a mass public education program that I am offering would educate these Christians as to the truth, and said Christians would lead the charge.

You went awry in your first option. You didn't consider that the masses of empty-heads rarely have an original thought and need to be lead. We, as WN in power will provide their much needed leadership.

After you do that, we can have a rational discussion about why we disagree. I may be wrong, you may be right. I always stand ready to be shown the error of my way and change my opinion.

Indeed, please proceed.

But it isn't reasonable to assert that I am wrong if you can't demonstrate that you understand what I have said and show me the errors in my reasoning. I am willing to listen and be corrected.

I am saying that you failed to consider that the 'public that is trained to to do what they're told to do' will be our asset. We'll do the telling. You're entire premise for dismissing option 1 is the fact that the masses won't have the fortitude to carry through with something like my New Wolzek strategy because they are "moral" Christians. I haven't met one yet. These walking bastions of "morality" are some of the biggest war-hawks I've ever seen, and we simply need to re-direct their focus.

New Wolzek: the time has come.

Why deprive our White women the pleasures of participating in the re-location program if they so desire?

Rather selfish on our part, wouldn't you say?

Why should we have all the fun?

I say, share it with the women.

Let the women have at 'em!!!!!!

Gosh Professor, I was kind of thinking that after White Nationalism comes to power that women might be convinced to stay at home and take care of a whole slew of new white babies.

This is where we may differ, then. In an all-white society, I view women as having the same social equality as men. Kind of like the social set-up portrayed in Robert Heinlein's "Starship Troopers". You see, I don't view women capable of handling a gun as "unfeminine" or "dykish". Even in the Old West, along the pioneer trail, our women took up arms as well, if the wagon train came under heavy Indian attack. Personally, that makes me proud to know that. Besides, the graphic looked sexy, so I guess I'm guilty of being a sexist in this case. But the thought of knocking on some white woman's door, putting her in handcuffs, and taking her away to jail charged with "illegally holding a job while feminine" strikes me as ludicrous. I believe we'll have more than enough female baby-makers to keep our birth-rate high.

And remember too, no female would be required to join the military. And that option is left over specifically to allow her the opportunity to become a mother. Given the opportunity for women to work or to be a home-maker and a baby-maker, I believe most will gladly choose the latter. Remember, too, that even Hitler had women working in wartime Deutschland, and, before the war, women worked in bierkellars, hotels, restaurants, and a hundred other places in the Fatherland.

Your line of "reasoning" was that the WN's who come to power will be overwhelmingly Christian (as you implicitly state) and their "strong vestiges of morality" would stop them from pitching arm loads of kike-fags into the fire.

I am telling you that this is where you are wrong, because a mass public education program that I am offering would educate these Christians as to the truth, and said Christians would lead the charge.

You went awry in your first option. You didn't consider that the masses of empty-heads rarely have an original thought and need to be lead. We, as WN in power will provide their much needed leadership.

I am saying that you failed to consider that the 'public that is trained to to do what they're told to do' will be our asset. We'll do the telling. You're entire premise for dismissing option 1 is the fact that the masses won't have the fortitude to carry through with something like my New Wolzek strategy because they are "moral" Christians. I haven't met one yet. These walking bastions of "morality" are some of the biggest war-hawks I've ever seen, and we simply need to re-direct their focus.

New Wolzek: the time has come.

Well, that clears it up. The disagreement is the result of mis-understanding my line of reasoning. Thank you. That's all that I wanted to know.

Let's leave it that.

If there are those on this board interested in supporting (my newly renamed) Madagascar Mandate, and have a website in which we could promote its objectives and goals, I think we could effectively promote a new and viable solution to the long divisive "jewish question", leaving us to move on to the greater goal of actually laying down a tactical blueprint for the reconquest of North America.

If there are those on this board interested in supporting (my newly renamed) Madagascar Mandate, and have a website in which we could promote its objectives and goals, I think we could effectively promote a new and viable solution to the long divisive "jewish question", leaving us to move on to the greater goal of actually laying down a tactical blueprint for the reconquest of North America.

You can promote it on www.national-socialism.com.

We don't allow NSM'ers or their supporters to post on our forum, www.national-socialism.com/forum. Only one NSM supporter signed up and we banned/chastised him.