Unless I'm mistaken, a good summary of your strategy in broad strokes is "reduce politics to two stark choices, whites versus jews. Cut through the phony opposition on the right by using constant attacks on the phony right."

Given this, where do you see conservative and race realist writings fitting in (Sailer, Taylor, etc.) in terms of whether they have value for WNism? Should WNists use the portions that are relevant, or reject all of it because using any of it is an implied endorsement of conservative positions?

Say a conservative compiles research showing how whites are getting screwed by affirmative action (or whatever), but then doesn't say what to do about it or proposes something stupid and counter-productive as a solution (like vote Republican).

How should WNists go about using data/arguments that help without also endorsing conservative positions/people? It seems a contradiction to attack a person as a worthless enemy while at the same time citing their work.