I'm not attacking you. I appreciate you -- as I think you should by now realize. I'm trying to look at this issue from the standpoint of what's best. That's all.

Best is like beauty, It's in the eye of the beholder. Everyone had ideas about what to do with everyone else's money. Rounder had a fair idea in the beginning, and I'm sure if he splits the remaining money between his campaign and VNN, he'll listed it in the "Miller campaign contributions" thread.

Additionally, recent revelations to me regarding:
a)inter-racial hard core porn on the front page
b)the neglect of AM to perform his duties as a mod, resulting in the board being turned into a "vulgarity laden and personal attack version of a wild west shootout"
have me wondering whether its really in the best interest of our race to distribute the tabloid.

What's best ?? What's best is for you to do the tabloid clerk job yourself. Answer why not ???

At least you've voiced interest. Few others have. So do the freakin job.

1. I don't want to promoted to my level of incompetence. I know what I'm relatively good at: analyzing, seeing the best path, advising, writing. And what I'm not very good at: fluent, effective public speaking; managing; leading. I'm most effective as the advisor and writer somewhat behind the scenes. That, really, is how I can help the cause best. In fact, that (advising) is the role I am doing right now on this issue with you.

2. I don't have the time to give the tabloid the devotion it deserves. I'm still working for a living.

3. I'm not ready to stick my head out of the fox-hole that far as yet. Call it cowardice, if you like. Perhaps it is. But there may also be other reasons.

You, on the other hand, are a natural leader. Your place is out in front, being who you are, inspiring the troops into action. (But you need to listen to the good advice of your advisors to keep you leading in the right direction. Just an observation.)

Best is like beauty, It's in the eye of the beholder. Everyone had ideas about what to do with everyone else's money. Rounder had a fair idea in the beginning, and I'm sure if he splits the remaining money between his campaign and VNN, he'll listed it in the "Miller campaign contributions" thread.

I think I'm right in this, Steve. I really do.

Additionally, recent revelations to me regarding:
a)inter-racial hard core porn on the front page
b)the neglect of AM to perform his duties as a mod, resulting in the board being turned into a "vulgarity laden and personal attack version of a wild west shootout"
have me wondering whether its really in the best interest of our race to distribute the tabloid.

That's a different issue -- and I agree with you and Rounder on it.

The jew has millions of newspapers being delivered everyday.

It’s ridiculous for anyone to suggest that printed media is somehow irrelevant. We must be MULTIMEDIA. Anything less is wrongheaded.

Why should we limits ourselves? Who would that benefit?

The jew has millions of newspapers being delivered everyday.

It&#8217]Of course. We shouldn't. Good point.

 

I do agree with those who think that the Leischgirls etc. need to be swept into a corner somewhere on the forum -- or off it altogether -- and that their remaining counters the effectiveness of the paper in bringing newbies here.

I do agree with those who think that the Leischgirls etc. need to be swept into a corner somewhere on the forum -- or off it altogether -- and that their remaining counters the effectiveness of the paper in bringing newbies here.

I think we need to determine who is the target audience. If as I am told, that Alex's target audience is young White males, who are not offended by "F' words or inter-racial porn, then that leaves the receipients in my paper route out.(White, middle/working class predominately Christian homeowners over 30)

The jew has millions of newspapers being delivered everyday.

It’s ridiculous for anyone to suggest that printed media is somehow irrelevant. We must be MULTIMEDIA. Anything less is wrongheaded.

Why should we limits ourselves? Who would that benefit?

I think we need to determine who is the target audience. If as I am told, that Alex's target audience is young White males, who are not offended by "F' words or inter-racial porn, then that leaves the receipients in my paper route out.(White, middle/working class predominately Christian homeowners over 30)
In which case it would be better if I pack up.

I think we need to determine who is the target audience. If as I am told, that Alex's target audience is young White males, who are not offended by "F' words or inter-racial porn, then that leaves the receipients in my paper route out.(White, middle/working class predominately Christian homeowners over 30)

True. Alex and the next tabloid clerk need to get together and decide this. Or throw the question open to all of us at VNN -- to get some input by a bunch of smart White men.

Newspapers are dying nationwide.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/18516
The developments at the Tribune Company mirror those in the newspaper industry as a whole. For most big-city papers, circulation is declining, advertising is shrinking, and reporters and editors are being let go. The full extent of the crisis became apparent in May, when the Audit Bureau of Circulations reported circulation figures for 814 daily papers for the six months ending last March. Compared to the same period the year before, total daily circulation fell by 1.9 percent and Sunday circulation by 2.5 percent. Sunday circulation fell by 2 percent at The Boston Globe, 3.3 percent at the Philadelphia Inquirer, 4.7 percent at the Chicago Tribune, and 8.5 percent at the Baltimore Sun. At the Los Angeles Times, circulation fell 6.4 percent daily and 7.9 percent on Sundays. Even The Washington Post, the dominant paper in a region of strong economic growth, has suffered a 5.2 percent daily circulation decline over a two-year period.

Newspapers are dying nationwide.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/18516
The developments at the Tribune Company mirror those in the newspaper industry as a whole. For most big-city papers, circulation is declining, advertising is shrinking, and reporters and editors are being let go. The full extent of the crisis became apparent in May, when the Audit Bureau of Circulations reported circulation figures for 814 daily papers for the six months ending last March. Compared to the same period the year before, total daily circulation fell by 1.9 percent and Sunday circulation by 2.5 percent. Sunday circulation fell by 2 percent at The Boston Globe, 3.3 percent at the Philadelphia Inquirer, 4.7 percent at the Chicago Tribune, and 8.5 percent at the Baltimore Sun. At the Los Angeles Times, circulation fell 6.4 percent daily and 7.9 percent on Sundays. Even The Washington Post, the dominant paper in a region of strong economic growth, has suffered a 5.2 percent daily circulation decline over a two-year period.

Pssssst, wanna hear a secret? We're not getting into the newspaper business, we're trying to open some White minds to the dangers facing our race and get them to WN sites. Shheeeeesh!:rolleyes:

Putting the money into a "tabloid fund" means turning the money over to someone distributors might not want their money turned over to.

When I return their money, they could simply send the money to whomever Alex might approve of as "tabloid fund holder of monies". That way contributors would be making the decision themselves, rather than you.

But as I said, if Alex approves a new tabloid clerk, I'll simply mail a check to the printers in payment for however many copies are printed. Even if it requires all we have in the tabloid fund. This would be the very best thing we can do.

Now go find a volunteer. How about you? Or why not ?? You can't say you don't have time, judging from how much time you spend here. But if you do take the job, you must assure contributors, you'll continue the same 100%, fool proof, finance reporting and disclosure system I started from day one.

I find it "interesting" you'd rather the money be sent to an undetermined individual, rather than to Alex for VNN, and to my campaign for Congress.

Have you been advertising yourself as a candidate for "holder of monies" ???

The fund could be held by you, if you continue to be the tabloid clerk, or Alex or the new tabloid clerk. It should be an inviolable fund -- for the tabloid or (if no tabloid) other VNN projects.

The fund could be held by you, if you continue to be the tabloid clerk, or Alex or the new tabloid clerk. It should be an inviolable fund -- for the tabloid or (if no tabloid) other VNN projects.

More inter-racial porn?

Our target audience is White people with the wherewithal to comprehend our message. Yes, young White males should get primary consideration for obvious reasons. And we should be aware of the fact that our media will be reshaping their attitude. Do we really want to continue the jew’s media so-called youthful relevancy by trying to appeal to a jewed whigger? Or do we want to mold our youth to the Aryan ideal? Alex Linder is a master at walking this fine line.

It would be a mistake to pool all of our resources into one medium. What if we are wrong by assuming that the internet is the way to go? What if the jew passes laws to shut the internet down? Where will we be then?

We should carefully expand our print publication and at the same time be careful with the allocation of resources as not to lock ourselves into a blind alley. By continuing our print publication we will continue to improve the quality and thereby it’s effectiveness.

To cite the statistical downfall of the jew’s print media and use that as a reason to discontinue our print media is disingenuous. The jew’s print media is failing because the jew’s message is failing and the jew’s staunchest audience are a bunch of illiterate morons, and that is a primary reason for their print media decline. We want those with the ability to at least be able to read. Targeting those Whites will assure the potential to recruit our future leaders.

There may very well come a time when it’s time to lop off our print media efforts however, I don’t think that time is now.

Our target audience is White people with the wherewithal to comprehend our message. Yes, young White males should get primary consideration for obvious reasons. And we should be aware of the fact that our media will be reshaping their attitude. Do we really want to continue the jew’s media so-called youthful relevancy by trying to appeal to a jewed whigger? Or do we want to mold our youth to the Aryan ideal? Alex Linder is a master at walking this fine line.

It would be a mistake to pool all of our resources into one medium. What if we are wrong by assuming that the internet is the way to go? What if the jew passes laws to shut the internet down? Where will we be then?

We should carefully expand our print publication and at the same time be careful with the allocation of resources as not to lock ourselves into a blind alley. By continuing our print publication we will continue to improve the quality and thereby it’s effectiveness.

To cite the statistical downfall of the jew’s print media and use that as a reason to discontinue our print media is disingenuous. The jew’s print media is failing because the jew’s message is failing and the jew’s staunchest audience are a bunch of illiterate morons, and that is a primary reason for their print media decline. We want those with the ability to at least be able to read. Targeting those Whites will assure the potential to recruit our future leaders.

There may very well come a time when it’s time to lop off our print media efforts however, I don’t think that time is now.

Hopefully VNN could adhere to some basic standard of behavior which would not immediatly exclude a large segment of Whites.
On second thought, forget it, I'm not gonna kiss somebody's ass to get them to have some semblence of decency. I'll find another paper to deliver.