Newspapers are dying nationwide.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/18516
The developments at the Tribune Company mirror those in the newspaper industry as a whole. For most big-city papers, circulation is declining, advertising is shrinking, and reporters and editors are being let go. The full extent of the crisis became apparent in May, when the Audit Bureau of Circulations reported circulation figures for 814 daily papers for the six months ending last March. Compared to the same period the year before, total daily circulation fell by 1.9 percent and Sunday circulation by 2.5 percent. Sunday circulation fell by 2 percent at The Boston Globe, 3.3 percent at the Philadelphia Inquirer, 4.7 percent at the Chicago Tribune, and 8.5 percent at the Baltimore Sun. At the Los Angeles Times, circulation fell 6.4 percent daily and 7.9 percent on Sundays. Even The Washington Post, the dominant paper in a region of strong economic growth, has suffered a 5.2 percent daily circulation decline over a two-year period.

This same disinformation, misleading BS is repeated over and over again, at regular intervals. I've seen it dozens of times. It's purpose is to cast doubt, thus convince some VNN'ers not to support WN newspaper projects. And me and/or others like brutus, have to constantly respond with common sense and facts. Then the subversives wait awhile, and come back with the same BS "theory".

The kikes crank out tens of millions of newspapers every day. This fact alone debunks the above BS, not to even mention all the other favorable facts.

Good butt-kicking posts by brutus and SSteve.

The fund could be held by you, if you continue to be the tabloid clerk, or Alex or the new tabloid clerk. It should be an inviolable fund -- for the tabloid or (if no tabloid) other VNN projects.

But I've resigned. No way does Alex have the time or interest in keeping track of financial transactions involving a newspaper with all it entails, and there ain't no new tabloid clerk in sight or hearing. You're wrong again.

For other VNN projects ??? Don't you think contributors should make that decision, since it's their money, and BEFORE it's put into an "Other Project" fund, kept by person or persons, they may or may not approve of. Go pool them and find out.

But I've resigned. No way does Alex have the time or interest in keeping track of financial transactions involving a newspaper with all it entails, and there ain't no new tabloid clerk in sight or hearing. You're wrong again.

For other VNN projects ??? Don't you think contributors should make that decision, since it's their money, and BEFORE it's put into an "Other Project" fund, kept by person or persons, they may or may not approve of. Go pool them and find out.

That's my 2 cents of advice, Rounder. I'll leave it at that.

RE: SSteve

Hopefully VNN could adhere to some basic standard of behavior which would not immediatly exclude a large segment of Whites.
On second thought, forget it, I'm not gonna kiss somebody's ass to get them to have some semblence of decency. I'll find another paper to deliver.

I beg your pardon, but I’m not sure what you’re talking about.

If you mean that you’re discouraged because you think that VNN will turn-out smut for smut’s sake, then I think that you’re mistaken.

That’s why I said that Alex can be very good at bringing us a younger audience and yet keeping this website on the cutting edge.

Personally I don’t agree with vulgarity, but I’m not a hypocrite and I won’t say that when I’m stressed that I won’t let a nasty word or two, fly out. We live in a jew cesspool and part of our outreach program is to talk to the folk in a way that they can relate. Most young people have been brainwashed to equate prudishness with badness and thereby they would reject our message if we came-on as overly prudish.

After a lemming is awakened, then they, themselves can peel away at the layers of jew filth that encase them. To divest oneself of vulgarity is indeed a good thing, just as being virtuously prudent with one’s morality is also a good thing and the ultimate Aryan ideal.

I've got 2 better ideas. (1) You take over as tabloid clerk, and/or (2) stick the tabloid project up your ass.

I always thought that you were an insufferable prick because you felt it was the best strategy to get tabloids printed and distributed. Yet, here you are, a retired tabloid clerk, and you attack Devere for no reason at all. It's obvious now that you are a bitter, angry old man.

I think it's time to take up a collection, get you a $25 gift certificate to Denny's, and put your old ass out to pasture. If I can raise the funds, will you accept the terms????

Yeh, the New York Review of Books is putting out anit prop just to keep a WN tabloid from being supported. What kind of drugs are you on?

You keep stating how the jews are printing all these newspapers, well the big ones are losing readership and the small ones are only concerned who won the local pie baking contest. Get a grip. This tabloid is a waste, just like your run for Congress.

Yeh, the New York Review of Books is putting out anit prop just to keep a WN tabloid from being supported. What kind of drugs are you on?

You keep stating how the jews are printing all these newspapers, well the big ones are losing readership and the small ones are only concerned who won the local pie baking contest. Get a grip. This tabloid is a waste, just like your run for Congress.

Whether or not Rounder gets elected, do you realize how many Whites are being awakened by his radio spots and TV ads?
Of course you do, that's what really scares you.

B.T.W. how would you like to be done, rare, medium or well?

Our target audience is White people with the wherewithal to comprehend our message. Yes, young White males should get primary consideration for obvious reasons. And we should be aware of the fact that our media will be reshaping their attitude. Do we really want to continue the jew&#8217]Yes. Young White males, but mold them to the Aryan ideal. But also, as a secondary target, White men of all ages. We need every White man awakened. The tabloid can awaken in a general sense -- whether or not the newly awakened come to VNN immediately for deeper education.

It would be a mistake to pool all of our resources into one medium. What if we are wrong by assuming that the internet is the way to go? What if the jew passes laws to shut the internet down? Where will we be then?

Excellent point. Diversity enhances survival -- in media.

We should carefully expand our print publication and at the same time be careful with the allocation of resources as not to lock ourselves into a blind alley. By continuing our print publication we will continue to improve the quality and thereby it’s effectiveness.

Yes. And it would be good to have a way to guage its effectiveness.

To cite the statistical downfall of the jew’s print media and use that as a reason to discontinue our print media is disingenuous. The jew’s print media is failing because the jew’s message is failing and the jew’s staunchest audience are a bunch of illiterate morons, and that is a primary reason for their print media decline. We want those with the ability to at least be able to read. Targeting those Whites will assure the potential to recruit our future leaders.

That's right. The internet is showing up, by contrast, the jew lies in all of their media -- print and the rest. That's the main reason their newsprint media is declining -- although the increasingly dumbed down population is also becoming incapable of reading and disinclined to read anything in hardcopy print.

There may very well come a time when it’s time to lop off our print media efforts however, I don’t think that time is now.

Not now and not for the foreseeable future.

Welcome back, Rounder. Nothing changed except PORC got banned.

As far as newspapers go, the fact that circulation is 'declining' means less than nothing when tens of millions are delivered every day across the nation. In other words, the so-called 'decline' amounts to a drop in the bucket when dealing with such large numbers of papers and readers. And the plain fact is that TAA and TWPL got so much media attention from so many different jewsmedia outlets (newspapers, radio and TV) that TAA and TWPL are household names where they were delivered. Bottom line? Newspapers work. They are the oldest form of mass media and are here to stay. I hope Rounder is too.

Welcome back, Rounder. Nothing changed except PORC got banned.

As far as newspapers go, the fact that circulation is 'declining' means less than nothing when tens of millions are delivered every day across the nation. In other words, the so-called 'decline' amounts to a drop in the bucket when dealing with such large numbers of papers and readers. And the plain fact is that TAA and TWPL got so much media attention from so many different jewsmedia outlets (newspapers, radio and TV) that TAA and TWPL are household names where they were delivered. Bottom line? Newspapers work. They are the oldest form of mass media and are here to stay. I hope Rounder is too.

Yeh, the New York Review of Books is putting out anit prop just to keep a WN tabloid from being supported. What kind of drugs are you on?

You keep stating how the jews are printing all these newspapers, well the big ones are losing readership and the small ones are only concerned who won the local pie baking contest. Get a grip. This tabloid is a waste, just like your run for Congress.

The Jews don't make money selling newspapers. They make money selling ADVERTIZING in the newspapers. Running a tabloid that doesn't sell advertizing is like carrying water in bucket full of holes. Sure, you want to spread the Message, but there are other WN's who also want to spread THEIR message and would pay to advertize in a tabloid that appeals to white folks. Without advertizing, you will always be beggerly poor and scrambling for funds.

The Jews don't make money selling newspapers. They make money selling ADVERTIZING in the newspapers. Running a tabloid that doesn't sell advertizing is like carrying water in bucket full of holes. Sure, you want to spread the Message, but there are other WN's who also want to spread THEIR message and would pay to advertize in a tabloid that appeals to white folks. Without advertizing, you will always be beggerly poor and scrambling for funds.

What a good point! Of course, the format and quality and content would then be necessarily influenced -- and perhaps compromised -- by those advertisers.

The Jews don't make money selling newspapers. They make money selling ADVERTIZING in the newspapers. Running a tabloid that doesn't sell advertizing is like carrying water in bucket full of holes. Sure, you want to spread the Message, but there are other WN's who also want to spread THEIR message and would pay to advertize in a tabloid that appeals to white folks. Without advertizing, you will always be beggerly poor and scrambling for funds.

Helloooooooooooooo, for those who haven't been paying attention, one of the reasons Rounder is stepping down is the increasing difficulty finding advertisers. Reason: Threads that start with the "F" word.
He didn't mention if the inter-racial porn had any adverse effects on advertising.
I guess that puts us back at square one.

Great to have you back Rounder -- Yeee Haaa !!!!

1. The BNP in Britain and other WN orgs in Europe main recuitment tool is a newspaper - numb skulls see 2 & 3.

2. The newspaper drives people to the website

3. The website drives them to join

GOT IT ?

Helloooooooooooooo, for those who haven't been paying attention, one of the reasons Rounder is stepping down is the increasing difficulty finding advertisers. Reason: Threads that start with the "F" word.
He didn't mention if the inter-racial porn had any adverse effects on advertising.
I guess that puts us back at square one.

Do advertisers accept the word "nigger" -- and "kike" and "cunt" and "shit" and "spic" and "gook" and etc.? I'm asking seriously. These are common everyday language at VNN, are they not? Is "fuck" the only forbidden word to advertisers? "Nigger" and "kike" are the most evil words in the English/jew language these days. Aren't they worse than "fuck"? I'm asking a serious question. What's the point of getting rid of "fuck" and keeping cunt, kike, nigger, shit, spic, gook, and so on? Aren't they ALL "offensive" words?

And don't they ALL discourage first time tabloid-sent newbies? After all, "fuck" has actually been made coo' these days because niggers use it as their every fourth word, do they not? Whatever niggers do is coo', right? Especially to young White men. Right?