Read Between Lines ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Read Between Lines - White = Smarter

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
622 Views
IceQueen
(@icequeen)
Posts: 105
Estimable Member
Topic starter
 

I found this article while searching for advice on selecting the right school. (Other than my tactical sitting outside to watch what comes out approach.)
If you read between the lines, what this article is REALLY saying, is that intelligence has everything to do with how White you are, not how much money you have.

I have highlighted points of interest, and will comment further within:

Privileged children excel, even at low-performing comprehensives
Nicola Woolcock

*Middle-class* parents obsessed with getting their children into the best schools may be wasting their time and money, academics say today.

They found that children from *privileged* backgrounds excelled when they were deliberately sent to inner-city comprehensives by "parents" opposed to private schooling.

[color="Purple"]Code words for White. Also, these so called parents should have their children taken away from them for being abusive, and mentally unfit.

Most of the children “performed brilliantly” at GCSE and A level and 15 per cent of those who went on to university took places at Oxford or Cambridge.

To give their children “the best start in life”, many parents choose to live in catchment areas of high-performing schools, “find God” to gain their child a place at a faith establishment or make financial sacrifices to pay for their child’s independent schooling.

However, the researchers decided to analyze the progress of the offspring of “those white, urban, middle-class parents who consciously choose for their children to be educated at their local state secondary, whatever the league table positioning”.

This group attended average or poorly performing schools in working-class or racially mixed areas. Here they thrived academically and were often given special attention by teachers keen to improve the school’s results, according to the study by professors in education from the universities of Cambridge, Sunderland and West of England (UWE).

[color="Red"]**The only failure was in social integration**, which had been the very reason most parents sent their child to the school. [color="Red"]**Most children from middle-class families mixed only with pupils from identical backgrounds.**

[color="Purple"]So, there may be hope yet?!? Whoo hoo!

The research found “segregation within schools, with white middle-class children clustered in top sets, with little interaction with children from other backgrounds”.

Professor David James, from UWE, said: “But we wanted to discover what motivates parents who instead choose to send their children to local comprehensives that appear to be performing poorly.

“Most children who had this choice made for them have gone on to perform brilliantly in GCSEs, A levels and then on to university entrance, including a much higher than average entry to Oxbridge.”

The researchers interviewed 124 families from London and two other cities. Eighty-three per cent of the parents had degrees and a quarter were educated to postgraduate level.

They included three Labour Party activists and two who worked in a social exclusion research unit. In 70 per cent of families, one or both parents worked in the public sector. Most described themselves as left-wing or liberal.

The report found: “Some parents were motivated by a commitment to state-funded education and egalitarian ideals and many had an active dislike for privileged educational routes on the grounds that they were socially divisive. Many wanted their children to have an educational experience that would prepare them for a globalized, socially diverse world.

“These parents positioned themselves in a way we termed** ‘a darker shade of pale’,**:puke: as part of a more culturally tolerant and even anti-racist white middle class.

“They felt strongly that higher-achieving schools would not provide the kind of experience of the ‘real world’ that their children needed.”

However, the researchers said such parents did not consider that they were sacrificing their children’s education, with many seeing it as a worthwhile, if risky, strategy.

“Many parents said they could and would pull out if things did not go well,” the report said. Some parents who attended privileged schools made the choice as a “conscious reaction to their own schooling”. Others wanted their children “to compete in ordinary circumstances”.

It added: “Anxiety was not absent, especially when their children were attending schools that were pathologized — or even demonized — by other white middle-class parents.”

But even though those sending their children to comprehensives were open and tolerant of other backgrounds, in some cases researchers noted “**elitism and a sense of intellectual and social superiority** — a sense that would be confirmed by their own child’s relative success”.

[color="Purple"]See, lemmings? Why bother? They'll still find a way to accuse you of racism. You might as well remove your head from you behind and see the world for what it is.

Perhaps they felt "intellectually superior because they WERE! Did that ever cross the idiot researchers minds?

Link with comments -
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article3405934.ece


 
Posted : 04/03/2009 12:44 am
Share: