Forum
- Home
- Forum
Notifications
Clear all
General Discussion
13
Posts
6
Users
0
Reactions
1,205
Views
Topic starter
Relief Commemorating the Horrific Death of St. Simon of Trent 1475 A.D., Child Martyr & Canonized Saint, at the Hands of Perfidious Jews
http://www.stsimonoftrent.com/
The small Simon, a little boy from Trent, was slayed on the 21st March, 1475 A.D., on Maundy-Thursday during Holy Week. The Jews of this town wanted to celebrate their Passover in their own way; so they secretly abducted the small boy and carried him to the house of the Jew Samuel. During Holy Week on Maundy-Thursday, the day before Good Friday, "and" on the day before the outlawed "Perfidious Passover", about three hours after supper, the little boy, like children do, was sitting in front of his parents’ house. Neither his father nor mother were home at the time as they were at Church. It was at this time that the Jew Tobias approached the child, who was not quite 30 months old, and while speaking kindly and offering the boy a piece of money, picked him up and carried him at once to the house of the Jew Samuel.
When night fell, the twin brothers Saligman and Samuel, with Tobias, Vitalis (Veitel), Moses, Israel and Mayr, undressed the little boy and unmercifully butchered him. While Moses strangled him with a handkerchief as he lay across Samuel’s knee, pieces of flesh from his neck were cut with a knife and the blood collected in a bowl. At the same time, they punctured the naked offering with needles and murmured Hebrew curses. They then cut pieces of flesh from the boy’s arm and legs and collected the blood in pots.
Finally the torturers mitated the crucifixion by holding the twitching body upside down and the arms outstretched and during this horrible act they spoke the following:
Take this, crucified Jesus. Just as our forefathers did once, so may all Christians by land and sea perish.
They then rushed to their meal. When the child had died they threw his body in the river which flowed by their house. After this, they joyously celebrated Passover. The case was prosecuted by Bishop Hinderbach, and the Jews were sentenced to death. Immediately, all Jews of the area protested the sentence and succeeded in gaining a new trial for the accused. It was tried before Giudici of Ventimiglia, and he confirmed the sentence. Again because of Jewish protests, the case came before the court of Pope Sixtus IV. He commissioned the greatest and most famous professor of law at that time, Panvino, to serve as Chief Justice. Assisted by six cardinals, he too confirmed the sentence.
*The court officially stated:
The Hebrews killed the little boy Simon, in order to obey a rabbinical religious law; their motive being to serve a most wicked piety and devotion by obtaining Christian blood for the celebration of Passover.
The *records of this trial were originally kept in the secret archive of the Citadel of St. Angelo and were then transferred to the Vatican, where they are now available for examination. They were disclosed by Pope Benedict XIV. Also Pope Clement XIV as legal counsellor for the Holy Office, before he became Pope, verified the murders of both St. Simon of Trent and St. Andreas of Rinn (remember St. Dominguito del Val, Mártir) as cases of ritual murder almost 300 years later, in 1770. The boy [Simon] who was tortured to death at Trent was officially canonized by Pope Sixtus V. The Holy Infant Martyr, St. Simon of Trent's feast day is always celebrated on March 24th.
Posted : 23/09/2006 2:00 am
Topic starter
Ya ever notice that if you do a google search on anything the jews might find sensitive like the story of this little boy or any historical figure that spoke out against the jews or were victimized by them or any particulary nasty jew, it's always the jew-ridden WIKIPEDIA that comes up as the first search return? Oh and JEWWATCH has been bumped by WIKIPEDIA as well.
The Jews are enemies of God and foes of our holy religion. ~ Padre Pio
Posted : 23/09/2006 9:41 am
Action Alert, what has your research into Catholicism taught you about the relationship between Protestantism and Judaism?
__________________
[url=http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=944_1216676169]/url]
Posted : 25/09/2006 2:38 am
Topic starter
Action Alert, what has your research into Catholicism taught you about the relationship between Protestantism and Judaism?
Many Protestants STILL dislike Catholics
There are over 10,000 different Protestant denominations.
Catholic Bible has 7 additional books that Luther removed from Lutheran Bible.
The "New Israel" is the Church so when Protestants like the snake-handler HAGEE say that we have to support Israel he proves to be a heretic.
Vatican II went way too far.
...more later
Posted : 25/09/2006 3:08 am
When Jews are admitted out of pity into familiar intercourse with Christians, they repay their hosts after the fashion of the rat hidden in the sack, or the snake in the bosom, or of the burning brand in one's lap. ~ Pope Innocent III
That quote is absolutely golden .
Too bad that the pope didn't carry his observation farther . To is logical conclusion .
.
[color="Red"]"sneaky 'GD' Jews are all alike." ......Marge Schott
" I'd rather have a trained monkey working for me than a nigger,"
Posted : 25/09/2006 6:56 pm
Ya ever notice that if you do a google search on anything the jews might find sensitive like the story of this little boy or any historical figure that spoke out against the jews or were victimized by them or any particulary nasty jew, it's always the jew-ridden WIKIPEDIA that comes up as the first search return? Oh and JEWWATCH has been bumped by WIKIPEDIA as well.
Wikipedia is jew owned and operated. My impression is they NEED to control the flow of information because if they didn't and the truth about them were known to all humanity they would be hunted and killed wherever they are, there'd be no place on Earth safe for the bastards.
I'm with Mel Gibson.
Posted : 25/09/2006 7:08 pm
Topic starter
That quote is absolutely golden .
Too bad that the pope didn't carry his observation farther . To is logical conclusion .
The Church seems to have gone through significant changes since that time. However, as late as the early Twentieth Century, Padre Pio had THESE words.
"The Jews are enemies of God and foes of our holy religion." ~ Padre Pio
Even today Catholics acknowledge that jews are generally hostile to Christianity.
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2000/0001fea1.asp
There is anecdotal evidence of a rise in the number of Jewish conversions, but Israel as a state is still very hostile to Christianity. And there has been a demonstrable weakening of the faith in Europe, with more people considering themselves non-Christian. But most Europeans still maintain a Christian identity in some form. (Actually, there have never been more Christians alive than there are now. With two billion Christians, we are very far from a global apostasy.) There has also been a rise in the number of neo-pagans in the last few decades, but at this point neo-paganism is a fringe phenomenon that attracts more laughs than converts
Posted : 25/09/2006 7:17 pm
The event of Simon of Trent is certainly not commonly known in the world of the lemmings. However, it is just one small event that we can offer as a tidbit of curiosity to those we want to inform. Just tell your convertee to do a search for St. Simon of Trent.
Also, if you think that the filthy scum that call themselves the chosen people have changed their practices since then...well, since they haven't changed any other practices for the past thousands of years, why do you think they have changed this one?
If it weren't for me, where would I be?
Posted : 25/09/2006 11:10 pm
.. Not forgetting St. Hugh of Lincoln.
Posted : 26/09/2006 9:07 am
Topic starter
http://www.talmudunmasked.com/
Jews have a history of hating Christians from the very beginning.
Posted : 26/09/2006 9:29 am
Topic starter
Pope insults Muslims, Muslims want his head.
Jews insult JESUS, Christians like HAGEE worship JEWS
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~humm/Topics/JewishJesus/toledoth.html
In the year 3671 in the days of King Jannaeus, a great misfortune befell Israel, when there arose a certain disreputable man of the tribe of Judah, whose name was Joseph Pandera. He lived at Bethlehem, in Judah.
Near his house dwelt a widow and her lovely and chaste daughter named Miriam. Miriam was betrothed to Yohanan, of the royal house of David, a man learned in the Torah and God-fearing.
At the close of a certain Sabbath, Joseph Pandera, attractive and like a warrior in appearance, having gazed lustfully upon Miriam, knocked upon the door of her room and betrayed her by pretending that he was her betrothed husband, Yohanan. Even so, she was amazed at this improper conduct and submitted only against her will.
Thereafter, when Yohanan came to her, Miriam expressed astonishment at behavior so foreign to his character. It was thus that they both came to know the crime of Joseph Pandera and the terrible mistake on the part of Miriam. Whereupon Yohanan went to Rabban Shimeon ben Shetah and related to him the tragic seduction. Lacking witnesses required for the punishment of Joseph Pandera, and Miriam being with child, Yohanan left for Babylonia.
Miriam gave birth to a son and named him Yehoshua, after her brother. This name later deteriorated to Yeshu. On the eighth day he was circumcised. When he was old enough the lad was taken by Miriam to the house of study to be instructed in the Jewish tradition.
One day Yeshu walked in front of the Sages with his head uncovered, showing shameful disrespect. At this, the discussion arose as to whether this behavior did not truly indicate that Yeshu was an illegitimate child and the son of a niddah. Moreover, the story tells that while the rabbis were discussing the Tractate Nezikin, he gave his own impudent interpretation of the law and in an ensuing debate he held that Moses could not be the greatest of the prophets if he had to receive counsel from Jethro. This led to further inquiry as to the antecedents of Yeshu, and it was discovered through Rabban Shimeon ben Shetah that he was the illegitimate son of Joseph Pandera. Miriam admitted it. After this became known, it was necessary for Yeshu to flee to Upper Galilee
Posted : 26/09/2006 8:43 pm
AA, are you aware that Torquemada was descended from jews?
__________________
[url=http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=944_1216676169]/url]
Posted : 27/09/2006 9:53 am
Topic starter
AA, are you aware that Torquemada was descended from jews?
After updating my profile, I found this info about it. Of course, there are the silly accusations about HITLER being jewish so I don't really know if the Torquemada accusation holds any water or is bullshit as well. Anyway, I'll leave it on there for awhile just to spur curious minds to look into it. At one point the Catholic Church was very jew-wise. Still the Church holds a much different position than the Hagee/Robertson/Falwell Rapture-bunnies. I want to understand what happened to the Church. There are some conspiracy theories about the 1958 Conclave, but I don't buy into them.
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/siri_election.html
Posted : 27/09/2006 3:42 pm